Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:49:45.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary investigations and cognitive considerations of the acoustical resonances of selected archaeological sites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Paul Devereux
Affiliation:
2 Godson's Piece, High Street, Lower Brailes OX15 5AQ, England. E-mail: DevereuxP@aol.com
Robert G. Jahn
Affiliation:
Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Princeton University, Princeton NJ 08544–5263, USA

Extract

Enclosed prehistoric spaces can have fine echoes. The Hypogeum, celebrated underground ossuary of Neolithic Malta, is the most resonant place to chant a rhythmic ‘Oum’. Are the acoustic features of structures like the megalithic chambers of northern Europe integral to their design? An expert description of their acoustic properties is the point to start.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dayton, L. 1992. Rock art evokes beastly echoes of the past, New Scientist 28 November: 14.Google Scholar
Jahn, R. G., Devereux, P. & Ibison, M.. 1995. Acoustical resonances of assorted ancient structures. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University. PEAR Technical Report 95002.Google Scholar
Jahn, R. G., Devereux, P. & Ibison, M.. 1996. Acoustical resonances of assorted ancient structures, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99 (2):649–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, F. 1973. The use of the passage in certain passage-graves as a means of communication rather than access, in Daniel, G. & Kjaarum, P. (ed.), Megaiithic graves and ritual: papers of the 3rd Atlantic Colloquium: 147–62. Jutland Archaeological Society.Google Scholar