Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:27:36.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dendrochronological dating of the Viking Age ship burials at Oseberg, Gokstad and Tune, Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Niels Bonde
Affiliation:
National Museum of Denmark, National Science Research Unit, Dendrochronology, Ny Vestergade 11, DK-1471 Copenhagen K, Denmark
Arne Emil Christensen
Affiliation:
Arne Emil Christensen, Viking Ship Museum, University Museum of National Antiquities, Frederiks gate 2, N-0164 Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Dendrochronology now provides a date, exact nearly to the year, for three Viking Age burial mounds of special importance for chronology in Scandinavia and across early medieval northern Europe. Their dating used to depend on the style of the carved wooden artefacts in the grave goods; now the grave-goods are exactly and independently dated by the tree-rings, those same links will provide dating bridges across the Viking world.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BAILLIE, M.G.L. 1982 Tree–ring dating and archaeology. London Croom Helm.Google Scholar
BAILLIE, M.G.L. & PILCHER, J.R. 1973 A simple cross-dating program for tree-ring research, Tree-Ring Bulletin. 33: 714. Google Scholar
BAILLIE, M.G.L., HILLAM, J. , BRIFFA, K.R. & BROWN, D.M. 1985 Re–dating the English art–historical tree–ring chronologies, Nature. 315: 317–19. Google Scholar
BARTHOLIN, T.S., 1985 Dendrochronology in Sweden, ISKOS. 5: 489–97.Google Scholar
BONDE, N., 1989 Dendrokronologiske dateringer pa Nationalmuseet 1988 – Dendrochronological datings, The National Museum, 1988, Arkaeologiske udgravninger i Danmark 1988: 229–41.Google Scholar
BONDE, N. & CHRISTENSEN, K. 1982 Trelleborgs alder: dendrokronologisk datering – The age of Trelleborg: dendrochronological dating, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og historie1982: 111–52.Google Scholar
BONDE, N., BARTHOLIN, T., CHRISTENSEN, K., ERIKSEN, O.H. & HAVEMANN, K. 1990 Dendro–kronologiske dateringsunders0gelser pà Nationalmuseet 1989 – Dendrochronological dating at the National Museum of Denmark1989, Arkaeologiske udgravninger i Danmark 1989: 245–64.Google Scholar
BONDE, N. & CRUMLIN–PEDERSEN, O. 1990. The dating of Wreck 2, the Longship, from Skuldelev, Denmark, NewsWARP 7: 36.Google Scholar
BONDE, N., DALY, A., ERIKSEN, O.H. & HAVEMANN, K. 1992. Dendrokronologiske dateringsunder–s0gelser pà Nationalmuseet 1991 – Dendro-chronological dating at the National Museum of Denmark 1991, Arkaeologiske udgravninger i Danmark 1991: 255–71.Google Scholar
BRÅTHEN, A. 1982. Dendrokronologisk serie från vasta Sverige 831–1975, Riksantikvarieämbedet Rapport 1982 1. Stockholm: Central Board of the National Antiquities and National Historical Museums Google Scholar
CHRISTENSEN, N. 1991. Wood–anatomical and dendrochronological studies in Bencard, M., Jergensen, L.B. & Madsen, H.B (ed.), Ribe excavations 1970–1976 4: 169–81. Esbjerg: Sydjysk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
CHRISTIANSEN, T.E. 1982. Trelleborgs alder: arkaeologisk datering – The age of Trelleborg: archaeological dating Aarboger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 1982: 84110.Google Scholar
HILLAM, J., MORGAN, R.A. & TYERS, I. 1987. Sapwood estimates and the dating of short ring sequences in Ward, R.G.W. (ed.), Applications of tree–ring studies 165–85. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International series S333Google Scholar
HOLMBOE, J. 1917. Botanisk unders0kelse av torven i Oseberghaugen in Bragger, A.W. Falk, H.J. & Schetelig, H. (ed.), Osebergfundet 1: 201–5.Kristiania (Oslo): Universitetets Oldsaksamling.Google Scholar
HOUGEN, B. 1934. Studier i Gokstadfunnet Universitetets Oldsaksamling Årbog 5.årg.(1931–1932): 74112.Google Scholar
HVASS, S. 1986. Vorbasse – eine Dorfsiedlung während des 1. Jahrtausends n. Chr. in Mitteljütland, Dänemark Bericht der Römisch–Germanischen Kommission 67: 529–42.Google Scholar
JENSEN, S. 1991. The Vikings of Ribe Ribe: Den Antikvariske Sämling.Google Scholar
KARLSSON, L. 1983. Nordisk Form om djurOrnamentik(Nordic form on animal ornament, summary). Stockholm: Museum of National Antiquities.Google Scholar
NICOLAYSEN, N. 1882. The Viking ship discovered at Gokstad in Norway Kristiania (Oslo): Alb. Cammermeyer.Google Scholar
NYDAL, R. 1959. Trondheim natural radiocarbon measurements I in American Journal of Science Radiocarbon Supplement (Radiocarbon) 1: 7680.Google Scholar
ROESDAHL, E. & WILSON, D.M. (ed.). 1992. From Viking to Crusader Catalogue of the 22nd Council of Europe Exhibition.Google Scholar
SHETELIG, H. 1917. Tuneskibet Norske Oldfund 2. Kristiania (Oslo): Universitetets Oldsaksamling.Google Scholar
SHETELIG, H. 1920. Vestfoldskolen in Bragger, A.W., Falk, H.J. & Schetelig, H. (ed.), Osebergfundet 3. Kristiania (Oslo): Universitetets Oldsaksamling.Google Scholar
SHETELIG, H. 1926. Tidsbestemmelser i Vikingetidens Stilhistorie Finska Fornminnesföreningens Tidskrift 36 (1): 106–12.Google Scholar
STUIVER, M. & PEARSON, G.W. 1993. High–precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950–500 BC and 2500–6000 BC Radiocarbon 35: 124.Google Scholar
WAZNY, T. 1990. Aufbau und Anwendung der Dendrochronologie für Eichenholz in Polen Norske Oldfund 2. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar
WILSON, D.M. & KLINDT–JENSEN, O. 1966. Viking art London: Allen&Unwin.Google Scholar