Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T11:50:52.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Avdat in Late Antiquity Project: uncovering the Early Islamic phases of a Byzantine town in the Negev Highlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2022

Scott Bucking*
Affiliation:
Department of History, DePaul University, USA
Daniel Fuks*
Affiliation:
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, UK
Zachary C. Dunseth
Affiliation:
Joukowsky Institute for Archaeology and the Ancient World, Brown University, USA
Lior Schwimer
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Tali Erickson-Gini
Affiliation:
Israel Antiquities Authority, Omer, Israel
*
*Authors for correspondence ✉ sbucking@depaul.edu and df427@cam.ac.uk
*Authors for correspondence ✉ sbucking@depaul.edu and df427@cam.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three seasons of archaeological fieldwork by the Avdat in Late Antiquity Project have yielded new evidence of intensive Early Islamic activity in the late antique town of Avdat in Israel's Negev Highlands. This evidence has important implications for understanding the fate of such towns in the region during the Byzantine–Islamic transition.

Type
Project Gallery
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Introduction

Since 2012, the Avdat in Late Antiquity Project has conducted fieldwork at the UNESCO World Heritage Site of Avdat (also known as Oboda or Abde) in the Negev Highlands of southern Israel (Figure 1). The project was conceived to better understand the late antique phases of this hilltop town and its Byzantine monastic population. Results of the first three seasons, however, have broadened the project's scope considerably, based on new evidence for substantial human activity at the site during the Early Islamic period, c. AD 650–900. Moving beyond the traditional focus on the impressive monumental buildings that form Avdat's Roman–Byzantine acropolis (Negev Reference Negev1997), the project concentrates on the largely uninvestigated 2ha residential sector, which comprises hundreds of rock-hewn dwellings built in terraces along the northern, southern and western slopes immediately below this necropolis (Shereshevski Reference Shereshevski1991: 38–42; see Figure 2). Integrated interdisciplinary investigation of the excavated material is producing new information concerning the activity and identity of Avdat's residential population during the Byzantine–Islamic transition. Shedding light on the social, economic and settlement dynamics of post-urban Avdat, this ongoing research contributes to scholarly discourse on the Byzantine–Islamic transition in the Negev and Near East (e.g. Kennedy Reference Kennedy1985; Avni Reference Avni2011). It offers a new case study for interrogating urban change and continuity, resilience and decline, while giving visibility to ancient groups, such as Christian monks and pastoral nomads, which are usually absent from the narrative of Incense Route sites.

Figure 1. Location of Avdat (map: Google Earth).

Figure 2. Aerial view of the southern slope at Avdat after the 2018 season, with inset showing final excavation of the southern compound after 2019 season (photograph by E. Alajem; inset by S. Bucking).

Excavation results

The project's main area of excavation concerns a stone-built, multi-roomed cave compound along the first terrace of Avdat's southern slope (Figure 2) (Bucking Reference Bucking2017; Bucking & Erickson-Gini Reference Bucking and Erickson-Gini2020). Over three field seasons, a series of stone-constructed rooms articulating with the cave were stratigraphically excavated (Figure 3) and steps were taken to conserve the compound so that it could be included in the UNESCO visitor trail. The compound was initially of interest due to concentrations of red-painted figures and symbols (‘dipinti’) in two rooms (Bucking Reference Bucking2017). These included decorated crosses and a probable depiction of the warrior saint Theodore, possibly indicating a phase of habitation by Christian monks who maintained a martyr cult of Theodore (Negev Reference Negev1997: 122–52). This raises larger questions about urban monastic settlement patterns in the late antique Negev, which have mostly gone unexamined (Goldfus Reference Goldfus2003).

Figure 3. South-western compound section: a) façade; b) southern face, pre-excavation; c) southern face during excavation; d) western face during excavation (photographs by T. Erickson-Gini).

The project's three seasons of fieldwork yielded copious well-preserved organic materials, including substantial layers of herbivore dung and seeds overlying a Byzantine-period floor in the stone-built rooms. These layers, together with watering and feeding troughs, are indicative of livestock stabling. Such livestock may have played a role in viticulture, given that pack animals were used in this industry (e.g. Fuks et al. Reference Fuks, Avni and Bar-Oz2021: fig. 5). This hypothesis is supported by finds of grape seeds and the location of agricultural fields just downslope from the compound. It also accords with evidence of a flourishing viticulture industry in the Byzantine Negev Highlands, apparently involving the participation of monastic communities (Mayerson Reference Mayerson1985).

Context and chronology

To maximise information concerning agricultural regimes, diet, environment and chronology, the project implemented a robust sampling strategy for optimal retrieval of organic remains, directed by the project's archaeobotanist (D.F.). Three organically rich areas of the compound were targeted: (i) the south-western section of the built compound (Figure 4), and (ii) the northern and (iii) western sections near the cave entrance (Figure 5). Section samples were also taken for geoarchaeological analysis.

Figure 4. South-western section chronology in context (photographs by T. Erickson-Gini).

Figure 5. a) Western section sampling; b) northern section sampling; c) reference photo for samplings, showing passageway to the cave after clearing of the northern section (photographs by D. Fuks).

Priority was given to radiocarbon analysis to establish a site chronology, especially considering the sparsity of ceramics. Radiocarbon results were surprising: while a sample of straw extracted from mortar in the dipinti-intensive cave vestibule wall yielded dates within the expected Byzantine range, nine samples from the organic, dung-enriched south-western section were of Umayyad–Abbasid date, ranging from 1190–1320±30 BP/AD 650–890 (Figure 4) (Bucking & Erickson-Gini Reference Bucking and Erickson-Gini2020). Three newly obtained dates from the northern and western sections yielded Abbasid dates (Figure 5): two from a substantial organic layer in the northern section, and one in the western section, where Abbasid Mefjer/Buff Ware (Cytryn-Silverman Reference Cytryn-Silverman and Gutfeld2010) further corroborated this result (Figure 6). The emerging extended chronology enriches ongoing debate surrounding the fate of Negev Highland settlement in the Early Islamic period, especially that regarding continuities and discontinuities of site use between the Byzantine, Umayyad and Abbasid periods (e.g. Magness Reference Magness2003; Avni Reference Avni2008; Butler et al. Reference Butler2020).

Figure 6. Mefjer Ware excavated from compound (photograph by S. Bucking).

Looking ahead

These results raise new questions and research directions to be pursued by the Avdat in Late Antiquity Project. How widespread was Umayyad–Abbasid period activity at Avdat and to what extent does it represent a continuation of Byzantine agricultural settlement versus a possible transition to pastoral nomadism? Throughout the literature are tantalisingly short references to previous finds of Islamic material culture elsewhere in Avdat (Shamir & Baginski Reference Shamir and Baginski2001), further justifying a planned systematic survey and additional excavation of the sector to gauge the extent of Islamic-period activity. Ongoing archaeobotanical and archaeozoological analyses will refine our understanding of local economic activity over time, particularly with regard to viticulture (Fuks et al. Reference Fuks2020, Reference Fuks, Avni and Bar-Oz2021). Geoarchaeological analyses for stratigraphic characterisation of sediments and chronological fine-tuning via additional radiocarbon dating (Butler et al. Reference Butler2020)—including of post-Abbasid strata—are expected to provide high-resolution documentation of Avdat's urban and post-urban phases. These combined analyses will help to identify the various groups active at the site during and after the Byzantine–Early Islamic transition.

Acknowledgements

The project operates in full partnership with the Israel Antiquities Authority and the Israel Nature and Parks Authority. We are grateful to both organisations for facilitating work at the site and for providing a wide range of professional services and support.

Funding statement

The project is grateful for the support provided by the DePaul University Research Council, the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, Office of the Provost, the Department of History, and the American Philosophical Society, in addition to a British Academy Newton International Fellowship awarded to D.F.

Footnotes

First authorship is shared equally between S. Bucking and D. Fuks

References

Avni, G. 2008. The Byzantine–Islamic transition in the Negev: an archaeological perspective. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 35: 126.Google Scholar
Avni, G. 2011. “From Polis to Madina” revisited: urban change in Byzantine and Early Islamic Palestine. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 21: 301–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186311000022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucking, S. 2017. A dipinti-intensive cave dwelling as evidence of a monastic presence in Byzantine Avdat. Journal of Arid Environments 143: 2834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucking, S. & Erickson-Gini, T.. 2020. The Avdat in Late Antiquity Project: report on the 2012/2016 excavations of a cave and stone-built compound along the southern slope. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 8: 2257. https://doi.org/10.5325/jeasmedarcherstu.8.1.0022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, D.H. et al. 2020. Byzantine–Early Islamic resource management detected through micro-geoarchaeological investigations of trash mounds (Negev, Israel). PLoS ONE 15: e0239227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cytryn-Silverman, K. 2010. The ceramic evidence, in Gutfeld, O. (ed.) Ramla: final report on the excavations north of the White Mosque: 97212. Jerusalem: Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Fuks, D. et al. 2020. The rise and fall of viticulture in the late antique Negev Highlands reconstructed from archaeobotanical and ceramic data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 117: 19780–91. https://www.pnas.org/content/117/33/19780CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuks, D., Avni, G. & Bar-Oz, G.. 2021. The debate on Negev viticulture and Gaza wine in late antiquity. Tel-Aviv 48: 143–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03344355.2021.1968626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfus, H. 2003. Urban monasticism and monasteries of Early Byzantine Palestine: preliminary observations. Aram 15: 7179. https://doi.org/10.2143/ARAM.15.0.504526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, H. 1985. From Polis to Madina: urban change in late antique and Early Islamic Syria. Past and Present 106: 327. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/106.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magness, J. 2003. The archaeology of the Early Islamic settlement in Palestine. Winona Lake (IN): Eisenbrauns. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781575065380Google Scholar
Mayerson, P. 1985. The wine and vineyards of Gaza in the Byzantine Period. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 257: 7580. https://doi.org/10.2307/1356820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negev, A. 1997. The architecture of Oboda: final report (Qedem Monographs 36). Jerusalem: Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Shamir, O. & Baginski, A.. 2001. Textiles and cordage from ‘Avdat—the Cave of the Saints. ‘Atiqot 42: 243–60.Google Scholar
Shereshevski, J. 1991. Byzantine urban settlements in the Negev Desert. Beer-Sheva: Ben Gurion University of the Negev Press.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location of Avdat (map: Google Earth).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Aerial view of the southern slope at Avdat after the 2018 season, with inset showing final excavation of the southern compound after 2019 season (photograph by E. Alajem; inset by S. Bucking).

Figure 2

Figure 3. South-western compound section: a) façade; b) southern face, pre-excavation; c) southern face during excavation; d) western face during excavation (photographs by T. Erickson-Gini).

Figure 3

Figure 4. South-western section chronology in context (photographs by T. Erickson-Gini).

Figure 4

Figure 5. a) Western section sampling; b) northern section sampling; c) reference photo for samplings, showing passageway to the cave after clearing of the northern section (photographs by D. Fuks).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Mefjer Ware excavated from compound (photograph by S. Bucking).