Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T21:23:44.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The first British navy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

C. E. Dove
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the commoner, and certainly among the most distinctive, Roman coins found in Britain are the quinarius ship-issues of Allectus—found in Britain and of course minted here. They seem to merit more comment than they have roused so far.

The linear shape of a galley does not accommodate itself to the circular shape of a coin, and Roman galley coins rate high marks for ineptitude. Prows or sterns by themselves, shown not for their own interest but as items in some larger symbolic concept, are tolerably well done. But with complete vessels we find stem-posts and stern-posts as high as the keel is long, boats shaped like bananas or like staples, and galleys fringed with so many indeterminate oars that they looklike centipedes. Some of the Allectus reverses are of this slovenly class (Mattingly and Sydenham, 1933, pl. xix, no. 16), but the better ones—and they are numerous—show a recognizable and seaworthy vessel.

Type
Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 45 , Issue 177 , March 1971 , pp. 15 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammianus Marcellinus: History.Google Scholar
Anon. 1946. Roman Britain in 1945, Journal of Roman Studies, XXXVI, 133–48.Google Scholar
Anon. 1949. Roman Britain in 1948, Journal of Roman Studies, XXXIX, 96–115.Google Scholar
Aulus Gellius: Nodes Atticae.Google Scholar
Aurelius Victor: De Caesaribus.Google Scholar
Caesar: De Bello Gallico.Google Scholar
Carson, R. A. 1959. The mints and coinage of Carausius and Allectus, J. Br. Arch. Ass., XXII, 33–40.Google Scholar
Casson, L. 1965. Harbour and river boats of ancient Rome, Journal of Roman Studies, LV, 31–9.Google Scholar
Chadwick, N. K. 1958. The name Piet, Scottish Gaelic Studies, VIII, 146–76.Google Scholar
Cotton, M. A., and Gathercole, P.. 1958. Excavations at Clausentum, 1951–4.Google Scholar
Harley, l. S. 1951. Essex Naturalist, XXVIII, pt. 5 (March), 379.Google Scholar
Johnstone, p. 1962. A medieval skin boat, Antiquity, XXXVI, 32–7.Google Scholar
Johnstone, p. 1964. The Bantry boat, Antiquity, XXXVIII, 277–84.Google Scholar
Lethbridge, T. C. 1952. Boats and boatmen.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. R. V. 1964. Warships on Roman coins, Mariner’s Mirror (Nov.), 260.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. R. V. 1967. A ship of the Roman period from Blackfriars, in the City of London (Guildhall Museum publication).Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. and Sydenham, E. A.. 1933. Probus to Amandus, The Roman Imperial Coinage, vol. V, pt 2.Google Scholar
Panegyriques Latins. 1949. Tome 1 (Editions Galletier, Paris).Google Scholar
Raleigh, Radford, C. A.. 1946. The Roman villa at Low Ham, Proc. Somerset Arch, and Nat. Hist. Soc., XCII, 25–8.Google Scholar
Richmond, I. A. 1963. Roman Britain.Google Scholar
Scriptores Historiae Augustae. 1930. Bonosus.Google Scholar
Seneca: De Beneficiis.Google Scholar
Vegetius. 1885. ed. Lang, C., Epitoma Rei Militaris: Flavi Vegeti Renati (Teubner, Leipzig).Google Scholar
White, D. A. 1961. Litus Saxonicum: the British Saxon shore in scholarship and history (Madison, Wisconsin).Google Scholar