Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:43:02.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A figure sculpture at Upton Bishop, Herefordshire: continuity and revival in early medieval sculpture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2009

John Hunt
John Hunt*
Affiliation:
John Hunt, 75 Lower Road, Hednesford, Cannock WS12 1ND, UK. E-mail: j.r.hunt@bham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the nineteenth century, a red sandstone figural carving was located in the south-facing chancel wall of the church of St John the Baptist, Upton Bishop, near Ross-on-Wye in Herefordshire. In 2005, following the removal of the stone for recording and conservation, the author was invited to examine and report on the sculpture, and particularly to review the proposal that the sculpture, rather than being of Roman date as had traditionally been supposed, was more probably a Romanesque carving of the twelfth century. The characteristics of the Upton Bishop carving are here examined and the various attributions of dating are reviewed, as a consequence of which it is suggested that the sculpture is neither Roman nor Romanesque in date, but rather is of pre-Conquest origin, most probably of around ad 800. It is thus suggested that the Upton Bishop sculpture represents a significant addition to the corpus of Anglo-Saxon figural sculpture in Herefordshire and the western Midlands, that the characteristics of the sculpture suggest well-established traits forming part of a local style and that these were taken forward into the Romanesque period, thus contributing to the distinctive character of the Herefordshire School of sculpture.

Résumé

Au dix-neuvième siècle, on a trouvé une sculpture figurée en grès rouge dans le mur sud du chœur de l’église de S. Jean-Baptiste, Upton Bishop, près de Ross-on-Wye au Herefordshire. En 2005, suite à la dépose de la pierre pour la consigner et la préserver, l’auteur fut invité à étudier la sculpture et à en faire le compte-rendu, et tout particulièrement à faire le point sur la suggestion que la sculpture, plutôt que de remonter à la période romaine, comme on l’avait toujours supposé, était plus probablement une sculpture romane du douzième siècle. On examine ici les caractéristiques de la sculpture d’Upton Bishop et on fait le point sur les diverses attributions de datation et, en conséquence, on suggère que la sculpture n’est de date ni romaine ni romane mais plutôt qu’elle est d’origine antérieure à la conquête normande, plus probablement d’environ 800. On suggère donc que la sculpture d’Upton Bishop constitue un apport significatif à l’ensemble de la sculpture figurée anglo-saxonne au Herefordshire et dans l’ouest des Midlands, que les caractéristiques de la sculpture suggèrent des traits bien établis qui faisaient partie d’un ‘style local’ et que ceux-ci avaient été transférés à la période romane, contribuant ainsi au caractère distinct de l’école de sculpture du Herefordshire.

Zusammenfassung

Im neunzehnten Jahrhunderts wurde eine Figurenskulptur aus rotem Sandstein an der Südkanzlei der Kirche St John the Baptist in Upton Bishop in der Nähe von Ross-on-Wye in der Grafschaft Herefordshire entdeckt. Im Jahr 2005, nachdem der Stein zur Aufzeichnung und Untersuchung abgenommen wurde, wurde der Autor aufgefordert diese Skulptur zu untersuchen und einen Bericht abzugeben. Insbesondere sollte der Vorschlag nachgeprüft werden, daß die Skulptur anstatt römischen Datums, wie bisher angenommen, eher eine romanische Steinskulptur aus dem zwölften Jahrhundert war. Die Besonderheiten der Upton Bishop Steinskulptur werden hier untersucht und die verschiedenen Kennzeichen zur Datierung geprüft. Daraus geht hervor, daß die Skulptur weder römisch noch romanisch, sondern aus der Zeit vor der normannischen Invasion stammt, höchstwahrscheinlich ca. ad 800. Es wird somit vorgeschlagen, daß die Upton Bishop Skulptur ein wichtiger Bestandteil der Sammlung angelsächsischer Figuren in der Grafschaft Herefordshire und westlichen Midlands ist. Die Merkmale dieser Figur enthalten etablierte Charakterzüge, die für den lokalen Stil typisch sind. Sie wurden bis in die romanische Periode übernommen, und tragen damit zum besonderen Charakter der ‘Hereford School of Sculpture’ bei.

Type
Original Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 89 , September 2009 , pp. 179 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Published sources

Bailey, R N 1996. England’s Earliest Sculptors, Publications of the Dictionary of Old English 5, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Bailey, R N 2005. Anglo-Saxon Sculptures at Deerhurst, Deerhurst: Friends of Deerhurst ChurchGoogle Scholar
Blair, J 1985. ‘Secular minster churches in Domesday Book’, in Domesday Book: a reassessment (ed P H Sawyer), 104–142, London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Blair, J 2001. ‘The Anglo-Saxon Church in Herefordshire: four themes’, in Malpas et al (eds) 2001, 3–13Google Scholar
Brown, G Baldwin 1931. ‘The Lechmere Stone’, Antiq J, 11, 226–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, R, with a contribution from M Hare, 1990. ‘The Lypiatt Cross’, Trans Bristol Gloucestershire Archaeol Soc, 108, 33–52Google Scholar
Coatsworth, E 1997. ‘Late pre-Conquest sculptures with the Crucifixion south of the Humber’, in Bishop Æthelwold: his career and influence (ed B Yorke), 161–193, Woodbridge: BoydellGoogle Scholar
Cramp, R 1965. Early Northumbrian Sculpture, Jarrow: Jarrow ChurchGoogle Scholar
Cramp, R 1977. ‘Schools of Mercian sculpture’, in Dornier (ed) 1977, 191–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornier, A (ed) 1977. Mercian Studies, Leicester: Leicester University PressGoogle Scholar
Farmer, D H (ed) 1983. The Age of Bede, Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Gethyn-Jones, E 1979. The Dymock School of Sculpture, London: PhillimoreGoogle Scholar
Grabar, A 1967. The Beginnings of Christian Art 200–395, London: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
Greene, K 1975. ‘The Romano-Celtic head from the Bon Marché site, Gloucester: a reappraisal’, Antiq J, 55, 338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamer, E Robertson 1992. ‘Patronage and iconography in Romanesque England: the Herefordshire School in context’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Henig, M 1993. Corpus Signorum Imperii Romani. Corpus of Sculpture of the Roman World. Great Britain. Vol I, fascicule 7: Roman Sculpture from the Cotswold Region, with Devon and Cornwall, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Henry, F 1967. Irish Art during the Viking Invasions, 800–1020 AD, London: Methuen & CoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J 2004. ‘Sculpture, dates and patrons: dating the Herefordshire School of sculpture’, Antiq J, 84, 185–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J Stokes, M A 1997. ‘Sculpture and patronage in a Shropshire manor: a group of 12th-century sculptures from Alveley’, J Brit Archaeol Ass, 150, 27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, S 1997. ‘Adam or Christ? A pronominal pun in the Dream of the Rood’, Rev English Stud, xlviii (no. 192), 433–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, J (ed) 1978. Anglo-Saxon and Viking Age Sculpture, BAR Brit Ser 49, Oxford: British Archaeological ReportsGoogle Scholar
Lang, J 1999. ‘The Apostles in Anglo-Saxon sculpture in the age of Alcuin’, Early Medieval Europe, 8/2, 271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malpas, A, Butler, J, Davis, S, Davis, A, Malpas, T Sansom, C (eds) 2001. The Early Church in Herefordshire: proceedings of a conference held in Leominster in June 2000, Leominster: Leominster Historical SocietyGoogle Scholar
Maskelyne, A S Lyle, J V (eds) 1908. Feudal Aids. V: 1284–1431, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Maxwell Lyte, H C (ed) 1920. Book of Fees, commonly called Testa de Nevill. Part I: 1198–1242, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Nash-Williams, V E 1950. The Early Christian Monuments of Wales, Cardiff: University of Wales PressGoogle Scholar
Nordenfalk, C 1977. Celtic and Anglo-Saxon Painting: book illumination in the British Isles 600–800, London: Chatto & WindusGoogle Scholar
Parsons, D 1995. ‘Early churches in Herefordshire: documentary and structural evidence’, in Medieval Art, Architecture and Archaeology at Hereford, Brit Archaeol Ass Conference Proc (ed D Whitehead), 60–74, London: British Archaeological AssociationGoogle Scholar
Paton, J M 1908. ‘Archaeological news, 1907’, American J Archaeol, 12/1 (Jan–Mar), 79–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, K 2001. ‘Archaeology and the three early churches of Herefordshire’, in Malpas et al (eds) 2001, 99–148Google Scholar
Ray, K 2004. ‘Outline brief for comparative study of the Upton Bishop Stone’, unpublished commissioning documentGoogle Scholar
RCHME 1932. Herefordshire, II, East, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Rickert, M 1965. Painting in Britain: the Middle Ages, Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, A, Marquez-Grant, N Loe, L 2008. Life and Death in a Roman City: excavation of a Roman cemetery with a mass grave at 120–122 London Road, Gloucester, Oxford: Oxford ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Stone, L 1972. Sculpture in Britain: the Middle Ages, Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H M 1965. ‘Iconography of the Wormington Crucifixion’, Antiquity, 39, 55–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H M Taylor, J 1980. Anglo-Saxon Architecture, ii, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Temple, E 1976. Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts 900–1066: a survey of MSS illuminated in the British Isles, 2, London: Harvey MillerGoogle Scholar
Thompson, V 2004. Dying and Death in Later Anglo-Saxon England, Anglo-Saxon Stud 4, Woodbridge: BoydellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorn, F Thorn, C (eds) 1983. Domesday Book, Herefordshire, Chichester: PhillimoreGoogle Scholar
Thurlby, M 1984. ‘A note on the Romanesque sculpture at Hereford Cathedral and the Herefordshire School of sculpture’, Burlington Mag, 126, 233–234Google Scholar
Thurlby, M 1999. The Herefordshire School of Romanesque Sculpture, Logaston: Logaston PressGoogle Scholar
Tweddle, D, Biddle, M Kjølbye-Biddle, B 1995. Corpus of Anglo-Saxon Stone Sculpture. Vol IV: South East England, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Webster, L Backhouse, J (eds) 1991. The Making of England: Anglo-Saxon art and culture AD 600–900, London: British Museum PressGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D M 1984. Anglo-Saxon Art: from the seventh century to the Norman Conquest, London: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
Youngs, S (ed) 1989. The Work of Angels: masterpieces of Celtic metalwork, 6th–9th centuries AD, London: British Museum PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Zarnecki, G 1951a. ‘Regional Schools of English sculpture in the twelfth century: the Southern School and the Herefordshire School’, unpublished PhD thesis, London UniversityGoogle Scholar
Zarnecki, G 1951b. English Romanesque Sculpture 1066–1140, London: Alec TirantiGoogle Scholar
Zarnecki, G 1998. ‘The Romanesque sculpture of the Welsh marches’, in Medieval Art: recent perspectives. A Memorial Tribute to C R Dodwell (eds G R Owen-Crocker and T Graham), 61–87, Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar