Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:27:44.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rewriting and Rereading the Fasti: Augustus, Ovid and Recent Classical Scholarship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

Elaine Fantham
Elaine Fantham*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

May I begin by thanking you sincerely for inviting me to give this Todd Memorial Lecture? I am sensible of the honour, not only in memory of the pioneer Australian Latinist whose name it bears, but in view of the roll-call of Classical scholars who have spoken before me. I am particularly conscious of my own debt to two predecessors here, the unforgettable Sir Ronald Syme and my former teacher Gordon Williams, who from their different viewpoints have had a considerable influence on present day approaches to Augustan—and some would say un-Augustan—poetry.

I shall be talking today about two kinds of fasti or calendar, the public, inscribed, fasti of Augustan Rome, and the poetic Fasti of Ovid, the last great poet of the age of Augustus. But I should first introduce both calendar and calendar poem, before moving on to discuss the interpretative battle which has recently developed over Ovid's complex but fascinating work.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 29 , 1995 , pp. 42 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1957–1958 Naso, P. Ovidius: Die Fasten, I and II, ed. Bömer, F. (Heidelberg)Google Scholar
1978 Nasonis, P. OvidiFastorum Libri Sex, ed. Alton, E., Wormell, D., Courtney, E. (19852) (Leipzig)Google Scholar
1978 Syme, R., History in Ovid (Oxford)Google Scholar
1978 Williams, G.W., Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire (Berkeley)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979 Johnson, W.R., ‘The Desolation of the Fasti’, CW 74, 7–18Google Scholar
1984 McKeown, J., ‘Fabula proposito nulla legenda meo: Ovid's Fasti and Augustan Politics’ in Woodman, A.J. and West, D. (edd.), Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus (Cambridge) 169-87Google Scholar
1987 Hadrill, A. Wallace, ‘Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus and the Fasti’ in Hardie, P., M., and Whitby, M. (edd.), Homo Viator (Bristol) 221-30Google Scholar
Hinds, S., ‘Generalizing about Ovid’ in Boyle, A.J. (ed.), The Imperial Muse (= Ramus 16) 4–31Google Scholar
1989 Harries, B., ‘Causation and the Authority of the Poet in Ovid's Fasti’, CQ 39, 164–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991 Hardie, P., ‘The Janus Episode in Ovid's Fasti’, MD 26,47–64.Google Scholar
1991 Barchiesi, A., ‘Discordant Muses’, PCPS 37, 1–21Google Scholar
1992 Feeney, D., ‘Si licet et fas est: Ovid's Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principale’ in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus (London) 1–25Google Scholar
1992 Kennedy, D., ‘Augustan and Anti-Augustan: Reflections on Terms of Reference’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus (London). 26–58Google Scholar
1992 Hinds, S., ‘Arma and the Fasti’, Arethusa 25 (The Rediscovery of Ovid's Fasti) 81–149 [See also the papers in this volume by Fantham, Johnson, Newlands, Miller and Phillips.]Google Scholar
1994 Barchiesi, A, Il Poeta e Il Principe: Ovidio e il Discorso Augusteo (Roma-Bari)Google Scholar
1994 Herbert-Brown, G., Ovid and the Fasti: A Historical Study (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995 Newlands, C., Playing with Time: a Study of Ovid's Fasti (Ithaca) 1996Google Scholar
1996 Krevans, N., The Poet as Editor: the Poetic Book from Callimachus to Ovid (Princeton)Google Scholar