Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T09:22:43.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weddell seal foraging dives: comparison of free-ranging and isolated-hole paradigms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2014

K.M. Madden ,
L.A. Fuiman ,
T.M. Williams  and
R.W. Davis
K.M. Madden*
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, TX 78373, USA
L.A. Fuiman
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, TX 78373, USA
T.M. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Ems-A316, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
R.W. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University, 5007 Avenue U, Galveston, TX 77553, USA
*
kiersten.madden@utexas.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weddell seals are polar predators that must partition their time between many behaviours, including hunting prey at depth and breathing at the surface. Although they have been well studied, little is known about how foraging behaviour changes when access to breathing holes is restricted, such as in the isolated-hole paradigm. The current study took advantage of previously gathered data for seals diving at an isolated hole to compare with foraging behaviour of free-ranging seals that had access to multiple holes. We examined dive structure, hunting tactics, and allocation of time, locomotor activity and energy based on three-dimensional dive profiles and video imagery of prey encounters for two free-ranging and six isolated-hole seals. Midsummer foraging dives of free-ranging seals were remarkably similar to those of seals diving at an isolated hole, but there were differences in two behavioural states and the frequency of several behavioural transitions. Results indicate that seals employ an energetically more conservative foraging strategy when access to breathing holes is limited and prey are less abundant. These results highlight the importance of understanding the complex interactions between breathing hole access, prey abundance and other factors that may result in different Weddell seal foraging strategies under changing future conditions.

Keywords

Antarcticbehaviourbreathing holesmarine mammalMcMurdo Soundprey
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 57 - 68
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bester, M.N. & Hofmeyr, G. 2007. Seals. In Riffenburgh, B., ed. Encyclopedia of Antarctica. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, 877–880.Google Scholar
Blackwell, S.B., Haverl, C.A., Le Boeuf, B.J. & Costa, D.P. 1999. A method for calibrating swim-speed recorders. Marine Mammal Science, 15, 894–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J.M. & Castellini, M.A. 1996. Physiological and behavioural determinants of the aerobic dive limit in Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii) pups. Journal of Comparative Physiology - Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology, B166, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J.M., Trumble, S.J., Castellini, M.A. & Testa, J.W. 1998. The diet of Weddell seals in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica as determined from scat collections and stable isotope analysis. Polar Biology, 19, 272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellini, M.A., Davis, R.W. & Kooyman, G.L. 1992. Annual cycles of diving behaviour and ecology of the Weddell seal. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 28, 1–54.Google Scholar
Davis, R.W., Fuiman, L.A., Madden, K.M. & Williams, T.M. 2013. Classification and behavior of free-ranging Weddell seal dives based on three-dimensional movements and video-recorded observations. Deep-Sea Research II - Topical Studies in Oceanography, 88–89, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R.W., Fuiman, L.A., Williams, T.M., Horning, M. & Hagey, W. 2003. Classification of Weddell seal dives based on 3-dimensional movements and video-recorded observations. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 264, 109–122.Google Scholar
Davis, R.W., Fuiman, L.A., Williams, T.M., Collier, S.O., Hagey, W.P., Kanatous, S.B., Kohin, S. & Horning, M. 1999. Hunting behaviour of a marine mammal beneath the Antarctic fast ice. Science, 283, 993–996.Google Scholar
Dearborn, J.H. 1965. Food of Weddell seals at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Journal of Mammalogy, 46, 37–43.Google Scholar
Erickson, A.W., Siniff, D.B., Cline, D.R. & Hoffman, R. 1971. Distributional ecology of Antarctic seals. In Deacon, G., ed. Symposium on Antarctic ice and water masses. Cambridge: SCAR, 55–75.Google Scholar
Fagen, M. & Young, D.Y. 1979. Temporal patterns of behaviours: durations, intervals, latencies, and sequences. In Colgan, P.W., ed. Quantitative ethology. New York, NY: Wiley, 79–114.Google Scholar
Fuiman, L.A., Davis, R.W. & Williams, T.M. 2002. Behaviour of midwater fishes under the Antarctic ice: observations by a predator. Marine Biology, 140, 815–822.Google Scholar
Fuiman, L.A., Madden, K.M., Williams, T.M. & Davis, R.W. 2007. Structure of foraging dives by Weddell seals at an isolated hole in the Antarctic fast-ice environment. Deep-Sea Research II - Topical Studies in Oceanography, 54, 270–289.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J.R. & Erickson, A.W. 1977. Distribution and abundance of seals in the pack ice of the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. In Llano, G.A., ed. Adaptations within the Antarctic ecosystems. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute, 703–740.Google Scholar
Harcourt, R.G., Hindell, M.A. & Waas, J.R. 1998. Under-ice movements and territory use in free-ranging Weddell seals during the breeding season. New Zealand Natural Sciences, 23, 72–73.Google Scholar
Harcourt, R.G., Hindell, M.A., Bell, D.G. & Waas, J.R. 2000. Three-dimensional dive profiles of free-ranging Weddell seals. Polar Biology, 23, 479–487.Google Scholar
Kooyman, G.L. 1965. Techniques used in measuring diving capacities of Weddell seals. Polar Record, 12, 391–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooyman, G.L. 1968. An analysis of some behavioural and physiological characteristics related to diving in the Weddell seal. Antarctic Research Series, 11, 227–261.Google Scholar
Kooyman, G.L. 1981. Weddell seal: consummate diver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooyman, G.L. 1989. Diverse divers: physiology and behaviour. Berlin: Springer, 216 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooyman, G.L., Wahrenbrock, E.A., Castellini, M.A., Davis, R.W. & Sinnett, E.E. 1980. Aerobic and anaerobic metabolism during voluntary diving in Weddell seals – evidence of preferred pathways from blood chemistry and behaviour. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 138, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, D.L. 1988. The behavioral ecology of air breathing by aquatic animals. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66, 89–94.Google Scholar
Lake, S., Burton, H. & van den Hoff, J. 2003. Regional, temporal and fine-scale spatial variation in Weddell seal diet at four coastal locations in east Antarctica. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 254, 293–305.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D.M., Bernholz, C.D. & Ronald, K. 1977. Functional aspects of pinniped vision. In Harrison, R.J., ed. Functional anatomy of marine mammals. New York, NY: Academic Press, 135–174.Google Scholar
Lehner, P.N. 1996. Handbook of ethological methods. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 672 pp.Google Scholar
Madden, K.M., Fuiman, L.A., Williams, T.M. & Davis, R.W. 2008. Identification of foraging dives in free-ranging Weddell seals Leptonychotes weddellii: confirmation using video records. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 365, 263–275.Google Scholar
Mitani, Y., Watanabe, Y., Sato, K., Cameron, M.F. & Naito, Y. 2004. 3D diving behavior of Weddell seals with respect to prey accessibility and abundance. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 281, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori, Y. 1999. The optimal allocation of time and respiratory metabolism over the dive cycle. Behavioural Ecology, 10, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvist, J., Hill, R.D., Schneider, R.C., Falke, K.F., Liggins, G.C., Guppy, M., Elliott, R.L., Hochachka, P.W. & Zapol, W.M. 1986. Hemoglobin concentrations and blood gas tensions of free-diving Weddell seals. Journal of Applied Physiology, 61, 1560–1569.Google Scholar
Ricker, W.E. 1984. Computation and uses of central trend lines. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62, 1897–1905.Google Scholar
Testa, J.W., Siniff, D.B., Ross, M.J. & Winter, J.D. 1985. Weddell seal–Antarctic cod interactions in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. In Siegried, W.R., Cody, P.R. & Laws, R.M., eds. Antarctica nutrient cycles and food webs. New York, NY: Springer, 561–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T.M., Davis, R.W., Fuiman, L.A., Francis, J., Le Boeuf, B.L., Horning, M., Calambokidis, J. & Croll, D.A. 2000. Sink or swim: strategies for cost-efficient diving by marine mammals. Science, 288, 133–136.Google Scholar
Williams, T.M., Fuiman, L.A., Horning, M. & Davis, R.W. 2004. The cost of foraging by a marine predator, the Weddell seal Leptonychotes weddellii: pricing by the stroke. Journal of Experimental Biology, 207, 973–982.Google Scholar