Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-13T07:14:59.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dark ice in a warming world: advances and challenges in the study of Greenland Ice Sheet's biological darkening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2023

Laura Halbach*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Environmental Science, iClimate, Roskilde, Denmark
Lou-Anne Chevrollier*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Environmental Science, iClimate, Roskilde, Denmark
Joseph M. Cook
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Environmental Science, iClimate, Roskilde, Denmark
Ian T. Stevens
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Environmental Science, iClimate, Roskilde, Denmark
Martin Hansen
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Environmental Science, iClimate, Roskilde, Denmark
Alexandre M. Anesio
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Environmental Science, iClimate, Roskilde, Denmark
Liane G. Benning
Affiliation:
GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany Department of Earth Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Martyn Tranter
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Environmental Science, iClimate, Roskilde, Denmark
*
Authors for correspondence: Laura Halbach, E-mail: lh@envs.au.dk; Lou-Anne Chevrollier, E-mail: lou.chevrollier@envs.au.dk
Authors for correspondence: Laura Halbach, E-mail: lh@envs.au.dk; Lou-Anne Chevrollier, E-mail: lou.chevrollier@envs.au.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The surface of the Greenland Ice Sheet is darkening, which accelerates its surface melt. The role of glacier ice algae in reducing surface albedo is widely recognised but not well quantified and the feedbacks between the algae and the weathering crust remain poorly understood. In this letter, we summarise recent advances in the study of the biological darkening of the Greenland Ice Sheet and highlight three key research priorities that are required to better understand and forecast algal-driven melt: (i) identifying the controls on glacier ice algal growth and mortality, (ii) quantifying the spatio-temporal variability in glacier ice algal biomass and processes involved in cell redistribution and (iii) determining the albedo feedbacks between algal biomass and weathering crust characteristics. Addressing these key research priorities will allow us to better understand the supraglacial ice-algal system and to develop an integrated model incorporating the algal and physical controls on ice surface albedo.

Type
Letter
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Glaciological Society

Introduction

The surface of the Greenland Ice Sheet is darkening (He and others, Reference He2013; Tedesco and others, Reference Tedesco2016; Tedstone and others, Reference Tedstone2017), which accelerates its surface melt during the summer. The surface darkening is attributed to changes in the physical properties of snow and ice during the melt season, as well as the presence of light-absorbing particulates (LAPs; Dumont and others, Reference Dumont2014, Tedesco and others, Reference Tedesco2016, Tedstone and others, Reference Tedstone2020). The physical changes in ice structure and variability in the concentration of LAPs in bare ice areas are not well represented in regional climate models (RCMs; Tedesco and others Reference Tedesco2016), leading to underestimations of predicted melt rates, particularly in the southwestern margin of the ice sheet (Alexander and others, Reference Alexander2014; Tedesco and others, Reference Tedesco2016; Antwerpen and others, Reference Antwerpen, Tedesco, Fettweis, Alexander and van de Berg2022). In this region, part of the discrepancy between observed and modelled albedo is explained by the presence of biological LAPs, in particular blooms of pigmented microalgae, which darken large areas of the ice surface (Wang and others, Reference Wang, Tedesco, Alexander, Xu and Fettweis2020; Tedstone and others, Reference Tedstone2020; Cook and others, Reference Cook2020; Williamson and others Reference Williamson2021). The prolonged exposure of bare ice areas, due to the accelerated snowline retreat induced by climate warming (Ryan and others, Reference Ryan2018), is thought to extend the growth season of these microalgae. This could lead to larger, darker and more prolonged algal blooms in future (Benning and others, Reference Benning, Anesio, Lutz and Tranter2014). At the same time, changes in precipitation and intensified run-off may alter the physical and chemical conditions on the ice surface, with unknown consequences for algal bloom development and, thus, biological albedo reduction.

The main algal species darkening the ice surface are Ancylonema alaskana and A. nordenskiöldii (Lutz and others Reference Lutz, McCutcheon, McQuaid and Benning2018), hereafter referred to as glacier ice algae (Fig. 1a). The strong light absorption and albedo-reducing effect of glacier ice algae is due to their intracellular accumulation of the pigment purpurogallin carboxylic acid-6-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (Remias and others, Reference Remias, Holzinger, Aigner and Lu2012a, Reference Remias2012b; Williamson and others, Reference Williamson2020; Halbach and others, Reference Halbach2022; Fig. 1a, b). The optical properties of glacier ice algae have recently been measured (Chevrollier and others, Reference Chevrollier2022; Fig. 1d) and incorporated into the radiative transfer model, BioSNICAR (Flanner and others Reference Flanner, Zender, Randerson and Rasch2007; Cook and others, Reference Cook2020), along with an adding-doubling solver (Briegleb and Light, Reference Briegleb and Light2007) that was shown to accurately predict glacier ice albedo (Whicker and others, Reference Whicker2022). BioSNICAR predicts algal-driven albedo reduction from the surface concentration of algal cells, illumination conditions, as well as vertical profiles of ice density and bubble/pore size (https://github.com/jmcook1186/biosnicar-py). Chevrollier and others (Reference Chevrollier2022) showed this model could be used to accurately recreate the spectral reflectance of ice surfaces populated by algal blooms (Fig. 1e), suggesting that it can be used to study the algal impact on bare ice albedo, including an integration into remote sensing and predictive modelling systems. In particular, Chevrollier and others's (Reference Chevrollier2022) model validations imply that synthetic albedo datasets covering wide ranges of possible ice column, impurity and illumination conditions can be used to derive algal detection algorithms. So far, these algorithms had been derived from relatively small empirical datasets because radiative transfer models did not have access to reliable algal optical properties or validation data.

Fig. 1. Pigments, light absorption and albedo reduction by glacier ice algae. (a) Microscope picture of Ancylonema alaskana, scale bar = 5 μm (b) average pigment composition of glacier ice algae, (c) picture of the weathering crust surface, (d) average absorption cross-section of glacier ice algae and (e) measured and modelled spectra of an ice surface colonised by glacier ice algae. Figures adapted from Halbach and others (Reference Halbach2022) and Chevrollier and others (Reference Chevrollier2022).

BioSNICAR could eventually be refactored for coupling to RCMs to forecast algal-driven melt, but this will require models for algal biomass accumulation and surface crust development to be built. However, the controls on surface algal biomass distribution and weathering crust state as well as the feedback between them are not yet sufficiently well understood (Fig. 2). Here we outline the knowledge and process-level understanding needed for these modelling developments, using a combination of field measurements, laboratory experiments, remote sensing and modelling.

Fig. 2. Schematic overview of the ice-algal system and key feedbacks with environmental variables and surface albedo. Note that not all interactions are included, for example among environmental variables. The incoming shortwave radiation available for the algae will also indirectly depend on the presence and properties of a snow cover.

Controls on algal growth and mortality

The availability of liquid water, light and nutrients could limit glacier ice algal growth (Fig. 2). As CO2 is constantly supplied from the atmosphere to the ice surface, where it easily dissolves, it is unlikely to be a limiting factor at the ice surface that the algae inhibit. To date, algal growth has been modelled as a function of the cumulative growth period where environmental conditions allow for algal growth (Williamson and others, Reference Williamson2018, Reference Williamson2020; Onuma and others, Reference Onuma2022). The thresholds of these environmental conditions were defined by Williamson and others (Reference Williamson2020) as a snow-free ice surface (snow cover <2 cm), sufficient solar irradiance to drive photochemistry (shortwave radiation >10 W m−2) and the availability of liquid water (air temperature >0.5°C). In contrast, Onuma and others (Reference Onuma2022) used an ice temperature >0°C as a threshold for liquid water availability and did not define a solar irradiance threshold. However, there remains a lack of data to support the environmental conditions and values used as thresholds.

For example, the environmental conditions under which liquid water limits algal growth remain unknown. It has been estimated that glacier ice algae direct 48 to 65% of the incident irradiance to ice melting (Williamson and others, Reference Williamson2020), and thereby create their own liquid micro-environment, which would need to be considered for assessing a potential lack of liquid water for the algae (Fig. 2). Light availability may restrict photochemistry and subsequently growth during the beginning of the melt season when glacier ice algae are buried under a thick snow cover and, therefore, growth onset also depends on the timing of winter snowpack retreat (Williamson and others, Reference Williamson2018). Yet, algal activity measurements from below the snow cover are currently not available. Light availability is unlikely to be growth-limiting later in the season due to typically high incident solar irradiance and long day length duration, increasing with decreasing longitude. On the other hand, high incident irradiances in the middle of the season may potentially suppress glacier ice algal productivity, as demonstrated by in situ incubations that show the suppression of photochemistry at 100% ambient light during a mid-ablation season (Williamson and others, Reference Williamson2020). To define the thresholds for algal light requirements, incubation experiments or field measurements of glacier ice algal activity pre-and during snowline retreat, together with the light transmission through the snow are required. Sampling glacier ice algal populations from beneath the snow or the analysis of regression fits of their biomass progression throughout the season could additionally provide estimates of their initial population size, which is required to model algal bloom progression throughout the season (Williamson and others, Reference Williamson2020; Onuma and others, Reference Onuma2022).

So far, nutrient availability has not been incorporated into glacier ice algal growth models for the Greenland Ice Sheet (Fig. 2). McCutcheon and others (Reference McCutcheon2021) found that glacier ice algal growth is limited by phosphorous after long incubations (120 h) and suggested that the delayed response could be due to an internal phosphorus storage by the cells. No indication of nutrient limitation was found for short incubation times, suggesting that in situ nutrients can support algal nutrient requirements (Halbach, Reference Halbach2022). Moreover, the low intracellular carbon:nitrate:phosphorous ratios of algal dominated particulate organic matter (Williamson and others 2021) and single glacier ice algal cells (Halbach, Reference Halbach2022) suggest that they are well adapted to their oligotrophic environment. To fully comprehend the role of nutrients in glacier ice algal growth and their potential relevance for models, future studies should quantify algal nutrient uptake and storage (e.g. by using stable isotope tracers), as well as the competition and recycling of nutrients by other organisms of the community (e.g. by following examples from other aquatic systems in Klawonn and others, Reference Klawonn2019 or Adam and others, Reference Adam2016) (Fig. 2).

Controls on cell mortality are also currently understudied (Fig. 2). It has been shown that Chytridiomycota, a group of parasitic fungi, are widespread on the ice sheet and can infect algal cells (Perini and others, Reference Perini2019, Reference Perini2022; Fiolka and others, Reference Fiołka2021). Recently, it has been found that the prevalence of infection with chytrids among glacier ice algal populations from Alaska is 3.9 ± 5.6% on the bare ice (Kobayashi and others, Reference Kobayashi, Takeuchi and Kagami2023). However, the relative proportions of uninfected and infected cells on the Greenland Ice Sheet and a potential variability of infection prevalence throughout the season remain unknown. Ratios of viable, dead, infected or uninfected cells could be estimated by microscopy techniques, multi-stain, flow-cytometry and cell-sorting (Davey and Kell, Reference Davey and Kell1996; Klawonn and others, Reference Klawonn, Dunker, Kagami, Grossart and Van den Wyngaert2021a) as well as algal activity assessments (e.g. by Secondary-Ion-Mass-Spectrometry or BONCAT; Hatzenpichler and others, Reference Hatzenpichler2016; Gao and others, Reference Gao, Hutchins and Beardall2021; Klawonn and others, Reference Klawonn2021b, Grujcic and others, Reference Grujcic, Taylor and Foster2022).

Experiments under controlled conditions are needed to quantify growth and mortality specifically, isolated from other physical and hydrological redistribution processes (Fig. 2). Available glacier ice algal population doubling times using this approach amounted to 3.75 ± 0.36 days (net primary productivity measurements in the field Williamson and others (Reference Williamson2018)). It should be noted that any incubation of glacier ice algae in a liquid medium within bottles changes the growth conditions relative to in situ conditions (growth substrate, nutrient conditions, irradiance, temperature). Thus, in situ incubations in the field directly on the ice or short incubation times should be generally preferred to avoid or minimise extensive bottle effects. Laboratory cultures of glacier ice algae may allow the design and implementation of future experiments to study the role of microbial interactions on cell mortality and nutrient recycling (Fig. 2).

Physical and hydrological controls on the spatio-temporal variability of algal blooms

In addition to growth and mortality, it is hypothesised that glacier ice algal biomass distribution is also affected by hydrological processes, which can transport algal cells within supraglacial meltwater flow of the near-surface ‘weathering crust’ (see Cooper and others, Reference Cooper2018; Stevens and others, Reference Stevens2018) and supraglacial channels. Subsequently, such hydrological controls are likely to have important implications for albedo reduction (Fig. 2) (Stibal and others, Reference Stibal2017; Christner and others, Reference Christner2018; Tedstone and others, Reference Tedstone2020; Irvine-Fynn and others, Reference Irvine-Fynn2021; Stevens and others, Reference Stevens2022). However, the interplay between the retention of algae and their hydrological transport from the ice surface presents a key research avenue, with rates and controls upon biomass transport remaining poorly characterised.

Recent work has revealed the simultaneous advection of microbes and accumulation of microbial biomass throughout the melt season on the western Greenland Ice Sheet, with estimated bare-ice advection rates of microbes (<20 μm) for a typical melt season of 5.73 × 1012 cells km−2 d−1 (Irvine-Fynn and others, Reference Irvine-Fynn2021). However, the controls upon microbial abundance and, hence, transport mechanics of weathering crust meltwaters remain poorly defined, with no apparent link between depth-integrated hydraulic conductivity and microbial abundance (Stevens and others, Reference Stevens2022). Henceforth, more sophisticated approaches are required to fully understand and quantify the transport and retention dynamics of glacier ice algae (and by extension, all glacier microbes) from the ice surface, through the weathering crust and into the channelised glacial hydrological system. Ultimately, addressing this knowledge gap will help to elucidate the role of the supraglacial hydrological system in the spatio-temporal variability of algal blooms and their associated albedo reduction.

It has been suggested that the retention and transport of microbes from the surface to and within the saturated weathering crust system is size selective (Irvine-Fynn and others, Reference Irvine-Fynn2021; Stevens and others, Reference Stevens2022), with hypothesised controls including mechanical filtration by the weathering crust matrix (Mader and others, Reference Mader, Pettitt, Wadham, Wolff and Parkes2006), extra-cellular polymeric substances (e.g. Langford and others, Reference Langford, Hodson, Banwart and Bøggild2010; Holland and others, Reference Holland2019) or so-called hydrological ‘flushing’ (Adrien, Reference Adrien2004) with large melt events and/or weathering crust removal events. Future investigations should aim to ascertain the role of more precise hydrological metrics in partnership with algal concentrations and size distributions, specifically examining the following variables in depth-integrated and/or depth-specific manner: effective porosity of the weathering crust, direct weathering crust meltwater velocities, water delivery and drainage (from surface melt, internal melt and rainfall) and water table height. In addition, the application of tracer studies and/or high resolution 4D models at the micro-catchment scale, using the variables outlined above will help to ascertain algal mobility and near-surface residence periods beyond the point scale. Moreover, these variables are hypothesised to be highly temporally variable on a sub-hourly scale (Stevens, Reference Stevens2018), in response to diurnal and synoptic scale meteorological cycles, and should be examined under the widest possible range of antecedent and ongoing meteorological conditions. Physical, topographic and meteorological data can be gathered at different times and spatial scales from field studies, digital elevation models, automatic weather station networks (e.g. PROMICE: Fausto and others, Reference Fausto2021) or outputs from RCMs (e.g. MAR, Fettweis and others, Reference Fettweis2017; RACMO, Noël and others, Reference Noël2018). Links between these environmental data and changes in algal biomass distribution should be explored to unravel potential correlations between them.

Algal biomass can be assessed by field sampling or remote detection. Field samples can be analysed to retrieve detailed information about cell concentrations and community composition but can only represent very small areas within the very heterogeneous ice surface, which limits upscaling. Furthermore, it is common to retrieve surface ice using the adze of an ice axe or a trowel which, due to the very heterogeneous structure of the upper surface, can lead to uncertainty in the actual dimensions of the sampled area. It is also challenging to measure the specific surface area and effective grain radius in the field to configure a radiative transfer model to accurately represent a give sample area. However, new techniques for resolving the near-surface ice structure are emerging (e.g. Allgaier and others, Reference Allgaier2022).

Remote sensing enables us to study ice albedo and algal biomass over large spatial scales but changes in algal biomass can only be inferred indirectly using algorithms. Ground truthing these algorithms can be challenging due to the scale mismatch between satellite pixel size and field samples. Using hyperspectral images mounted on low-flying unmanned aerial vehicles might help to bridge that gap because the ground resolution of the resulting imagery is fine enough to match precisely to field sampling areas and can also be coarsened to match the footprint of satellite sensors. Several algorithms have been used to detect algal biomass. The simplest is based on Chlorophyll-a absorption (e.g. Painter and others, Reference Painter2001; Ganey and others, Reference Ganey, Loso, Burgess and Dial2017), however, they rely on a high spectral resolution to identify ‘biologically unique’ reflectance patterns. There have also been several papers that used classification algorithms such as K-nearest neighbours (Ryan and others, Reference Ryan2018), random forest decision trees (Cook and others, Reference Cook2020) and optimal estimation (Bohn and others, Reference Bohn2022). Further, algal growth has also been estimated using the ratio of reflectance at two red wavelengths as a proxy for algal concentration at the scale of the entire Greenland Ice Sheet ablation zone (Wang and others, Reference Wang, Tedesco, Xu and Alexander2018, Reference Wang, Tedesco, Alexander, Xu and Fettweis2020) and for Alpine glaciers (Di Mauro and others, Reference Di Mauro2020). To date, the main limitation of all these approaches has been the small training dataset sizes, but with empirical algal optical properties now incorporated into radiative transfer models (Chevrollier and others, Reference Chevrollier2022) there is potential to train these algorithms on very large synthetic datasets that cover the complete range of weathering crust conditions and biomass concentrations. By informing algal detection algorithm development and validation, improvements to both radiative transfer models and field sampling techniques will lead to more accurate quantification of glacier algal spatio-temporal dynamics and albedo impacts at the ice-sheet scale.

Indirect darkening effect of algal blooms

The state of the weathering crust is further an important control of surface albedo (Tedstone and others, Reference Tedstone2020; Fig. 2). Glacier ice algae can indirectly impact surface albedo by modifying the weathering crust surface (stimulating ice melting), in addition to their direct impact on albedo through shortwave radiation absorption (Cook and others, Reference Cook2017; Williamson and others, Reference Williamson2019). Thereby, glacier ice algae influence weathering crust decay by enhancing surface lowering relative to subsurface melting (Fig. 2), which creates a denser, less porous crust (Schuster, Reference Schuster2001; Cook and others, Reference Cook2020; Tedstone and others, Reference Tedstone2020), reducing the albedo. The indirect effect of algal blooms on weathering crust decay may be one of the reasons why algal abundance alone does not explain the discrepancy between MAR and MODIS albedo for the southwestern margin of the ice sheet in the study by Wang and others (Reference Wang, Tedesco, Alexander, Xu and Fettweis2020). However, our understanding of the indirect albedo-reducing effect of algal blooms through weathering crust densification is currently limited by a lack of empirical data and validated weathering crust development models.

Simultaneous monitoring of algal abundance and weathering crust physical properties through field samplings, experiments or remote sensing could help to elucidate these feedbacks. These physical properties include for example the density of near-surface ice (defined as ice to a 2 m depth), which describes the weathering crust growth and decay (Schuster, Reference Schuster2001). The development of algorithms for predicting weathering crust physical properties from remote sensing data has so far been restricted. This is due to a ‘many-to-one’ problem, where the same spectral albedo can be generated with different combinations of ice density and effective bubble sizes, and it is impossible to assess the correct combination. For snow, effective grain sizes can be inferred from spectral measurements (Nolin and Dozier, Reference Nolin and Dozier2000), but it is not clear that this method transfers to glacier ice. To address this, model inversions could be performed on many field spectra that have associated density profile measurements to establish a relationship between ice density and effective bubble size. This could enable remote quantification of weathering crust physical properties simultaneously with detecting algal cells.

To validate and improve weathering crust development models (Schuster, Reference Schuster2001; Woods and Hewitt, Reference Woods and Hewitt2022), empirical datasets are needed combining simultaneous measurements of weathering crust physical properties, meteorological parameters and surface albedo through time (Fig. 2). Eventually, weathering crust models could be coupled to BioSNICAR or other radiative transfer models to predict the indirect darkening role of algal blooms, as other studies have done for LAPs in snow (Tuzet and others, Reference Tuzet2017; Huang and others, Reference Huang, Qian, He, Bair and Rittger2022).

Conclusions

The presented comprehension of research priorities demonstrates the need for an interdisciplinary approach combining biological, hydrological and geophysical tools to understand the supraglacial algal system and its implications for albedo reduction. Key research questions that should be addressed in future studies are:

  1. (i) under which conditions does liquid water limit glacier ice algal growth at the micro-scale?

  2. (ii) what is the viable and dead fraction of glacier ice algal populations throughout the season and how do environmental factors and microbial interactions (e.g. parasitic infections by fungi) impact those?

  3. (iii) what controls the rate of advection of algal cells from the ice surface to and through the hydrological system in the near-surface weathering crust?

  4. (iv) what is the impact of algal blooms on the state of the weathering crust?

Addressing these questions about the biological darkening of the Greenland Ice Sheet requires the combination of mechanistic and descriptive study approaches. The mechanistic approaches are essential to isolate the controls on algal growth and mortality and may include laboratory and/or field experiments (e.g. bottle incubations or in situ experiments as done on large scales by Ganey and others, Reference Ganey, Loso, Burgess and Dial2017). These need to be complemented with observations in the field to validate the interactions under ‘true’ in situ conditions during complex feedbacks with the weathering crust and other environmental processes of the algal habitat (Fig. 2). In addition, net algal biomass assessments by remote sensing must be combined with environmental data to identify the interaction between the algal-driven darkening and environmental variables at a larger scale. The assessments of the supraglacial algal system from a micro-to-macro-scale will improve its parametrisation within models and enable a better understanding and prediction of algal bloom development and associated albedo decline over space and time.

Acknowledgements

The presented work is part of the project DeepPurple which has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 856416). Alexandre Anesio and Martin Hansen received support from the Aarhus University Research Foundation (grant numbers AUFF-T-2017-FLS-7-4 and AUFF-2018). Liane G Benning acknowledges the support of the Helmholtz Recruiting Initiative (grant no. I-044-16-01).

Author contributions

LH and LC wrote together a major part of the manuscript. JC, IS, AA, LB and MT contributed to the discussion and helped to draft the final version of this manuscript.

References

Adam, B and 7 others (2016) N2-fixation, ammonium release and N-transfer to the microbial and classical food web within a plankton community. ISME Journal 10(2), 450459. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrien, NG (2004) Computational Hydraulics and Hydrology: An Introductory Guide for Field Biologists. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, PM and 5 others (2014) Assessing bare-ice albedo simulated by MAR over the Greenland ice sheet (2000–2021) and implications for meltwater production estimates. The Cryosphere 16, 41854199. doi: 10.5194/tc-16-4185-2022Google Scholar
Allgaier, M and 5 others (2022) Direct measurement of optical properties of glacier ice using a photon-counting diffuse LiDAR. J. Glaciol 68, 12101220. doi: 10.1017/jog.2022.34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antwerpen, R, Tedesco, M, Fettweis, X, Alexander, P and van de Berg, WJ (2022) Assessing bare Ice albedo simulated by MAR over the Greenland Ice Sheet (2000–2021) and implications for meltwater production estimates. The Cryosphere 16, 41854199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benning, LG, Anesio, AM, Lutz, S and Tranter, M (2014) Biological impact on Greenland's albedo. Nature Geoscience 7(10), 691691. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, N and 7 others (2022) Glacier ice surface properties in south-west Greenland ice sheet: first estimates from PRISMA imaging spectroscopy data. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences 127, e2021JG006718. doi: 10.1029/2021JG006718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briegleb, P and Light, B (2007) A Delta-Eddington Multiple Scattering Parameterization for Solar Radiation in the Sea Ice Component of the Community Climate System Model, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, technical note, 1108. doi: 10.5065/D6B27S71Google Scholar
Chevrollier, L-A and 6 others (2022) Light absorption and albedo reduction by pigmented microalgae on snow and ice. Journal of Glaciology 69(274), 19. doi: 10.1017/jog.2022.64.Google Scholar
Christner, BC and 9 others (2018) Microbial processes in the weathering crust aquifer of a temperate glacier. The Cryosphere 12(11), 36533669. doi: 10.5194/tc-12-3653-2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, JM and 9 others (2017) Quantifying bioalbedo: a new physically based model and discussion of empirical methods for characterising biological influence on ice and snow albedo. The Cryosphere 11(6), 26112632. doi: 10.5194/tc-11-2611-2017Google Scholar
Cook, JM and 23 others (2020) Glacier algae accelerate melt rates on the south-western Greenland Ice Sheet. The Cryosphere 14(1), 309330. doi: 10.5194/tc-14-309-2020Google Scholar
Cooper, MG and 7 others (2018) Meltwater storage in low-density near-surface bare ice in the Greenland ice sheet ablation zone. The Cryosphere 12, 955970. doi: 10.5194/tc-12-955-2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, HM and Kell, DB (1996) Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: the importance of single-cell analyses. Microbiological Reviews 60(4), 641696. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.4.641-696.1996CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Mauro, B and 8 others (2020) Glacier algae foster ice-albedo feedback in the European Alps. Scientific Reports 10, 19. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61762-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumont, M and 8 others (2014) Contribution of light-absorbing impurities in snow to Greenland's darkening since 2009. Nature Geoscience 7(7), 509512. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2180Google Scholar
Fausto, RS and 16 others (2021) Programme for monitoring of the Greenland Ice Sheet (PROMICE) automatic weather station data. Earth System Science Data 13, 38193845. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-3819-2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fettweis, X and 8 others (2017) Reconstructions of the 1900–2015 Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance using the regional climate MAR model. The Cryosphere 11(2), 10151033. doi: 10.5194/tc-11-1015-2017Google Scholar
Fiołka, MJ and 5 others (2021) Morphological and spectroscopic analysis of snow and glacier algae and their parasitic fungi on different glaciers of Svalbard. Scientific Reports 11(1), 118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01211-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanner, MG, Zender, CS, Randerson, JT and Rasch, PJ (2007) Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 112, 11202. doi: 10.1029/2006JD008003.Google Scholar
Ganey, GQ, Loso, MG, Burgess, AB and Dial, RJ (2017) The role of microbes in snowmelt and radiative forcing on an Alaskan icefield. Nature Geoscience 10, 754759. doi: 10.1038/NGEO3027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, K, Hutchins, DA and Beardall, J (2021) Research Methods of Environmental Physiology in Aquatic Sciences. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-5354-7Google Scholar
Grujcic, V, Taylor, GT and Foster, RA (2022) One cell at a time: advances in single-cell methods and instrumentation for discovery in aquatic microbiology. Frontiers in Microbiology 13(May). doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.881018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbach, L (2022) Nutrient requirements and pigment signatures of glacial algae on the Greenland Ice Sheet (Doctoral dissertation). Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Halbach, L and 14 others (2022) Pigment signatures of algal communities and their implications for glacier surface darkening. Scientific Reports (0123456789), 114. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22271-4Google Scholar
Hatzenpichler, R and 5 others (2016) Visualizing in situ translational activity for identifying and sorting slow-growing archaeal – bacterial consortia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(28), E4069E4078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603757113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, T and 5 others (2013) Greenland surface albedo changes in July 1981-2012 from satellite observations. Environmental Research Letters 8(4). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044043Google Scholar
Holland, AT and 10 others (2019) Dissolved organic nutrients dominate melting surface ice of the Dark Zone (Greenland ice sheet). Biogeosciences 16, 32833296. doi: 10.5194/bg-16-3283-2019Google Scholar
Huang, H, Qian, Y, He, C, Bair, EH and Rittger, K (2022) Snow albedo feedbacks enhance snow impurity-induced radiative forcing in the Sierra Nevada. Geophysical Research Letters 49(11), e2022GL098102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irvine-Fynn, TDL and 13 others (2021) Storage and export of microbial biomass across the western Greenland Ice Sheet. Nature Communications 12(1), 111. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24040-9Google Scholar
Klawonn, I and 10 others (2019) Untangling hidden nutrient dynamics: rapid ammonium cycling and single-cell ammonium assimilation in marine plankton communities. ISME Journal 13(8), 19601974. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0386-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klawonn, I and 6 others (2021b) Characterizing the “fungal shunt”: parasitic fungi on diatoms affect carbon flow and bacterial communities in aquatic microbial food webs. PNAS 118(23). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102225118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klawonn, I, Dunker, S, Kagami, M, Grossart, HP and Van den Wyngaert, S (2021a) Intercomparison of Two fluorescent dyes to visualize parasitic fungi (Chytridiomycota) on phytoplankton. Microbial Ecology 85, 923. doi: 10.1007/s00248-021-01893-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, K, Takeuchi, N and Kagami, M (2023) Distribution of parasitic chytrids of glacier algae in Alaska; cryoconite holes as a hotspot of chytrid infection. Scientific Reports 13. doi: 10.21203/RS.3.RS-2189377/V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, H, Hodson, A, Banwart, S and Bøggild, C (2010) The microstructure and biogeochemistry of Arctic cryoconite granules. Annals of Glaciology 51(56), 8794. doi: 10.3189/172756411795932083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, S, McCutcheon, J, McQuaid, J B and Benning, LG (2018) The diversity of ice algal communities on the Greenland Ice Sheet as revealed by oligotyping. Microbial Genomics 4, 110. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mader, HM, Pettitt, ME, Wadham, JL, Wolff, EW and Parkes, RJ (2006) Subsurface ice as a microbial habitat. Geology 34, 169172. doi: 10.1130/G22096.1Google Scholar
McCutcheon, J and 13 others (2021) Mineral phosphorus drives glacier algal blooms on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Nature Communications 12, 570. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20627-wGoogle Scholar
Noël, B and 11 others (2018) Modelling the climate and surface mass balance of polar ice sheets using RACMO2–Part 1: Greenland (1958–2016). The Cryosphere 12(3), 811831. doi: 10.5194/tc-12-811-2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolin, AW and Dozier, J (2000) A hyperspectral method for remotely sensing the grain size of snow. Remote Sensing of Environment 74(2), 207216. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00111-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuma, Y and 6 others (2022) Modeling seasonal growth of phototrophs on bare ice on the Qaanaaq Ice Cap, northwestern Greenland. Journal of Glaciology, 113. doi: 10.1017/jog.2022.76Google Scholar
Painter, TH and 5 others (2001) Detection and quantification of snow algae with an airborne imaging spectrometer. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67(11), 52675272. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.11.5267-5272.2001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perini, L and 5 others (2019) Darkening of the Greenland Ice Sheet: fungal abundance and diversity are associated with algal bloom. Frontiers in Microbiology 10(March), 557. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00557Google Scholar
Perini, L and 9 others (2022) Interactions of fungi and Algae from the Greenland Ice Sheet. Microbial Ecology (0123456789). doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-02033-5Google Scholar
Remias, D and 5 others (2012b) Characterization of an UV- and VIS-absorbing, purpurogallin-derived secondary pigment new to algae and highly abundant in Mesotaenium berggrenii (Zygnematophyceae, Chlorophyta), an extremophyte living on glaciers. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 79(3), 638648. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01245.xGoogle Scholar
Remias, D, Holzinger, A, Aigner, S and Lu, C (2012a) Ecophysiology and ultrastructure of Ancylonema nordenskioldii (Zygnematales, Streptophyta), causing brown ice on glaciers in Svalbard (high arctic), 35, 899908. doi: 10.1007/s00300-011-1135-6.Google Scholar
Ryan, JC and 7 others (2018) Dark zone of the Greenland Ice Sheet controlled by distributed biologically-active impurities. Nature Communications 9(1), 110. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03353-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuster, CJ (2001) Weathering crust processes on melting glacier ice (Alberta, Canada) (PhD Thesis). Wilfrid Laurier University. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027819Google Scholar
Stevens, IT and 8 others (2018) Near-surface hydraulic conductivity of northern hemisphere glaciers. Hydrological Processes 32, 850865. doi: 10.1002/hyp.11439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, IT and 11 others (2022) Spatially consistent microbial biomass and future cellular carbon release from melting Northern Hemisphere glacier surfaces. Communications Earth and Environment 3(1), 110. doi: 10.1038/s43247-022-00609-0Google Scholar
Stibal, M and 17 others (2017) Algae drive enhanced darkening of bare ice on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Geophysical Research Letters 44(22), 11,46311,471. doi: 10.1002/2017GL075958Google Scholar
Tedesco, M and 5 others (2016) The darkening of the Greenland ice sheet: trends, drivers, and projections (1981–2100). The Cryosphere 10(2), 477496. doi: 10.5194/TC-10-477-2016Google Scholar
Tedstone, AJ and others (2017) Dark ice dynamics of the south-west Greenland Ice Sheet. The Cryosphere 11(6), 24912506. doi: 10.5194/tc-11-2491-2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedstone, AJ and others (2020) Algal growth and weathering crust state drive variability in western Greenland Ice Sheet ice albedo. The Cryosphere 14(2), 521538. doi: 10.5194/TC-14-521-2020Google Scholar
Tuzet, F and 9 others (2017) A multilayer physically based snowpack model simulating direct and indirect radiative impacts of light-absorbing impurities in snow. The Cryosphere 11(6), 26332653. doi: 10.5194/tc-11-2633-2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S, Tedesco, M, Alexander, P, Xu, M and Fettweis, X (2020) Quantifying spatiotemporal variability of glacier algal blooms and the impact on surface albedo in southwestern Greenland. The Cryosphere 14, 26872713. doi: 10.5194/tc-14-2687-2020Google Scholar
Wang, S, Tedesco, M, Xu, M and Alexander, PM (2018) Mapping ice algal blooms in southwest Greenland from space. Geophysical Research Letters 45, 11,77911,788. doi: 10.1029/2018GL080455Google Scholar
Whicker, CA and 5 others (2022) SNICAR-ADv4: a physically based radiative transfer model to represent the spectral albedo of glacier ice. The Cryosphere 16(4), 11971220. doi: 10.5194/tc-16-1197-2022Google Scholar
Williamson, CJ and 8 others (2018) Ice algal bloom development on the surface of the Greenland Ice Sheet. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 94(3), 110. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy025Google Scholar
Williamson, CJ and 5 others (2019) Glacier Algae: a dark past and a darker future. Frontiers in Microbiology 10(April). doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, CJ and 11 others (2020) Algal photophysiology drives darkening and melt of the Greenland ice sheet. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 201918412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918412117.Google Scholar
Williamson, CJ and 5 others (2021) Macro-nutrient stoichiometry of glacier algae from the southwestern margin of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 18. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.673614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woods, T and Hewitt, IJ (2022) A model of the weathering crust and microbial activity on an ice-sheet surface. EGUsphere, [preprint]. doi: 10.5194/egusphere-2022-1086Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Pigments, light absorption and albedo reduction by glacier ice algae. (a) Microscope picture of Ancylonema alaskana, scale bar = 5 μm (b) average pigment composition of glacier ice algae, (c) picture of the weathering crust surface, (d) average absorption cross-section of glacier ice algae and (e) measured and modelled spectra of an ice surface colonised by glacier ice algae. Figures adapted from Halbach and others (2022) and Chevrollier and others (2022).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Schematic overview of the ice-algal system and key feedbacks with environmental variables and surface albedo. Note that not all interactions are included, for example among environmental variables. The incoming shortwave radiation available for the algae will also indirectly depend on the presence and properties of a snow cover.