Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T20:29:40.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal portfolio choice with tontines under systematic longevity risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2020

Irina Gemmo ,
Ralph Rogalla  and
Jan-Hendrik Weinert
Irina Gemmo*
Affiliation:
Chair of Integrative Risk Management and Economics, D-MTEC, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Ralph Rogalla
Affiliation:
Greenberg School of Risk Management, Insurance and Actuarial Science, Tobin College of Business, St John’s University, New York City, NY, USA
Jan-Hendrik Weinert
Affiliation:
Viridium Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: igemmo@ethz.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We derive optimal portfolio choice patterns in retirement (ages 66–105) for a constant relative risk aversion utility maximising investor facing risky capital market returns, stochastic mortality risk, and income-reducing health shocks. Beyond the usual stocks and bonds, the individual can invest his assets in tontines. Tontines are cost-efficient financial contracts providing age-increasing, but volatile cash flows, generated through the pooling of mortality without guarantees, which can help to match increasing financing needs at old ages. We find that a tontine invested in the risk-free asset dominates stock investments for older investors without a bequest motive. However, with a bequest motive, it is optimal to replace the tontine investment over time with traditional financial assets. Our results indicate that early in retirement, a tontine is only an attractive investment option, if the tontine funds are invested in a risky asset. In this case, they crowd out stocks and risk-free bonds in the optimal portfolios of younger investors. Over time, the average optimal portfolio weight of tontines decreases. Introducing systematic mortality risks noticeably reduces the peak allocation to tontines.

Keywords

TontinesMortalitySystematic longevity riskRetirement planningD14E21G22J10
Type
Paper
Information
Annals of Actuarial Science , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , September 2020 , pp. 302 - 315
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aït-Sahalia, Y. & Hurd, T.R. (2016). Portfolio choice in markets with contagion. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 14(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, M.W., Goyal, A., Santa-Clara, P. & Stroud, J.R. (2005). A simulation approach to dynamic portfolio choice with an application to learning about return predictability. The Review of Financial Studies, 18(3), 831–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, A.J., Blake, D. & Dowd, K. (2006). A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: theory and calibration. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(4), 687–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, A., Hieber, P. & Klein, J.K. (2019). Tonuity: a novel individual-oriented retirement plan. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 49(1), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocco, J.F., Gomes, F.J. & Maenhout, P.J. (2005). Consumption and portfolio choice over the life cycle. Review of Financial Studies, 18(2), 491–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Nardi, M., French, E. & Jones, J.B. (2010). Why do the elderly save? The role of medical expenses. Journal of Political Economy, 118(1), 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denault, M., Delage, E. & Simonato, J.-G. (2017). Dynamic portfolio choice: a simulation-and-regression approach. Optimization and Engineering, 18(2), 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denault, M. & Simonato, J.-G. (2017). Dynamic portfolio choices by simulation-and-regression: Revisiting the issue of value function vs portfolio weight recursions. Computers & Operations Research, 79, 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Y. (2020). Japan’s aging population breathes new life into a centuries-old investment idea. Wall Street Journal, 25-Feb-2020. Available online at the address https://www.wsj.com/articles/japans-aging-population-breathes-new-life- into-a-centuries-old-investment-idea-11582628400 [accessed 09-June-2020].Google Scholar
Horneff, V., Maurer, R., Mitchell, O.S. & Rogalla, R. (2015). Optimal life cycle portfolio choice with variable annuities offering liquidity and investment downside protection. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 63, 91–107.Google Scholar
Horneff, W., Maurer, R. & Rogalla, R. (2010). Dynamic portfolio choice with deferred annuities. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(11), 2652–2664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubener, A., Maurer, R. & Rogalla, R. (2014). Optimal portfolio choice with annuities and life insurance for retired couples. Review of Finance, 18(1), 147–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koijen, R.S., Nijman, T.E. & Werker, B.J. (2007). Appendix to: when can life cycle investors benefit from time-varying bond risk premia? Available online at the address https://netspar.nl/assets/uploads/nijmanwerker06017app.pdfGoogle Scholar
Koijen, R.S., Nijman, T.E. & Werker, B.J. (2010). When can life cycle investors benefit from time-varying bond risk premia? The Review of Financial Studies, 23(2), 741–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. & Rothschild, C. (2019). Selection and redistribution in the Irish tontines of 1773, 1775, and 1777. Journal of Risk and Insurance, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, R., Mitchell, O.S., Rogalla, R. & Kartashov, V. (2013). Lifecycle portfolio choice with systematic longevity risk and variable investment-linked deferred annuities. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 80(3), 649–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeever, K. (2009). Short history of tontines, Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law, 15, 491.Google Scholar
Milevsky, M.A. (2015). King William’s Tontine: Why the Retirement Annuity of the Future Should Resemble Its Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139879316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milevsky, M.A. & Salisbury, T.S. (2015). Optimal retirement income tontines. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 64, 91–105.Google Scholar
Milevsky, M.A. & Salisbury, T.S. (2016). Equitable retirement income tontines: mixing cohorts without discriminating. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 46(3), 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabin, M.J. (2010). Fair Tontine Annuity. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinert, J.-H. (2017a). Comparing the Cost of a Tontine with a Tontine Replicating Annuity. ICIR Working Paper Series (31/2017).Google Scholar
Weinert, J.-H. (2017b). The Fair Surrender Value of a Tontine. ICIR Working Paper Series (26/2017).Google Scholar
Weinert, J.-H. & Gründl, H. (2016). The Modern Tontine: An Innovative Instrument for Longevity risk Management in an Aging Society. ICIR Working Paper Series (22/2016).Google Scholar
World Bank (2015). Databank. Life expectancy at birth. Available online at the address http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.INGoogle Scholar