Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-t46fd Total loading time: 0.226 Render date: 2021-10-25T15:09:23.852Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Prediction uncertainties in the Cape Cod reserving method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Annina Saluz*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, RiskLab, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
*
*Correspondence to: Annina Saluz, Department of Mathematics, RiskLab, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland. Tel: +41 44 632 68 30; Fax: +41 44 632 15 23; E-mail: annina.saluz@math.ethz.ch

Abstract

The Cape Cod (CC) method was designed by Bühlmann and Straub in order to overcome some shortcomings of the chain ladder (CL) method. Owing to its simplicity and because of the advantages over the CL method, the CC method has become a well-established method in practice. In this paper we consider a distribution-free stochastic model for the CC method. Within this model we give the parameter estimates and we derive estimates for the conditional mean square error of prediction for the CC method. In addition, we derive an estimate for the uncertainty in the claims development result.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alai, D.H., Merz, M. & Wüthrich, M.V. (2010). Prediction uncertainty in the Bornhuetter-Ferguson claims reserving method: revisited. Annals of Actuarial Science, 5(1), 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornhuetter, R.L. & Ferguson, R.E. (1972). Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society. The actuary and IBNR. Proc. Cas, LIX, 181195.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, H., De Felice, M., Gisler, A., Moriconi, F. & Wüthrich, M.V. (2009). Recursive credibility formula for chain ladder factors and the claims development result. ASTIN Bulletin, 39(1), 275306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühlmann, H. & Straub, E. (1983). Estimation of IBNR Reserves by the Methods Chain Ladder, Cape Cod and Complementary Loss Ratio. International Summer School of the Swiss Association of Actuaries, Leysin, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Dal Moro, E. & Lo, J. (2014). An industry question: the ultimate and one-year reserving uncertainty for different non-life reserving methodologies. ASTIN Bulletin, 44(3), 495499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J. (2002). Stochastic claims reserving in general insurance. British Actuarial Journal, 8(3), 443518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FINMA (2006). Technisches Dokument zum Swiss Solvency Test, Version 02/10/2006, technical report, Bundesamt für Privatversicherungen, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Hachemeister, C. & Stanard, J. (1975). IBNR claims count estimation with static lag functions. ASTIN Colloquium, Portimao, Portugal. September 30 – October 3, 1975.Google Scholar
Mack, T. (1991). A simple parametric model for rating automobile insurance or estimating IBNR claims reserves. ASTIN Bulletin, 21(1), 93109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, T. (1993). Distribution-free calculation of the standard error of chain ladder reserve estimates. ASTIN Bulletin, 23(2), 213225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, T. (2006). Parameter estimation for Bornhuetter/Ferguson. CAS Forum, (Fall 2006), 141157.Google Scholar
Mack, T. (2008). The prediction error of Bornhuetter/Ferguson. ASTIN Bulletin, 38(1), 87103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merz, M. & Wüthrich, M.V. (2008). Modelling the claims development result for solvency purposes. CAS Forum, (Fall 2008), 542568.Google Scholar
Renshaw, A.E. & Verrall, R.J. (1998). A stochastic model for the chain ladder method. British Actuarial Journal, 14, 903923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saluz, A., Gisler, A. & Wüthrich, M.V. (2011). Development pattern and prediction error for the stochastic Bornhuetter-Ferguson claims reserving method. ASTIN Bulletin, 41(2), 279313.Google Scholar
Straub, E. (1988). Non-Life Insurance Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Association of Swiss Actuaries, Zürich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.C. (2002). Written discussion on the paper “Stochastic claims reserving in general insurance” by P. D. England and R. J. Verrall. British Actuarial Journal, 8(3), 540542.Google Scholar
Wüthrich, M.V. & Merz, M. (2008). Stochastic Claims Reserving Methods in Insurance. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Prediction uncertainties in the Cape Cod reserving method
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Prediction uncertainties in the Cape Cod reserving method
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Prediction uncertainties in the Cape Cod reserving method
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *