Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:11:27.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perches and elevated platforms in commercial broiler farms: use and effect on walking ability, incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia and bone mineral content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2016

E. Kaukonen ,
M. Norring  and
A. Valros
E. Kaukonen*
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, Research Centre for Animal Welfare, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
M. Norring
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, Research Centre for Animal Welfare, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
A. Valros
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, Research Centre for Animal Welfare, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
*
†E-mail: eija.kaukonen@helsinki.fi
Get access

Abstract

Modern fast-growing broilers spend excessive periods resting and their activity further decreases with age. Inactivity has been suggested to increase impaired gait and the incidence of leg disorders. Tibial dyschondroplasia (TD) is a common leg pathology in broilers. A more complex environment might facilitate more activity and improve leg health. Perches or elevated platforms bring variety to broilers’ environment and could motivate more locomotion. This study examined the impact of perches and elevated platforms on walking ability, the occurrence of TD and level of bone ash and mineral contents. The investigation was performed on four commercial broiler farms throughout six consecutive batches with platforms and four to five with perches. On each farm at least two separate houses were included, enabling the comparison of furnished flocks to control flocks during each batch. Plastic slats with ramp access elevated by 30 cm or wooden perches of 10 and 30 cm height were offered in the furnished house. Farmers recorded the platform and perch usage twice a week with a five-point scale. Gait was scored before slaughter on a six-point scale according to the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for poultry. The severity of TD was determined using a four-point scale on farm from all birds gait scored as 3 and at slaughter from 200 birds/flock. Farmers estimated 50% to 100% of the platforms to be occupied in all flocks throughout the entire growing period. Only single birds were perching, thus perch structures were constantly evaluated to be empty. Due to the low use, the perch-equipped houses were excluded when analysing bone content, walking ability and TD. On average, 30% of the tested birds exhibited gait score ⩾3. Younger scoring age resulted in a lower mean gait score and a lower percentage of scores 3 and 4 to 5. Overall, 2.3% of the birds examined at slaughter and 3.5% of the birds with gait score 3 were affected by TD. Leg health was better in birds with access to platforms: mean gait score, the percentage of birds scoring 3, and TD percentage and severity were lower in birds in platform-equipped houses. Elevated structures such as platforms, offering additional possibilities for locomotion to broilers seem to improve their leg health.

Keywords

broilerelevated platformsperchinggaittibial dyschondroplasia
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , May 2017 , pp. 864 - 871
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassler, AW, Arnould, C, Butterworth, A, Colin, L, De Jong, IC, Ferrante, V, Ferrari, P, Haslam, S, Wemelsfelder, F and Blokhuis, HJ 2013. Potential risk factors associated with contact dermatitis, lameness, negative emotional state, and fear of humans in broiler chicken flocks. Poultry Science 92, 2811–2826.Google Scholar
Bizeray, D, Estevez, I, Leterrier, C and Faure, JM 2002a. Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79, 27–41.Google Scholar
Bizeray, D, Estevez, I, Leterrier, C and Faure, JM 2002b. Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poultry Science 81, 767–773.Google Scholar
Bizeray, D, Leterrier, C, Constantin, P, Picard, M and Faure, JM 2002c. Sequential feeding can increase activity and improve gait score in meat-type chickens. Poultry Science 81, 1798–1806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danbury, TC, Weeks, CA, Chambers, JP, Waterman-Pearson, AE and Kestin, SC 2000. Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens. The Veterinary Record 146, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinev, I, Denev, SA and Edens, FW 2012. Comparative clinical and morphological studies on the incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia as a cause of lameness in three commercial lines of broiler chickens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 21, 637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, JM and Jones, RB 1982. Effects of sex, strain and type of perch on perching behaviour in the domestic fowl. Applied Animal Ethology 8, 281–293.Google Scholar
Garner, J, Falcone, C, Wakenell, P, Martin, M and Mench, J 2002. Reliability and validity of a modified gait scoring system and its use in assessing tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. British Poultry Science 43, 355–363.Google Scholar
Hongchao, J, Jiang, Y, Song, Z, Zhao, J, Wang, X and Lin, H 2014. Effect of perch type and stocking density on the behaviour and growth of broilers. Animal Production Science 54, 930–941.Google Scholar
Kapell, DN, Hill, WG, Neeteson, AM, McAdam, J, Koerhuis, AN and Avendano, S 2012. Twenty-five years of selection for improved leg health in purebred broiler lines and underlying genetic parameters. Poultry Science 91, 3032–3043.Google Scholar
Kestin, SC, Knowles, TG, Tinch, AE and Gregory, NG 1992. Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. The Veterinary Record 131, 190–194.Google Scholar
Kestin, SC, Su, G and Sorensen, P 1999. Different commercial broiler crosses have different susceptibilities to leg weakness. Poultry Science 78, 1085–1090.Google Scholar
Knowles, TG, Kestin, SC, Haslam, SM, Brown, SN, Green, LE, Butterworth, A, Pope, SJ, Pfeiffer, D and Nicol, CJ 2008. Leg disorders in broiler chickens: prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PLOS ONE 3, e1545.Google Scholar
Lynch, M, Thorp, BH and Whitehead, CC 1992. Avian tibial dyschondroplasia as a cause of bone deformity. Avian Pathology 21, 275–285.Google Scholar
Norring, M, Kaukonen, E and Valros, A 2016. The use of perches and platforms by broiler chickens. Retrieved on 29 July 2016 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.07.012 Google Scholar
Oester, H, Wiedmer, H and Witkowski, A 2005. Evaluation of elevated surfaces and perches for broilers. Animal Science Papers and Reports 23 (suppl. 1), 231–240.Google Scholar
Orth, MW and Cook, ME 1994. Avian tibial dyschondroplasia: a morphological and biochemical review of the growth plate lesion and its causes. Veterinary Pathology 31, 403–414.Google Scholar
Paxton, H, Daley, MA, Corr, SA and Hutchinson, JR 2013. The gait dynamics of the modern broiler chicken: a cautionary tale of selective breeding. The Journal of Experimental Biology 216, 3237–3248.Google Scholar
Pettit-Riley, R and Estevez, I 2001. Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71, 127–140.Google Scholar
Reiter, K and Bessei, W 2009. Effect of locomotor activity on leg disorder in fattening chicken. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 122, 264–270.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Feria, CA, Arroyo-Villegas, JJ, Pro-Martinez, A, Bautista-Ortega, J, Cortes-Cuevas, A, Narciso-Gaytan, C, Hernandez-Cazares, A and Gallegos-Sanchez, J 2014. Effects of distance and barriers between resources on bone and tendon strength and productive performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 93, 1608–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandusky, CL and Heath, JL 1988. Effect of age, sex, and barriers in experimental pens on muscle growth. Poultry Science 67, 1708–1716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanotra, G, Lund, JD and Vestergaard, K 2002. Influence of light-dark schedules and stocking density on behaviour, risk of leg problems and occurrence of chronic fear in broilers. British Poultry Science 43, 344–354.Google Scholar
Sanotra, GS, Berg, C and Lund, JD 2003. A comparison between leg problems in Danish and Swedish broiler production. Animal Welfare 12, 677–683.Google Scholar
Sanotra, GS, Lawson, LG, Vestergaard, KS and Thomsen, MG 2001. Influence of stocking density on tonic immobility, lameness, and tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 4, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherlock, L, Demmers, T, Goodship, AE, McCarthy, I and Wathes, CM 2010. The relationship between physical activity and leg health in the broiler chicken. British Poultry Science 51, 22–30.Google Scholar
Shim, MY, Karnuah, AB, Mitchell, AD, Anthony, NB, Pesti, GM and Aggrey, SE 2012. The effects of growth rate on leg morphology and tibia breaking strength, mineral density, mineral content, and bone ash in broilers. Poultry Science 91, 1790–1795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, G, Sorensen, P and Kestin, SC 1999. Meal feeding is more effective than early feed restriction at reducing the prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 78, 949–955.Google Scholar
Su, G, Sorensen, P and Kestin, SC 2000. A note on the effects of perches and litter substrate on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 79, 1259–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tablante, N, Estevez, I and Russek-Cohen, E 2003. Effect of perches and stocking density on tibial dyschondroplasia and bone mineralization as measured by bone ash in broiler chickens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 12, 53–59.Google Scholar
Thorp, B and Waddington, D 1997. Relationships between the bone pathologies, ash and mineral content of long bones in 35-day-old broiler chickens. Research in Veterinary Science 62, 67–73.Google Scholar
Ventura, BA, Siewerdt, F and Estevez, I 2012. Access to barrier perches improves behavior repertoire in broilers. PLOS ONE 7, e29826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vestergaard, KS and Sanotra, GS 1999. Relationships between leg disorders and changes in the behaviour of broiler chickens. The Veterinary Record 144, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weeks, C, Danbury, T, Davies, H, Hunt, P and Kestin, S 2000. The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welfare Quality® Consortium 2009. Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for poultry (broilers, laying hens). Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kaukonen supplementary material

Figure S1 and Table S1

Download Kaukonen supplementary material(File)
File 29.1 KB