Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:03:51.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pathological consequences of low atmospheric pressure stunning in broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2019

J. E. Martin Open the ORCID record for J. E. Martin [Opens in a new window] ,
D. E. F. McKeegan ,
D. L. Magee ,
N. Armour  and
D. G. Pritchard
J. E. Martin*
Affiliation:
The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, The College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Easter Bush Campus, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK
D. E. F. McKeegan
Affiliation:
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK
D. L. Magee
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, Poultry Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, Mississippi State University, P. O. Box 97813, Pearl, MS 39288-7813, USA
N. Armour
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, Poultry Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, Mississippi State University, P. O. Box 97813, Pearl, MS 39288-7813, USA
D. G. Pritchard
Affiliation:
Consultant Animal Welfare Science and Practice, Tulip House, 70 Borough High Street London Bridge, London SE1 1XF, UK
*
†E-mail: jessica.martin@ed.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Low atmospheric pressure stunning (LAPS) is a novel approach to pre-slaughter stunning of chickens using progressive hypobaric hypoxia by the application of gradual decompression (280s cycle) according to a set of prescribed pressure curves. Low atmospheric pressure stunning produces a non-recovery state. Concerns have been raised relating to the possible pathological and welfare consequences of expansion of air in the body during LAPS. In a randomised trial, we compared the gross pathology of broilers exposed to LAPS with a control group euthanised by intravenous injection of pentobarbital sodium (60 mixed sex broilers per treatment). The birds were exposed to each treatment in triplets and all birds were subject to necropsy examination to detect and score (1 to 5, minimal to severe) haemorrhagic lesions or congestion for all major organs and cavities (e.g. air sacs, joints, ears and heart) as well as external assessment for product quality (e.g. wing tips). Behavioural data (latency to loss of posture and motionless) and chamber cycle data (temperature, humidity, pressure and oxygen availability) confirmed that LAPS had been applied in a manner representative of the commercial process. All of the organs observed were structurally intact for both treatment groups. No lesions were observed in the external ears, oral cavity, tracheal lumen, crop and air sacs of birds from either treatment group. There was no difference between treatments in the wingtips, nasal turbinates, thymus, biceps femoralis and colon. Haemorrhagic lesions were observed in the calvaria, brains, hearts and lungs of both treatment groups, but lesions in these areas were more severe in the LAPS treatment group. It was not possible to distinguish between pathological changes induced by decompression or recompression. In the barbiturate group, more severe haemorrhagic lesions were observed in the superficial pectoral muscles as well as greater congestion of the infraorbital sinuses, liver, spleens, duodenum, kidneys and gonads. These findings provide evidence that LAPS did not result in distension of the intestines and air sacs sufficient to cause changes, which were grossly visible on postmortem examination. There was also no evidence of barotrauma in the ears and sinuses. The pathological changes observed in the barbiturate treatment were as expected based on barbiturate toxicity. Low atmospheric pressure stunning appears to produce pathological changes by a variety of well-established mechanisms, and while these pathological data have limited value as welfare indicators, the results confirm that organ integrity was not compromised by the process.

Keywords

Hypobaric hypoxiapoultryproduct qualityslaughteranimal welfare
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 129 - 137
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeysinghe, SM, McKeegan, DEF, McLeman, MA, Lowe, JC, Demmers, TGM, White, RP, Kranen, RW, Bemmel, H, Lankhaar, JAC and Wathes, CM 2007. Controlled atmosphere stunning of broiler chickens. I. Effects on behaviour, physiology and meat quality in a pilot scale system at a processing plant. British Poultry Science 48, 406–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) 2013. Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. American Veterinary Medical Association, ISBN 978-1-882691-21-0. Retrieved on 15 April 2016 from https://www.avma.org/KB/Policies/Documents/euthanasia.pdf Google Scholar
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) 2016. Guidelines for the Humane Slaughter of Animals. American Veterinary Medical Association, ISBN 978-1-882691-07-4. Retrieved on 15 April 2016 from https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/Reference/AnimalWelfare/Documents/Humane-Slaughter-Guidelines.pdf Google Scholar
Astrup, P 1972. Some physiological and pathological effects of moderate carbon monoxide exposure. British Medical Journal 25, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankcroft, RW, Cooke, JP and Cain, SM 1968. Comparison of anoxia with and without ebullism. Journal of Applied Physiology 25, 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankcroft, RW and Dunn, JE 1965. Experimental animal decompressions to a near vacuum environment. Aerospace Medicine 36, 720–725.Google Scholar
Battula, V, Schilling, MW, Vizzier-Thaxton, Y, Behrends, JM, Williams, JB and Schmidt, TB 2008. The effects of low-atmosphere stunning and deboning time on broiler breast meat quality. Poultry Science 87, 1202–1210.Google ScholarPubMed
Booth, NH 1978. Effect of rapid decompression and associated hypoxic phenomena in euthanasia of animals: a review. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 173, 308–314.Google ScholarPubMed
Burch, BH, Kemph, JP, Vail, EG, Frye, SA and Hitchcock, FA 1952. Some effects of explosive decompression to 30 mmHg upon the hearts of dogs. Journal of Aviation Medicine 23, 159–167.Google Scholar
Catron, PW, Flynn, ET Jr, Yaffe, L, Bradley, ME, Thomas, LB, Hinman, D, Survanshi, S, Johnson, JT and Harrington, J 1984. Morphological and physiological responses of the lungs of dogs to acute decompression. Journal of Applied Physiology 57, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheek, H and Cattaruzzi, B 2017. Method for humanely stunning and slaughtering animals using low atmospheric pressure and inert gas. United States Patent US2017/0231237A1. Retrieved on 10 April 2015 from =https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170231237A1/en?oq=US+2017%2f0231237A1 Google Scholar
Dunn, JE, Bancroft, RW, Haymaker, W and Foft, JW 1965. Experimental animal decompressions to less than 2 mmHg absolute (patho-logic effects). Aerospace Medicine 36, 725–732.Google Scholar
Edelman, A, Whitehorn, WV and Lein, A 1946. Pathological lesions produced by explosive decompression. Aviation Medicine 17, 596–612.Google Scholar
European Council 2018. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/723 of 16 May 2018 amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing as regards the approval of low atmospheric pressure stunning. Official Journal of the European Union L 122/11 – L123/11. Retrieved on 20 May 2018 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2018/723/oj Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2017. Scientific opinion on the low atmospheric pressure system for stunning broiler chickens. European Food Safety Authority Journal 15, 5056–5086.Google Scholar
Food Chain Evaluation Consortium (FCEC) 2008. Food chain evaluation consortium study on stunning/killing practices in slaughterhouses: final report – Part II: Poultry meat. Retrieved on 20 July 2018 from http://edz.bib.uni-mannheim.de/daten/edz-a/gdgv/12/study_stunning_poultry_en.pdf Google Scholar
Greenwald, AJ, Allen, TH and Bancroft, RW 1969. Abdominal gas volume at altitude and at ground level. Journal of Applied Physiology 26, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grieves, JL, Dick, EJ, Schlabritz-Loutsevich, NE, Butler, SD, Leland, CR, Price, MM, Schmidt, SE, Nathanielsz, PW and Hubbard, GB 2007. Barbiturate euthanasia solution-induced tissue artifact in nonhuman primates. Journal of Medical Primatology 37, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J and Sander, M 2003. Sympathetic neural overactivity in healthy humans after prolonged exposure to hypobaric hypoxia. The Journal of Physiology 546, 921–929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holloway, PH and Pritchard, DG 2017. Effects of ambient temperature and water vapor on chamber pressure and oxygen level during low atmospheric pressure stunning of poultry. Poultry Science 96, 2528–2539.Google ScholarPubMed
Joseph, P, Schilling, MW, Williams, JB, Radhakrishnan, V, Battula, V, Christensen, K, Vizzier-Thaxton, Y and Schmidt, TB 2013. Broiler stunning methods and their effects on welfare, rigor mortis and meat quality. World Poultry Science Association 67, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, C and Ling, EA 2008. Blood brain barrier in hypoxic-ischemic conditions. Current Neurovascular Research 5, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kummerfeld, N, Legler, M, Wohlsein, P and Kummerfeld, M 2012. Morphological studies in different avian species on artefacts induced by euthanasia with T61 or Pentobarbital (Narcoren). Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift 125, 27–31.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, LJ 1986. Necropsy procedures. In Clinical avian medicine and surgery (ed. Harrison, GJ and Harrison, LR), pp. 298–309. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Martin, JE, Christiansen, K, Vizzier-Thaxton, Y and McKeegan, DEF 2016a. Effects of analgesic intervention on behavioural responses to low atmospheric pressure stunning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 180, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, JE, Christiansen, K, Vizzier-Thaxton, Y and McKeegan, DEF 2016b. Effects of light on responses to low atmospheric pressure stunning in broilers. British Poultry Science 57, 585–600.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, JE, Christiansen, K, Vizzier-Thaxton, Y, Mitchell, MA and McKeegan, DEF 2016c. Behavioural, brain and cardiac responses to hypobaric hypoxia in broiler chickens. Physiology and Behavior 163, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGavin, MD and Zachary, JF 2016. Pathologic basis of veterinary disease, 6th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO, USA.Google Scholar
McKeegan, DEF, Abyesinghe, SM, McLeman, MA, Lowe, JC, Demmers, TGM, White, RP, Kranen, RW, Bemmel, H, Lankhaar, JAC and Wathes, CM 2007. Controlled atmosphere stunning of broiler chickens. II. Effects on behaviour, physiology and meat quality in a commercial processing plant. British Poultry Science, 48, 430–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeegan, DEF, Reimert, HGM, Hindle, VA, Boulcott, P, Sparrey, JM, Wathes, CM, Demmers, TGM and Gerritzen, MA 2013a. Physiological and behavioral responses of poultry exposed to gas-filled high expansion foam. Poultry Science 92, 1145–1154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeegan, DEF, Sandercock, DA and Gerritzen, MA 2013b. Physiological responses to low atmospheric pressure stunning (LAPS) and their implications for welfare. Poultry Science 92, 858–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michiels, C 2004. Physiological and pathological responses to hypoxia. The American Journal of Pathology 164, 1895–1882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, R and Munro, HM 2013. Some challenges in forensic veterinary pathology: a review. Journal of Comparative Pathology 149, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, DH, Pilmanis, AA, Blue, RS, Pattarini, JM, Law, J, Bayne, CG, Turney, MW and Clark, JB 2013. The pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of ebullism. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 88, 89–96.Google Scholar
Nakajima, W, Ishida, A, Lange, MS, Gabrielson, KL, Wilson, MA, Martin, LJ, Blue, ME and Johnston, MV 2000. Apoptosis has a prolonged role in the neurodegeneration after hypoxic ischemia in the newborn rat. Journal of Neuroscience 20, 7994–8004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northcutt, J, Buhr, R and Rowland, G 2000. Relationship of broiler bruise age to appearance and tissue histological characteristics. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 9, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northcutt, JK, Savage, SI and Vest, LR 1997. Relationship between feed withdrawal and viscera condition of broilers. Poultry Science 76, 410–414.Google ScholarPubMed
Purswell, JL, Thaxton, JP and Branton, SL 2007. Identifying process variables for a low atmospheric pressure stunning-killing system. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16, 509–513.Google Scholar
Schilling, MW, Radhakrishnan, V, Vizzier-Thaxton, Y, Christensen, K, Joseph, P, Williams, JB and Schmidt, TB 2012. The effects of low atmosphere stunning and deboning time on broiler breast meat quality. Poultry Science 12, 3214–3222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, S 2005. Subendocardial hemorrhages. In Forensic pathology reviews (ed. Tsokos, M), volume 2, Chapter 13, pp. 293–306. Humana Press, New York City, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Sparks, NHC and Sandilands, V, Raj, ABM, Turney, E, Pennycott, T and Voas, A 2010. Use of liquid carbon dioxide for whole-house gassing of poultry and implications for the welfare of the birds. Veterinary Record 167, 403–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparrey, JM, Kettlewell, PJ 1994. Shackling of poultry: is it a welfare problem? World’s Poultry Science Journal 50, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Liere, EJ 1943. Anoxia: its effect on the body. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Vizzier-Thaxton, Y, Christensen, KD, Shilling, MW, Buhr, RJ and Thaxton, JP 2010. A new humane method of stunning broilers using low atmospheric pressure. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 19, 341–348.Google Scholar
West, JB, Schoene, RB and Milledge, JS 2007. High altitude medicine and physiology, 4th edition. Hodder Arnold, London, UK.Google Scholar
Woodrow, AD and Webb, JT 2011. Handbook of Aerospace and Operational Physiology. AFRL-SA-WP-SR-2011-0003. Air Force Research Laboratory 711th Human Performance Wing; School of Aerospace Medicine; Aerospace Medicine Education, Chapter 7.2. Retrieved on 15 April 2016 from https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a548404.pdf.Google Scholar
Zuidhof, MJ, McGovern, RH, Schneider, BL, Feddes, JJ, Robinson, FE, Korver, DR and Goonewardene, LA 2004. Effects of feed withdrawal and livehaul on body weight, gut clearance, and contamination of broiler carcasses. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13, 472–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar