Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:41:24.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gait assessment in dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

F. C. Flower  and
D. M. Weary
F. C. Flower
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4
D. M. Weary*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4
*
E-mail: danweary@interchange.ubc.ca
Get access

Abstract

Lameness is one of the most important dairy cow welfare issues and has inspired a growing body of literature on gait assessment. Validation studies have shown that several methods of gait assessment are able to successfully distinguish cows with and without painful pathologies. While subjective methods provide an immediate, on-site assessment and require no technical equipment, they show variation in observer reliability. On the other hand, objective methods of gait assessment provide accurate and reliable data, but typically require sophisticated technology, limiting their use on farms. In this critical review, we evaluate gait assessment methods, discuss the reliability and validity of measures used to date, and point to areas where new research is needed. We show how gait can be affected by hoof and leg pathologies, treatment of these ailments and the pain associated with lameness. We also discuss how cow (e.g. conformation, size and udder fill) and environmental features (e.g. flooring) contribute to variation in the way cows walk. An understanding of all these factors is important to avoid misclassifying of cows and confounding comparisons between herds.

Keywords

cattlelamenesslocomotionvaliditywelfare
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 87 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrey, E 1999. Methods, applications and limitations of gait analysis in horses. Veterinary Journal 157, 7–22.Google Scholar
Bergsten, C 1994. Haemorrhages of the sole horn of dairy cows as a retrospective indicator of laminitis: an epidemiological study. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 35, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicalho, RC, Cheong, SH, Cramer, G, Guard, CL 2007. Association between a visual and an automated locomotion score in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3294–3300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenninkmeyer, C, Dippel, S, March, S, Brinkmann, J, Winckler, C, Knierim, U 2007. Reliability of a subjective lameness scoring system for dairy cows. Animal Welfare 16, 127–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchner, F, Kastner, J, Girtler, D, Knezevic, PF 1993. Quantification of hind limb lameness in the horse. Acta Anatomica 146, 196–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchner, HH, Savelberg, HH, Schamhardt, HC, Barneveld, A 1996. Limb movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore- or hind-limb lameness. Equine Veterinary Journal 28, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarkson, MJ, Downham, DY, Faull, WB, Hughes, JW, Manson, FJ, Merritt, JB, Murray, RD, Russell, WB, Sutherst, JE, Ward, WR 1996. Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Record 138, 563–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corr, SA, McCorquodale, CC, Gentle, MJ 1998. Gait analysis of poultry. Research in Veterinary Science 65, 233–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corr, SA, McCorquodale, CC, McGovern, RE, Gentle, MJ, Bennett, D 2003. Evaluation of ground reaction forces produced by chickens walking on a force plate. American Journal of Veterinary Research 64, 76–82.Google Scholar
Dijkman, JT, Lawrence, PR 1997. The energy expenditure of cattle and buffaloes walking and working in different soil conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 128, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döpfer, D, Koopmans, A, Meijer, FA, Szakáll, I, Schukken, YH, Klee, W, Bosma, RB, Cornelisse, JL, van Asten, AJAM, ter Huurne, AAHM 1997. Histological and bacteriological evaluation of digital dermatitis in cattle, with special reference to spirochaetes and Campylobacter faecalis. The Veterinary Record 140, 620–623.Google Scholar
Dyer, RM, Neerchal, NK, Tasch, U, Wu, Y, Dyer, P, Rajkondawar, PG 2007. Objective determination of claw pain and its relationship to limb locomotion score in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4592–4602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espejo, LA, Endres, MI, Salfer, JA 2006. Prevalence of lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3052–3058.Google Scholar
Flower FC and Weary DM 2002. Lameness assessment in dairy cows: a comparison of quantitative and qualitative approaches. The Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Lameness in Ruminants, Orlando, USA, p. 416.Google Scholar
Flower, FC, Weary, DM 2006. Hoof pathologies influence subjective assessments of dairy cow gait. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, FC, Sanderson, DJ, Weary, DM 2005. Hoof pathologies influence kinematic measures of dairy cow gait. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 3166–3173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flower, FC, Sanderson, DJ, Weary, DM 2006. Effects of milking on dairy cow gait. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2084–2089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flower, FC, de Passillé, AM, Weary, DM, Sanderson, DJ, Rushen, J 2007. Softer, higher-friction flooring improves gait of cows with and without sole ulcers. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1235–1242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flower, FC, Sedlbauer, M, Carter, E, von Keyerslingk, MAG, Sanderson, DJ, Weary, DM 2008. Analgesics improve the gait of lame dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0968 91, 3010–3014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, J, Falcone, C, Wakenell, P, Martin, M, Mench, J 2002. Reliability and validity of a modified gait scoring system and its use in assessing tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. British Poultry Science 43, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentle, MJ, Corr, SA 1995. Endogenous analgesia in the chicken. Neuroscience Letters 201, 211–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, LE, Hedges, VJ, Schukken, YH, Blowey, RW, Packington, AJ 2002. The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2250–2256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenough, PR, McDaniel, BT, Leipold, HW 1997. Conformation, growth and heritable factors. In Lameness in cattle (ed. PR Greenough and AD Weaver), pp. 71–86. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Hall, S 1995. Basic biomechanics, 2nd edition. Mosby, St Louis.Google Scholar
Herlin, AH, Drevemo, S 1997. Investigating locomotion of dairy cows by use of high speed cinematography. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 23, 106–109.Google Scholar
Hernandez, JA, Garbarino, EJ, Shearer, JK, Risco, CA, Thatcher, WW 2005. Comparison of the calving-to-conception interval in dairy cows with different degrees of lameness during the prebreeding postpartum period. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 227, 1284–1291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez-Mendo, O, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Veira, DM, Weary, DM 2007. Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1209–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollenbeck, AR 1978. Problems of reliability in observational research. In Observing behaviour, vol. II. Data collection and analysis methods (ed. GP Sackett), pp. 79–98. University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Holzhauer, M, Bartels, CJM, van den Borne, BHP, van Schaik, G 2006. Intra-class correlation attributable to claw trimmers scoring common hind-claw disorders in Dutch dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 75, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keegan, KG, Pai, PF, Wilson, DA, Smith, BK 2001. Signal decomposition method of evaluating head movement to measure induced forelimb lameness in horses trotting on a treadmill. Equine Veterinary Journal 33, 446–451.Google Scholar
Kestin, SC, Knowles, TG, Tinch, AE, Gregory, NG 1992. Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. The Veterinary Record 131, 190–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Main, DCJ, Clegg, J, Spatz, A, Green, LE 2000. Repeatability of a lameness scoring system for finishing pigs. The Veterinary Record 147, 574–576.Google Scholar
Manson FJ 1986. A study of lameness in dairy cows with reference to nutrition and hoof care. PhD, The University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Manson, FJ, Leaver, JD 1988. The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 47, 185–190.Google Scholar
March, S, Brinkmann, J, Winckler, C 2007. Effect of training on the inter-observer reliability of lameness scoring in dairy cattle. Animal Welfare 16, 131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P, Bateson, P 1998. Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Merkens, HW, Schamhardt, HC, Hartman, W, Kersjes, AW 1985. Ground reaction forces of Dutch Warm blood horses at normal walk. Equine Veterinary Journal 18, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, TR 1999. Experimental design and analysis in animal sciences. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Morrow, DA 1966. Laminitis in cattle. Veterinary Medicine, Small Animal Clinician 61, 138–146.Google Scholar
Neveux S 2005. Hoof pain changes how dairy cattle change their body weight. MSc, The University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Neveux, S, Weary, DM, Rushen, J, von Keyserlingk, MAG, de Passillé, AM 2006. Hoof discomfort changes how dairy cattle distribute their body weight. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2503–2509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nikkhah, A, Plazier, JC, Einarson, MS, Berry, RJ, Scott, SL, Kennedy, AD 2005. Infrared thermography and visual examination of hooves of dairy cows in two stages of lactaction. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2749–2753.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, K 2002. Lameness and associated pain in cattle – challenging traditional perspectives. In Practice 24, 214–219.Google Scholar
Pastell, ME, Kujala, M 2007. A probabilistic neural network model for lameness detection. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 2283–2292.Google Scholar
Peham, C, Licka, T, Girtler, D, Scheidl, M 2001. Hindlimb lameness: clinical judgement versus computerised symmetry measurement. The Veterinary Record 148, 750–752.Google Scholar
Peloso, JG, Stick, JA, Soutas-Little, RW, Caron, JC, DeCamp, CE, Leach, DH 1993. Computer-assisted three-dimensional gait analysis of amphotericin-induced carpal lameness in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 54, 1535–1543.Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC, Morris, ID 2001. The locomotion of dairy cows on floor surfaces with different frictional properties. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 623–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrynowski, MR, Galea, V 2001. Enhancing the ability of gait analyses to differentiate between groups: scaling gait data to body size. Gait and Posture 13, 193–201.Google Scholar
Platz, S, Ahrens, F, Bahrs, E, Nüske, S, Erhard, MH 2007. Association between floor type and behaviour, skin lesions, and claw dimensions in group-housed fattening bulls. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 80, 209–221.Google Scholar
Rajkondawar PG, Erez B, Neerchal NK, Lefcourt AM, Dyer RM, Varner MA and Tasch U 2002. The development of an objective lameness scoring system for dairy herds – pilot study. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Lameness in Ruminants, Orlando, USA, pp. 411–414. .Google Scholar
Rajkondawar, PG, Liu, M, Dyer, RM, Neerchal, NK, Tasch, U, Lefcourt, AM, Erez, B, Varner, MA 2006. Comparison of models to identify lame cows based on gait and lesion scores, and limb movement variables. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4267–4275.Google Scholar
Roepstorff, L, Drevemo, S 1993. Concept of a force-measuring horseshoe. Acta Anatomica 146, 114–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushen J, Pombourcq E and de Passillé AM 2007. Validation of two measures of lameness in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 106, 173–177.Google Scholar
Schamhardt, HC, van den Bogert, AJ, Hartman, W 1993. Measurement techniques in animal locomotion analysis. Acta Anatomica 146, 123–129.Google Scholar
Scott, GB 1988. Studies of the gait of Friesian heifer cattle. The Veterinary Record 123, 245–248.Google Scholar
Scott, J, Huskisson, EC 1976. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2, 175–184.Google Scholar
Smits, MCJ, Frankena, K, Metz, JHM, Noordhuizen, JPTM 1992. Prevalence of digital disorders in zero-grazing dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 32, 231–244.Google Scholar
Somers, JGCJ, Frankena, K, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Metz, JHM 2003. Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2082–2093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somers, JGCJ, Frankena, K, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Metz, JHM 2005. Risk factors for interdigital dermatitis and heel erosion in dairy cows kept in cubicle housing in The Netherlands. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 71, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprecher, DJ, Hostetler, DE, Kaneene, JB 1997. A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. Theriogenology 47, 1179–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Telezhenko, E, Bergsten, C 2005. Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93, 183–197.Google Scholar
van Eerdenburg FJ, de Boer H and Gomez F 2003. Relationship among subclinical lameness and oestrus expression. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of the International Society of Animal Hygiene, Mexico City, pp. 211–216. .Google Scholar
Van der Tol, PPJ, Metz, JHM, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Back, W, Braam, CR, Weijs, WA 2002. The pressure distribution under the bovine claw during square standing on a flat substrate. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1476–1481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Weeren, PR, van den Bogert, AJ, Barneveld, A 1988. Quantification of skin displacement near the carpal, tarsal and fetlock joints of the walking horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 20, 203–208.Google Scholar
Vokey, FJ, Guard, CL, Erb, HN, Galton, DM 2001. Effects of alley and stall surfaces on indices of claw and leg health in dairy cattle housed in a free-stall barn. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 2686–2699.Google Scholar
Wells, SJ, Garber, LP, Wagner, BA 1999. Papillomatous digital dermatitis and associated risk factors in US dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 38, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, EM, Gettinby, G, Nolan, AM 1993. Comparison of a visual analogue scale and a numerical rating scale for assessment of lameness, using sheep as a model. American Journal of Veterinary Research 54, 976–983.Google Scholar
Whay, HR 2002. Locomotion scoring and lameness detection in dairy cattle. In Practice 24, 444–449.Google Scholar
Whay, HR, Waterman, AE, Webster, AJF 1997. Associations between locomotion, claw lesions and nociceptive threshold in dairy heifers during the peri-partum period. Veterinary Journal 154, 155–161.Google Scholar
Whay, HR, Waterman, AE, Webster, AJF, O’Brien, JK 1998. The influence of lesion type on the duration of hyperalgesia associated with hindlimb lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Journal 156, 23–29.Google Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE, Webster, AJF 2003. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. The Veterinary Record 153, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winckler, C, Willen, S 2001. The reliability and repeatability of a lameness scoring system for use as an indicator of welfare in dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A (Supplement) 30, 103–107.Google Scholar