Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-65dc7cd545-jbgjn Total loading time: 1.03 Render date: 2021-07-23T15:04:31.631Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Editorial: Greenhouse gases in animal agriculture: science supporting practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2020

A. Berndt
Affiliation:
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Southeast Livestock), Rod. Washington Luiz, km234, CP339, São Carlos, São Paulo13560-970, Brazil
A. L. Abdalla
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo (CENA-USP), Av. Centenário, 303 - São Dimas, Piracicaba, São Paulo13416-000, Brazil
L. G. R. Pereira
Affiliation:
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Dairy Cattle), Av. Eugênio do Nascimento, 610, Aeroporto, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais36038-330, Brazil
Corresponding

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Animal Consortium

The populational growth, the increase of demand for livestock product, the technological progress, the changes in income distribution, concerns related to climate change and environment have been driving the scientific community to develop knowledge regarding sustainable animal agriculture. Climate change represents a significant threat, with an estimated increase of the average global temperature at the end of the 21st century (compared with 1980 to 1999) between 1.8°C (B1 scenario) and 4.0°C (A1FI scenario) (IPCC, 2007). This shift in temperature represents a direct and indirect impact on agriculture systems as well as on human and animal health. Animal agriculture sustainable production systems can present key solutions in a changing climate, at the same time as reducing its impact so as not to aggravate it further (Gaughan et al., Reference Gaughan, Sejian, Mader and Dunshea2019).

In this context, the Greenhouse Gas and Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA) is the premier international conference summarizing the collective state of scientific knowledge on greenhouse gas abatement strategies and production systems adaptation needs for the livestock sector. This gathering features leading scientists and policymakers reviewing the current state of knowledge and presenting significant new developments in policy, measurement, modelling, mitigation and adaptation efforts associated with greenhouse gases from animal agriculture.

The Conference took place every 2 years in the first three editions and every 3 years since 2010 when the main abstracts were published as full article in special issues of peer-reviewed journals (McAllister et al., Reference McAllister, Beauchemin, McGinn, Hao and Robinson2011; Dewhurst, Reference Dewhurst2013; Eckard, Reference Eckard2016). Finally, GGAA2019 happened for the first time in Latin America, which focused on the theme ‘Science supporting Practices’.

At the GGAA2019 conference, held in Iguassu Falls, Brazil, almost 200 delegates from 39 countries gathered to participate in a program featuring 11 invited keynote speakers, 47 offered presentations and 111 poster presentations. Of the 158 papers presented at the Iguassu Falls, 7 were selected and survived critical review and are in this Special Issue. The 7th meeting in the series was organized in Brazil in August 2019, jointly by Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation—Embrapa, University of São Paulo—USP, São Paulo State University—UNESP, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias—INIA/Chile and Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria—INTA/Argentina.

Despite the fact that the countries located in the tropical belt of the Earth are important players for worldwide food production, there were gaps related to carbon balance and specific models for enteric methane predictions in tropical livestock production systems as pointed in GGAA 2013 by Berndt and Tomkins (Reference Berndt and Tomkins2013). This Special Issue addresses these gaps in the Oliveira et al (Reference Oliveira, Berndt, Pedroso, Alves, Pezzopane, Sakamoto, Henrique and Rodrigues2020) paper that showed the effects of intensification of tropical pastures on carbon balance and by Ribeiro et al. (Reference Ribeiro, Rodrigues, Mauricio, Borges, Berchielli, Valadares Filho, Machado, Campos, Tomich and Pereira2020) that compiled a database of CH4 emissions to evaluate prediction precision and accuracy of extant equations and to develop novel equations for predicting enteric methane emissions from cattle in tropical conditions. Furthermore, Ku-Vera et al. (Reference Ku-Vera, Castelán-Ortega, Galindo-Maldonado, Arango, Chirinda, Jiménez-Ocampo, Valencia-Salazar, Flores-Santiago, Montoya-Flores, Molina-Botero, Piñeiro-Vázquez, Arceo-Castillo, Aguilar-Pérez, Ramírez-Avilés and Solorio-Sánchez2020) reviewed the strategies for enteric methane mitigation in cattle fed low-quality tropical forages.

During the GGAA meetings, it was possible to observe the increase in options for dietary strategies with the potential to mitigate enteric methane, with emphasis on the use of vegetable oils (Ludemann et al., Reference Ludemann, Howden and Eckard2016), secondary compounds (Samal et al., Reference Samal, Chaudhary, Agarwal and Kamra2016), nitrate (Guyader et al., Reference Guyader, Tavendale, Martin and Muetzel2016) and 3-nitrooxypropanol evidenced by the 10 papers published in GGAA2019 (Berndt et al. Reference Berndt, Pereira and Abdalla2019). In this special edition, Williams et al. (Reference Williams, Hannah, Eckard, Wales and Moate2020) showed the positive effects of the association of fat or tannin to reduce methane yield in dairy cattle.

There has been growing interest in the potential to breed ruminants for reduced CH4 emissions and Lassen and Difford (Reference Lassen and Difford2020) discussed the genetic and genomic selection as a methane mitigation strategy in dairy cattle. Regarding the advances in techniques to measure enteric CH4, Hristov and Melgar (Reference Hristov and Melgar2020) demonstrated that the relationship of enteric methane emission measured using Green Feed and Dry Mater Intake in dairy cows depends on the time of measurement relative to the time of feeding. Therefore, a sufficient number of gas samples, covering the entire 24-h feeding cycle, have to be collected to have representative emission estimates using the green feed system.

Finally, the review ‘Climate Finance and the Livestock Sector’ by Masse and Gerber (Reference Masse and Gerber2020) showed the challenges and opportunities to encourage sustainable livestock practices.

A special word of thanks is due to the guests editing the papers in this Special Issue. They are Dr Karen A. Beauchemin, Dr Patricia Ricci and Dr Tim McAllister.

Acknowledgements

The Local Organizing Committee is comprised of Dr Alexandre Berndt (Embrapa Southeast Livestock), Dr Luiz Gustavo R. Pereira (Embrapa Dairy Cattle), Dr Adibe Luis Abdalla (CENA/USP), Dr Marta Alfaro Valenzuela (INIA), Dr Jose Ignacio Arroquy (INTA), Dr Telma Teresinha Berchielli (UNESP) and Dr Julio Palhares (Embrapa Southeast Livestock).

Financial assistance to the ‘7st Greenhouse gases in animal agriculture conference’ by the sponsors listed alphabetically below is gratefully acknowledged: Associação Rede ILPF, Bioprocess Control AB., C-Lock Inc., DSM, Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq, New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre.

A. Berndt 0000-0002-8976-2399

A. L. Abdalla 0000-0002-5440-9974

L. G. R. Pereira 0000-0001-7166-5817

Declaration of interest

Not applicable.

Ethics statement

Not applicable.

Software and data repository resources

Not applicable.

Footnotes

a

Present address: EMBRAPA Southeast Livestock, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 234, CP339, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil.

References

Berndt, A, Pereira, LGR, Abdalla, AL 2019. Proceedings of the 7th International Greenhouse Gas and Animal Agriculture. Retrieved on 23 June 2020 from http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/206280/1/GreenhouseGasAnimal.pdfGoogle Scholar
Berndt, A and Tomkins, NW 2013. Measurement and mitigation of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical grazing systems: a perspective from Australia and Brazil. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 363372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewhurst, RJ 2013. Editorial: Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture Conference, Dublin, 2013. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 203205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckard, R 2016. Foreword: GGAA2016 Special Edition. Animal Production Science 56, iii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaughan, JB, Sejian, V, Mader, TL and Dunshea, FR 2019. Adaptation strategies: ruminants. Animal Frontiers 9, 4753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guyader, J, Tavendale, M, Martin, C and Muetzel, S 2016. Dose-response effect of nitrate on hydrogen distribution between rumen fermentation end products: an in vitro approach. Animal Production Science 56, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hristov, A and Melgar, A 2020. Short communication: Relationship of dry matter intake with enteric methane emission measured with the GreenFeed system in dairy cows receiving a diet without or with 3-nitrooxypropanol. Animal 14, s482s488.Google Scholar
IPCC 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. In Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Ku-Vera, JC, Castelán-Ortega, OA, Galindo-Maldonado, FA, Arango, J, Chirinda, N, Jiménez-Ocampo, R, Valencia-Salazar, SS, Flores-Santiago, EJ, Montoya-Flores, MD, Molina-Botero, IC, Piñeiro-Vázquez, AT, Arceo-Castillo, JI, Aguilar-Pérez, CF, Ramírez-Avilés, L, Solorio-Sánchez, FJ 2020. Review: Strategies for enteric methane mitigation in cattle fed tropical forages. Animal 14, s451s461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassen, J and Difford, GF 2020. Review: Genetic and genomic selection as a methane mitigation strategy in dairy cattle. Animal 14, s471s481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludemann, CI, Howden, SM and Eckard, RJ 2016. What is the best use of oil from cotton (Gossypium spp.) and canola (Brassica spp.) for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions: biodiesel, or as a feed for cattle? Animal Production Science 56, 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masse, J and Gerber, P 2020. Review: Climate Finance readiness of the animal protein sector. Overview of experience in linking the sector to climate finance, and options to address bottlenecks. Animal 14, s489s497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, TA, Beauchemin, KA, McGinn, SM, Hao, X and Robinson, PH 2011. Greenhouse gases in animal agriculture-Finding a balance between food production and emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, PPA, Berndt, A, Pedroso, AF, Alves, TC, Pezzopane, JRM, Sakamoto, LS, Henrique, FL, Rodrigues, PM 2020. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of pasture-based beef cattle production systems in the tropical region (Atlantic Forest biome). Animal 14, s425s435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, RS, Rodrigues, JPP, Mauricio, RM, Borges, ALCC, Berchielli, TT, Valadares Filho, SC, Machado, FS, Campos, MM, Tomich, TR, Pereira, LGR 2020. Predicting enteric methane production from cattle in the tropics. Animal 14, s436s450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samal, L, Chaudhary, LC, Agarwal, N and Kamra, DN 2016. Effects of plants containing secondary metabolites as feed additives on rumen metabolites and methanogen diversity of buffaloes. Animal Production Science 56, 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, SRO, Hannah, MC, Eckard, RJ, Wales, WJ and Moate, PJ 2020. Supplementing the diet of dairy cows with fat or tannin reduces methane yield, and additively when fed in combination. Animal 14, s462s470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Editorial: Greenhouse gases in animal agriculture: science supporting practices
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Editorial: Greenhouse gases in animal agriculture: science supporting practices
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Editorial: Greenhouse gases in animal agriculture: science supporting practices
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *