Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T18:48:40.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Candidate gene association analysis for milk yield, composition, urea nitrogen and somatic cell scores in Brown Swiss cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2014

A. Cecchinato*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
C. Ribeca
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
S. Chessa
Affiliation:
Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), via Einstein, 26900 Lodi, Italy
C. Cipolat-Gotet
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
F. Maretto
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
J. Casellas
Affiliation:
Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
G. Bittante
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate 96 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 54 candidate genes, and test the associations of the polymorphic SNPs with milk yield, composition, milk urea nitrogen (MUN) content and somatic cell score (SCS) in individual milk samples from Italian Brown Swiss cows. Milk and blood samples were collected from 1271 cows sampled once from 85 herds. Milk production, quality traits (i.e. protein, casein, fat and lactose percentages), MUN and SCS were measured for each milk sample. Genotyping was performed using a custom Illumina VeraCode GoldenGate approach. A Bayesian linear animal model that considered the effects of herd, days in milk, parity, SNP genotype and additive polygenic effect was used for the association analysis. Our results showed that 14 of the 51 polymorphic SNPs had relevant additive effects on at least one of the aforementioned traits. Polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding factor 1 (GRLF1), prolactin receptor (PRLR) and chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) were associated with milk yield; an SNP in the stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD-1) was related to fat content; SNPs in the caspase recruitment domain 15 protein (CARD15) and lipin 1 (LPIN1) affected the protein and casein contents; SNPs in growth hormone 1 (GH1), lactotransferrin (LTF) and SCD-1 were relevant for casein number; variants in beta casein (CSN2), GH1, GRLF1 and LTF affected lactose content; SNPs in beta-2 adrenergic receptor (ADRB2), serpin peptidase inhibitor (PI) and SCD-1 were associated with MUN; and SNPs in acetyl-CoA carboxylase alpha (ACACA) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A (STAT5A) were relevant in explaining the variation of SCS. Although further research is needed to validate these SNPs in other populations and breeds, the association between these markers and milk yield, composition, MUN and SCS could be exploited in gene-assisted selection programs for genetic improvement purposes.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bittante, G, Penasa, M and Cecchinato, A 2012. Invited review: genetics and modeling of milk coagulation properties. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 68436870.Google Scholar
Blott, S, Kim, JJ, Moisio, S, Schmidt-Küntzel, A, Cornet, A, Berzi, P, Cambiaso, N, Ford, C, Grisart, B, Johnson, D, Karim, L, Simon, P, Snell, R, Spelman, R, Wong, J, Vilkki, J, Georges, M, Farnir, F and Coppieters, W 2003. Molecular dissection of a quantitative trait locus: a phenylalanine-to-tyrosine substitution in the transmembrane domain of the bovine growth hormone receptor is associated with a major effect on milk yield and composition. Genetics 163, 253266.Google Scholar
Butler, WR, Calaman, JJ and Beam, SW 1996. Plasma and milk urea nitrogen in relation to pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 74, 858865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecchinato, A, Penasa, M, De Marchi, M, Gallo, L, Bittante, G and Carnier, P 2011. Genetic parameters of coagulation properties, milk yield, quality, and acidity estimated using coagulating and noncoagulating milk information in Brown Swiss and Holstein-Friesian cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 42054213.Google Scholar
Cecchinato, A, Ribeca, C, Maurmayr, A, Penasa, M, De Marchi, M, Macciotta, NPP, Mele, M, Secchiari, P, Pagnacco, G and Bittante, G 2012. Short communication: effects of β-lactoglobulin, stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase 1, and sterol regulatory element binding protein gene allelic variants on milk production, composition, acidity and coagulation properties of Brown Swiss cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 450454.Google Scholar
Cho, S, Park, TS, Yoon, DH, Cheong, HS, Namgoong, S, Park, BL, Lee, HW, Han, CS, Kim, EM, Cheong, IC, Kim, H and Shin, HD 2008. Identification of genetic polymorphisms in FABP3 and FABP4 and putative association with back fat thickness in Korean native cattle. Journal of biochemistry and molecular biology 41, 2934.Google Scholar
Cobanoglu, O, Zaitoun, I, Chang, YM, Shook, GE and Khatib, H 2006. Effects of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) gene on milk production traits in Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 44334437.Google Scholar
Falconer, DS and Mackay, TFC 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edition. Longman, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Finck, BN, Gropler, MC, Chen, Z, Leone, TC, Croce, MA, Harris, TE Jr, Lawrence, JC and Kelly, DP 2006. Lipin 1 is an inducible amplifier of the hepatic PGC-1alpha/PPARalpha regulatory pathway. Cell Metabolism 4, 199210.Google Scholar
Geweke, J 1992. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments (with discussion). In Bayesian statistics (ed. JO Berger, JM Bernardo, AP Dawid and AFM Smith), pp. 164193. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, USA.Google Scholar
Geyer, CJ 1992. Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo. Statistical Science 7, 473483.Google Scholar
Ikonen, T, Ahlfors, K, Kempe, R, Ojala, M and Ruottinen, O 1999. Genetic parameters for the milk coagulation properties and prevalence of non-coagulating milk in Finnish dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 205214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikonen, T, Morri, S, Tyrisevä, AM, Ruottinen, O and Ojala, M 2004. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between milk coagulation properties, milk production traits, somatic cell count, casein content, and pH of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 458467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khatib, H, Heifetz, E and Dekkers, JC 2005. Association of the protease inhibitor gene with production traits in Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 12081213.Google Scholar
Khatib, H, Schutzkus, V, Chang, YM and Rosa, GJM 2007. Pattern of expression of the uterine milk protein gene and its association with productive life in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 24272433.Google Scholar
Liefers, SC, Veerkamp, RF, te Pas, MFW, Delavaud, C, Chilliard, Y, Platje, M and van der Lende, T 2004. A missense mutation in the bovine leptin receptor gene is associated with leptin concentrations during late pregnancy. Animal Genetics 35, 138141.Google Scholar
Leyva-Baca, I, Schenkel, F, Sharma, BS, Jansen, GB and Karrow, NA 2007. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the bovine CCL2, IL8, CCR2 and IL8RA genes and their association with health and production in Canadian Holsteins. Animal Genetics 38, 198202.Google Scholar
Meredith, BK, Kearney, FJ, Finlay, EK, Bradley, DG, Fahey, AG, Berry, DP and Lynn, DJ 2012. Genome-wide associations for milk production and somatic cell score in Holstein-Friesian cattle in Ireland. BMC Genetics 13, 2132.Google Scholar
Miglior, F, Sewalem, A, Jamrozik, J, Lefebvre, DM and Moore, RK 2006. Analysis of milk urea nitrogen and lactose and their effect on longevity in Canadian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 48864894.Google Scholar
Miglior, F, Sewalem, A, Jamrozik, J, Bohmanova, J, Lefebvre, DM and Moore, RK 2007. Genetic analysis of milk urea nitrogen and lactose and their relationship with other production traits in Canadian Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 24682479.Google Scholar
Mitchell, RG, Rogers, GW, Dechow, CD, Vallimont, JE and Cooper, JB 2005. Milk urea nitrogen concentration: heritability and genetic correlations with reproductive performance and disease. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 44344440.Google Scholar
Pant, S, Schenkel, F, Leyva-Baca, I, Sharma, B and Karrow, N 2007. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms in bovine CARD15 and their associations with health and production traits in Canadian Holsteins. BMC Genomics 8, 421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penasa, M, Cassandro, M, Pretto, D, De Marchi, M, Comin, A, Chessa, S, Dal Zotto, R and Bittante, G 2010. Short communication: influence of composite casein genotypes on additive genetic variation of milk production traits and coagulation properties in Holstein-Friesian cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 33463349.Google Scholar
Phan, J and Reue, K 2005. Lipin, a lipodystrophy and obesity gene. Cell Metabolism 1, 7383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raftery, AE and Lewis, SM 1992. How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler?. In Bayesian statistics (ed. JM Bernardo, JO Berger, AP Dawid and AFM Smith), pp. 763774. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Ramírez, O, Quintanilla, R, Varona, L, Gallardo, D, Diaz, I, Pena, RN and Amills, M 2014. DECR1 and ME1 genotypes are associated with lipid composition traits in Duroc pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 131, 4652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, M and Rousset, F 1995. Genepop (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact test and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86, 248249.Google Scholar
Rius, AG, McGilliard, ML, Umberger, CA and Hanigan, MD 2010. Interactions of energy and predicted metabolizable protein in determining nitrogen efficiency in the lactating dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 20342043.Google Scholar
Rupp, R, Bergonier, D, Dion, S, Hygonenq, MC, Aurel, MR, Robert-Granie, C and Foucras, G 2009. Response to somatic cell count-based selection for mastitis resistance in a divergent selection experiment in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 12031219.Google Scholar
Samorè, AB, Romani, CA, Rossoni, A, Frigo, E, Pedron, O and Bagnato, A 2007. Genetic parameters for casein and urea content in the Italian Brown Swiss dairy cattle. Italian Journal of Animal Science 6 (suppl. 1), 201203.Google Scholar
Soyeurt, H, Dehareng, F, Mayeres, P, Bertozzi, C and Gengler, N 2008. Variation of delta(9)-desaturase activity in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 32113224.Google Scholar
Stoop, WM, Bovenhuis, H and Van Arendonk, JAM 2007. Genetic parameters for milk urea nitrogen in relation to milk production traits. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 19811986.Google Scholar
Sturaro, E, Marchiori, E, Cocca, G, Penasa, M, Ramanzin, M and Bittante, G 2013. Dairy systems in mountainous areas: farm animal biodiversity, milk production and destination, and land use. Livestock Science 158, 157168.Google Scholar
Waters, SM, McCabe, MS, Howard, DJ, Giblin, L, Magee, DA, MacHugh, DE and Berry, DP 2011. Associations between newly discovered polymorphisms in the Bos taurus growth hormone receptor gene and performance traits in Holstein–Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Genetics 42, 3949.Google Scholar
Wood, GM, Boettcher, PJ, Jamrozik, J, Jansen, GB and Kelton, DF 2003. Estimation of genetic parameters for concentrations of milk urea nitrogen. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 24622469.Google Scholar