Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:55:51.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can novel methods be useful for pain assessment of castrated piglets?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

C. Lonardi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Agripolis Legnaro (PD), Italy
A. Scollo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Agripolis Legnaro (PD), Italy
S. Normando
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Agripolis Legnaro (PD), Italy
M. Brscic
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Agripolis Legnaro (PD), Italy
F. Gottardo*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Agripolis Legnaro (PD), Italy
Get access

Abstract

Given that surgical castration is a painful practice performed on millions of pigs every year, a need to identify novel reliable pain assessment tools exists in order to test anaesthetic and analgesic protocols that may reduce related pain. Two treatments were considered: handling (H) and surgical castration (C). Physiological (cortisol, lactate, glycaemia, rectal and eye temperature) and behavioural variables (latency to move after treatment and alterations in posture and walking) were analysed. Cortisol showed the greatest level in C piglets within 20 min after the surgical procedure and a positive correlation with glucose concentration. Eye temperature was higher in C piglets, and the same difference was detected for rectal temperature 3 h after castration. Behavioural parameters revealed that C piglets had longer latency to move and a higher percentage of them showed alterations in posture and walking. Results of this study showed that, in castrated piglets behavioural and physiological alterations occur mainly in the first 3 h from treatment. Latency to move, alterations in posture and walking, and eye temperature appear to give additional and useful information in piglet pain assessment. However, differently from the behavioural parameters considered, eye temperature involves several manipulations of the animals and a long process to acquire the data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axiak, SM, Jaggin, N, Wenger, S, Doherr, MG and Schatzmann, U 2007. Anaesthesia for castration of piglets: comparison between intranasal and intramuscular application of Ketamine, climazolam and azaperone. Schweizerisches Archiv für Thierheilkunde und Thierheilkunde 149, 395402.Google Scholar
Carroll, JA, Berg, EL, Strauch, TA, Roberts, MP and Kattesh, HG 2006. Hormonal profiles, behavioral responses, and short-term growth performance after castration of pigs at three, six, nine, or twelve days of age. Journal of Animal Science 84, 12711278.Google Scholar
Chaloupková, H, Illmann, G, Neuhauserová, K, Tománek, M and Valis, L 2007. Preweaning housing effects on behavior and physiological measures in pigs during the suckling and fattening periods. Journal of Animal Science 85, 17411749.Google Scholar
Dockweiler, JC, Coetzee, JF, Edwards-Callaway, LN, Bello, NM, Glynn, HD, Allen, KA, Theurer, ME, Jones, ML, Miller, KA and Bergamasco, L 2013. Effect of castration method on neurohormonal and electroencephalographic stress indicators in Holstein calves of different ages. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 43404354.Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority 2004. Welfare aspects of the castration of piglets. The EFSA Journal 91, 118.Google Scholar
EU Commission 2010. European Declaration on alternatives to surgical castration of pigs. Retrieved August 26, 2013, from http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/farm/docs/castration_pigs_declaration_en.pd Google Scholar
EU Council Directive 2008/120/EC 2008. Laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (Codified version). Official Journal of the European Union L 47, 10.Google Scholar
Guatteo, R, Levionnois, O, Fournier, D, Guémené, D, Latouche, K, Leterrier, C, Mormède, P, Prunier, A, Servière, J, Terlouw, C and Le Neindre, P 2012. Minimising pain in farm animals: the 3S approach – ‘Suppress, Substitute, Soothe’. Animal 6, 12611274.Google Scholar
Hansson, M, Lundeheim, N, Nyman, G and Johansson, G 2011. Effect of local anaesthesia and/or analgesia on pain responses induced by piglet castration. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 53, 19.Google Scholar
Hay, M, Vulin, A, Genin, S, Sales, P and Prunier, A 2003. Assessment of pain induced by castration in piglets: behavioral and physiological responses over the subsequent 5 days. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82, 201218.Google Scholar
Hodgson, DS 2007. Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane for short-term anesthesia in piglets. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 34, 117124.Google Scholar
Kamao, TK, Yamaguchi, M, Kawasaki, S, Mizoue, S, Shiraishi, A and Ohashi, Y 2011. Screening for dry eye with newly developed ocular surface thermographer. American Journal of Ophthalmology 151, 782791.Google Scholar
Keita, A, Pagot, E, Prunier, A and Guidarini, C 2010. Pre-emptive meloxicam for postoperative analgesia in piglets undergoing surgical castration. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 37, 367374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluivers-Poodt, M, Zonderland, JJ, Verbraak, J, Lambooij, E and Hellebrekers, LJ 2013. Pain behaviour after castration of piglets; effect of pain relief with lidocaine and/or meloxicam. Animal 7, 11581162.Google Scholar
Kluivers-Poodt, M, Houx, BB, Robben, SRM, Koop, G, Lambooij, E and Hellebrekers, LJ 2012. Effects of a local anaesthetic and NSAID in castration of piglets, on the acute pain responses, growth and mortality. Animal 6, 14691475.Google Scholar
Lonardi, C, Brscic, M, Scollo, A and Gottardo, F 2011. A preliminary study on the assessment of pain induced by mutilation in piglets. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level, 8–11 August 2011, Guelph, Canada, 97pp.Google Scholar
Littell, RC, Henry, PR and Ammerman, CB 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 12161231.Google Scholar
Littell, RC, Milliken, GA, Stroup, WW and Wolfinger, RD 2006. SAS© System for Mixed Models, 2nd edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Marchant-Forde, JN, Lay, DC, McMunn, KA, Cheng, HW, Pajor, EA and Marchant-Forde, RM 2009. Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered separately. Journal of Animal Science 87, 14791492.Google Scholar
Mayes, PA 1995. Metabolisme du glycogene. In Précis de Biochimie de Harper (ed. Les Presses de l’Université Laval), pp. 207216. De Boeck Université, St-Foy, Canada.Google Scholar
McGlone, JJ, Nicholson, RI, Hellman, JM and Herzog, DN 1993. The development of pain in young pigs associated with castration and attempts to prevent castration-induced behavioral changes. Journal of Animal Science 71, 14411446.Google Scholar
Mellor, DJ, Cook, CJ and Stafford, KJ 2000. Quantifying some responses to pain as a stressor. In The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for welfare (ed. GP Moberg and JA Mench), pp. 173198. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Merlot, E, Mounier, AM and Prunier, A 2011. Endocrine response of gilts to various common stressor: a comparison of indicators and methods of analysis. Physiology & Behavior 102, 259265.Google Scholar
Molony, V and Kent, JE 1997. Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and physiological measurements. Journal of Animal Science 75, 266272.Google Scholar
Moya, SL, Boyle, LA, Lynch, PB and Arkins, S 2008. Effect of surgical castration on the behavioural and acute phase responses of 5-day-old piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111, 133145.Google Scholar
Mühlbauer, I, Zöls, S, Otten, W, Palzer, A, Ritzmann, M and Heinritzi, K 2010. Examination of CO2 gas anesthesia during piglet castration. Proceeding of the 21st International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, 18–21 July 2010, Vancouver, Canada, 247pp.Google Scholar
Olivier, B, Zethof, T, Pattija, T, van Boogaerta, M, van Oorschota, R, Leahyc, C, Oostinga, R, Bouwknechta, A, Veeningf, J, van der Gugtena, J and Groeninka, L 2003. Stress-induced hyperthermia and anxiety: pharmacological validation. European Journal of Pharmacology 463, 117132.Google Scholar
Prunier, A, Hay, M and Servière, J 2002. Evaluation et prévention de la douleur induite par les interventions de convenance chez le porcelet. Journées de la Recherche Porcine 34, 257268.Google Scholar
Prunier, A, Mounier, AM and Hay, M 2005. Effects of castration, tooth resection, or tail docking on plasma metabolites and stress hormones in young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 83, 216222.Google Scholar
Roth, J, Rummel, C, Barth, SW, Gerstberger, R and Hubschle, T 2009. Molecular aspects of fever and hyperthermia. Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America 29, 229245.Google Scholar
Rumsey, TS, Kahl, S and Elsasser, TH 1999. Field method for monitoring blood glucose in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 77, 21942200.Google Scholar
Sneddon, LU and Gentle, MJ 2000. Pain in farm animals, Proceedings of Workshop 5 on Sustainable Animal Production, 4–5 September 2000, Mariensee, Germany, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
Stewart, M, Stafford, KJ, Dowling, SK, Schaefer, AL and Webstera, JR 2008. Eye temperature and heart rate variability of calves disbudded with or without local anaesthetic. Physiology & Behavior 93, 789797.Google Scholar
Stewart, M, Verkerk, GA, Stafford, KJ, Schaefer, AL and Webster, JR 2010a. Non-invasive assessment of autonomic activity for evaluation of pain in calves, using surgical castration as a model. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 36023609.Google Scholar
Stewart, M, Webster, JR, Stafford, KJ, Schaefer, AL and Verkerk, GA 2010b. Technical note: Effects of an epinephrine infusion on eye temperature and heart rate variability in bull calves. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 52525257.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Davis, BL, Brooks, TA and McGlone, JJ 2010. Physiology and behavior of pigs before and after castration: effects of two topical anesthetics. Animal 4, 20712079.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Davis, BL, Brooks, TA and Coetzee, JF 2012. The physiological and behavioral response of pigs castrated with and without anesthesia or analgesia. Journal of Animal Science 90, 22112221.Google Scholar
Takakazu, O, Kae, O and Tetsuro, H 2001. Mechanisms and mediators of psychological stress-induced rise in core temperature. Psychosomatic Medicine 63, 476486.Google Scholar
Taylor, AA, Weary, DM, Lessard, M and Braithwaite, LA 2001. Behavioural responses of piglets to castration: the effect of pig age. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73, 3545.Google Scholar
von Borell, E, Baumgartner, J, Giersing, M, Jäggin, N, Prunier, A, Tuyttens, FAM and Edwards, SA 2009. Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal 3, 14881496.Google Scholar
Waldmann, KH, Rittershaus, D, Kietzmann, M and Puppe, B 2010. Evaluation of different topical anaesthetics for pain reduction during surgical castration of male piglets, Proceeding of the 21st International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, 18–21 July 2010, Vancouver, Canada, 249pp.Google Scholar
Weary, DM, Niel, L, Flower, FC and Fraser, D 2006. Identifying and preventing pain in animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100, 6476.Google Scholar
White, RG, DeShazer, JA, Tressler, CJ, Borcher, GM, Davey, S, Waninge, A, Parkhurst, AM, Milanuk, MJ and Clemens, ET 1995. Vocalization and physiological response of pigs during castration with or without a local anesthetic. Journal of Animal Science 73, 381386.Google Scholar