Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T05:49:25.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Associations of acute stress and overnight heart rate with feed efficiency in beef heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2016

J. C. Munro*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Animal Sciences, Dalhousie University, River Road, Truro, NSB2N 5E3, Canada
F. S. Schenkel
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Stone Road East, Guelph, ONN1G 2W1, Canada
P. W. Physick-Sheard
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Stone Road East, Guelph, ONN1G 2W1, Canada
A. B. P. Fontoura
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA
S. P. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Stone Road East, Guelph, ONN1G 2W1, Canada Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand
T. Tennessen
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Animal Sciences, Dalhousie University, River Road, Truro, NSB2N 5E3, Canada
Y. R. Montanholi*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Animal Sciences, Dalhousie University, River Road, Truro, NSB2N 5E3, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Proxies have the potential to accelerate feed efficiency (residual feed intake (RFI); kg dry matter/day) improvement, assisting with the reduction of beef cattle feed costs and environmental impact. Heart rate (HR) (beats per minute (BPM)) is associated with feed efficiency and influenced by autonomic activity and peripheral metabolism, suggesting HR could be used as a proxy for feed efficiency. Objectives were to assess associations between overnight HR, lying patterns and RFI, and between acute stress HR and RFI. Heifer calves (n=107; 408±28 days of age, 341±42.2 kg) and yearling heifers (n=36; 604±92 days of age, 539±52.2 kg) were exposed to a performance test to determine productive performance. Overnight HR (electrode based) and lying patterns (accelerometer based) were monitored on a subgroup of heifer calves (n=40; 20 lowest RFI; 20 highest RFI). In the 10-min acute stress assessment, all heifers were individually exposed to the opening and closing of an umbrella and HR before (HRBEF), in response to (HRMAX), after (HRAFT) and change (HRCHG; HRAFT−HRBEF) as a result of exposure were determined. Using polynomial regression, rate of HR decrease pre-exposure (β1) and rates of HR increase (β2) and decrease (β3, β4) post-exposure were determined. Heifer calves in the overnight assessment were classified into equal RFI groups (low RFI; high RFI) and HR means were treated as repeated measures and compared using multiple regression. In the acute stress assessment, heifers were classified within cattle category into equal RFI groups (low RFI; high RFI) and means and polynomial regression parameters were compared using multiple regression. Low-RFI heifer calves had a lower overnight HR (69.2 v. 72.6 BPM), similar HR change from lying to standing intervals (8.9 v. 9.2 BPM) and similar time lying (61.1% v. 64.5%) compared with high-RFI heifer calves. Low-RFI heifer calves had a higher absolute HRMAX (162.9 v. 145.7 BPM) and β2 (−0.34 v. −0.20) than high-RFI heifer calves. Low-RFI yearling heifers had similar acute stress HR means and a lower β1 (0.003 v. 0.006) than high-RFI yearling heifers. Overnight HR and acute stress HR are potential indicators of RFI in heifer calves. However, acute stress HR results varied in yearling heifers, suggesting previous handling experience and/or age influence stress response. Pending further development (predictive ability, repeatability), the acute stress assessment could have potential for on-farm application as a feed efficiency proxy in young heifers with minimal handling experience.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelhadi, LO, Santini, FJ and Gagliostro, GA 2005. Corn silage or high moisture corn supplements for beef heifers grazing temperate pastures: effects on performance, ruminal fermentation and in situ pasture digestion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 118, 6378.Google Scholar
Brito, LF, Jafarikia, M, Grossi, DA, Kijas, JW, Porto-Neto, LR, Ventura, RV, Salgorzaei, M and Schenkel, FS 2015. Characterization of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase and admixture in Australian and Canadian goats. BMC Genetics 16, 6782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian Council on Animal Care 2009. CCAC guidelines on: the care and use of farm animals in research, teaching and testing. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
Careau, V, Thomas, D, Humphries, MM and Réale, D 2008. Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos 117, 641653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Désiré, L, Veissier, I, Després, G and Boissy, A 2004. On the way to assess emotions in animals: do lambs (Ovis aries) evaluate an event through its suddenness, novelty, or unpredictability? Journal of Comparative Psychology 118, 363374.Google Scholar
Frondelius, L, Järvenranta, K, Koponen, T and Mononen, J 2015. The effects of body posture and temperament on heart rate variability in dairy cows. Physiology & Behavior 139, 437441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerber, PJ, Steinfeld, H, Mottet, A, Opio, C, Dijkman, J, Falcucci, A and Tempio, G 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Gonano, CV, Montanholi, YR, Schenkel, FS, Smith, BA, Cant, JP and Miller, SP 2014. The relationship between feed efficiency and the circadian profile of blood plasma analytes measured in beef heifers at different physiological stages. Animal 8, 16841698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T 1997. Assessment of stress during handling and transport. Journal of Animal Science 75, 249257.Google Scholar
Hafla, AN, Carstens, GE, Forbes, TDA, Tedeschi, LO, Bailey, JC, Walter, JT and Johnson, JR 2013. Relationships between postweaning residual feed intake in heifers and forage use, body composition, feeding behavior, physical activity, and heart rate of pregnant beef females. Journal of Animal Science 91, 53535365.Google Scholar
Hall, JE 2015. Guyton and Hall textbook of medical physiology, 13th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Ito, K 2009. Assessing cow comfort using lying behaviour and lameness. MSc thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Kelly, AK, McGee, M, Crews, DH, Fahey, AG, Wylie, AR and Kenny, DA 2010. Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 88, 109123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knott, SA, Cummins, LJ, Dunshea, FR and Leury, BJ 2008. Rams with poor feed efficiency are highly responsive to an exogenous adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) challenge. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 34, 261268.Google Scholar
Kolath, WH, Kerley, MS, Golden, JW and Keisler, DH 2006. The relationship between mitochondrial function and residual feed intake in Angus steers. Journal of Animal Science 84, 861865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koolhaas, JM, Korte, SM, De Boer, SF, Van Der Vegt, BJ, Van Reenen, CG, Hopster, H, De Jong, IC, Ruis, MAW and Blokhuis, HJ 1999. Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 23, 925935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancaster, PA, Carstens, GE, Michal, JJ, Brennan, KM, Johnson, KA and Davis, ME 2014. Relationships between residual feed intake and hepatic mitochondrial function in growing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 92, 31343141.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P, Kenny, DA, Earley, B, Crews, DH and McGee, M 2011. Grass silage intake, rumen and blood variables, ultrasonic and body measurements, feeding behavior, and activity in pregnant beef heifers differing in phenotypic residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 89, 32483261.Google Scholar
Montanholi, YR, Lam, S and Miller, SP 2014. Heart rate assessment in beef bulls prior to slaughter is associated with feed efficiency. Book of Abstracts of the 65th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Copenhagen, 25–29 August, Copenhagen, Denmark, 259 pp.Google Scholar
Montanholi, YR, Swanson, KC, Schenkel, FS, McBride, BW, Caldwell, TR and Miller, SP 2009. On the determination of residual feed intake and associations of infrared thermography with efficiency and ultrasound traits in beef bulls. Livestock Science 125, 2230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, EJ, Bennett, GL, Snelling, WM, Thallman, RM and Kuehn, LA 2012. Genomics and the global beef cattle industry. Animal Production Science 52, 9299.Google Scholar
Purves, D, Augustine, GJ, Fitzpatrick, D, LaMantia, AS, McNamara, JO and Williams, SM 2004. Autonomic regulation of cardiovascular function. In Neuroscience, 3rd edition (ed. D Purves, GL Augustine, D Fitzpatrick, WC Hall, AS LaMantia, JO McNamara and SM Williams), pp. 491493. Sinauer Associates Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Robért, BD, White, BJ, Renter, DG and Larson, RL 2011. Determination of lying behavior patterns in healthy beef cattle by use of wireless accelerometers. American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 467473.Google Scholar
Sandem, AI, Janczak, AM and Braastad, BO 2004. A short note on effects of exposure to a novel stimulus (umbrella) on behaviour and percentage of eye-white in cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89, 309314.Google Scholar
Schenkel, FS, Miller, SP and Wilton, JW 2004. Genetic parameters and breed differences for feed efficiency, growth, and body composition traits of young beef bulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 177185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waynert, DF, Stookey, JM, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Watts, JM and Waltz, CS 1999. The response of beef cattle to noise during handling. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62, 2742.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Munro supplementary material

Munro supplementary material 1

Download Munro supplementary material(File)
File 44.3 MB