Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-65dc7cd545-pxrsg Total loading time: 0.239 Render date: 2021-07-25T16:30:21.711Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Relationships between handling, behaviour and stress in lambs at abattoirs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2018

P. H. Hemsworth
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
M. Rice
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
S. Borg
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
L. E. Edwards
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
E. N. Ponnampalam
Affiliation:
Agriculture Victoria Research, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
G. J. Coleman
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Get access

Abstract

There is community concern about the treatment of farm animals post-farm gate, particularly animal transport and slaughter. Relationships between lamb behavioural and physiological variables on farm, stockperson, dog and lamb behavioural variables pre-slaughter and plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate in lambs post-slaughter were studied in 400 lambs. The lambs were observed in three behavioural tests, novel arena, flight distance to a human and temperament tests, before transport for slaughter. Closed-circuit television video footage was used to record stockperson, dog and lamb behaviour immediately before slaughter. Blood samples for cortisol, glucose and lactate analyses were collected on farm following the three behavioural tests and immediately post-slaughter. The regression models that best predicted plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate concentrations post-slaughter included a mixture of stockperson and dog behavioural variables as well as lamb variables both on-farm and pre-slaughter. These regression models accounted for 33%, 34% and 44% of the variance in plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate concentrations post-slaughter, respectively. Some of the stockperson and dog behaviours pre-slaughter that were predictive of the stress and metabolic variables post-slaughter included the duration of negative stockperson behaviours such as fast locomotion and lifting/pulling lambs, and the duration of dog behaviours such as lunging and barking at the lamb, while some of the predictive lamb behaviour variables included the durations of jumping and fleeing. Some of the physiological and behavioural responses to the behavioural tests on farm were also predictive of the stress and metabolic variables post-slaughter. These relationships support the well-demonstrated effect of handling on fear and stress responses in livestock, and although not direct evidence of causal relationships, highlight the potential benefits of training stockpeople to reduce fear and stress in sheep at abattoirs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Australian Meat Industry Council 2009. Industry animal welfare standards – livestock processing establishments, 2nd edition. Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA) Ltd, Crows Nest, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Beausoleil, NJ, Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ 2005. Sheep show more aversion to a dog than to a human in an arena test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91, 219232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissy, A, Fisher, AD, Bouix, J, Hinch, GN and Le Neindre, P 2005a. Genetics of fear in ruminant livestock. Livestock Production Science 93, 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissy, A, Bouix, J, Orgeur, P, Poindron, P, Bibé, B and Le Neindre, P 2005b. Genetic analysis of emotional reactivity in sheep: effects of the genotypes of the lambs and their dams. Genetic Selection Evolution 37, 387401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, GJ, Rice, M and Hemsworth, PH 2012. Human-animal relationships at sheep and cattle abattoirs. Animal Welfare 21, 1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, J and van Trijp, HCM 2013. Meeting heterogeneity in consumer demand for animal welfare: a reflection on existing knowledge and implications for the meat sector. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26, 629661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deiss, V, Temple, D, Ligout, S, Racine, C, Bouix, J, Terlouw, C and Boissy, A 2009. Can emotional reactivity predict stress responses at slaughter in sheep? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119, 193202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, DM and Warner, RD 2008. Have we underestimated the effect of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Science 80, 1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, DM, Schreurs, NM, Kenyon, PR and Jacob, RH 2014. Balancing consumer and societal requirements for sheep meat production: an Australasian perspective. Meat Science 98, 477483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, AD, Niemeyer, DO, Lea, JM, Lee, C, Paull, DR, Reed, MT and Ferguson, DM 2010. The effects of 12, 30, or 48 hours of road transport on the physiological and behavioural responses of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 88, 21442152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forkman, B, Boissy, A, Meunier-Salaün, M-C, Canali, E and Jones, RB 2007. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiology and Behavior 92, 340374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T 2007a. Introduction: effect of consumer requirements, international standards and marketing structure on the handling and transport of livestock poultry. In Livestock handling and transport (ed. T Grandin), pp. 118. CAB International, Oxon, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 2007b. Handling and welfare of livestock in slaughter plants. In Livestock handling and transport (ed. T Grandin), pp. 329354. CAB International, Oxon, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, SL, Tatum, JD, Engle, TE, Chapman, PL, Belk, KE and Smith, GC 2010. Relationships of behavioural and physiological symptoms of preslaughter stress to beef longissimus muscle tenderness. Journal of Animal Science 88, 11481159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, PH and Coleman, GJ 2011. Human–livestock interactions: the stockperson and the productivity and welfare of farmed animals, 2nd edition. CAB International, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Rice, M, Karlen, MG, Calleja, L, Barnett, JL, Nash, J and Coleman, GJ 2011. Human- animal interactions at abattoirs: relationships between handling and animal stress in sheep and cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 2433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Rice, M, Borg, S, Edwards, LE, Ponnampalam, EN and Coleman, GJ 2016. Relationship between handling, behaviour and stress in lambs at abattoirs. In Animal Production in Australia, Proceedings of 31st Biennial Conference of the Australasian Society of Animal Production, 4–7 July 2016, Glenelg, SA, Australia, p. 79. Retrieved from http://www.asap.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016-Proceedings-Booklet_web.pdf. Accessed 14th September 2018Google Scholar
Kaltas, GA and Chrousos, GP 2007. The neuroendorinology of stress. In Handbook of psychophysiology (ed. JT Cacioppo, LG Tassinary and GG Berntson), pp. 303318. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Kuchel, O 1991. Stress and catecholamines. In Stress revisited 1. Neuroendocrinolgy of stress (ed. G Jasmin and M Cantin), pp. 80103. Karger, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Moberg, GP 2000. Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In Biology of animal stress (ed. JA Mench and G Moberg), pp. 121. CAB International, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Murphy PM, Purvis IW, Lindsay DR, Le Neindre P, Orgeur P and Poindron P, 1994. Measures of temperament are highly repeatable in Merino sheep and some are related to maternal behaviour. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 20, 247–250. Google Scholar
Pallant, J 2013. SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
Ponnampalam, EN, Hopkins, DL, Bruce, H, Li, D, Baldi, G and Bekhit, AE 2017. Causes and contributing factors to ‘dark cutting’ meat: current trends and future directions: a review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 16, 400430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romeyer, A and Bouissou, MF 1992. Assessment of fear reactions in domestic sheep, and influence of breed and rearing conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34, 93119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooyackers, OE and Nair, KS 1997. Hormonal regulation of human muscle protein metabolism. Annual Reviews in Nutrition 17, 457485.10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roussel S, Hemsworth PH, Leruste H, White C, DuvauxPonter C, Nowak R and Boissy A, 2006. Repeated transport and isolation during pregnancy in ewes: effects on the reactivity to humans and to their offspring after lambing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97, 172–189. Google Scholar
Rice, M, Jongman, EC, Borg, S, Butler, KL and Hemsworth, PH 2016. Characterisation of shy-feeding and feeding lambs in the first week in a feedlot. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 179, 3945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapolsky, RM 2002. Endocrinology of the stress-response. In Behavioral Endocrinology (ed. JB Becker et al.), pp. 409–450. MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU 2000 How Do Glucocorticoids Influence Stress Responses? Integrating Permissive, Suppressive, Stimulatory, and Preparative Actions. Endocrine Reviews 21, 55–89. Google Scholar
Savage, RD and Eysenck, HJ 1964. The definition and measurement of emotionality. In Experiments in motivation (ed. HJ Eysenck), pp. 292314. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Turner, Al, Hemsworth, PH and Tilbrook, AJ 2002. The susceptibility of reproduction in female pigs to impairment by stress and the role of the hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal axis. Reproduction Fertility and Development 14, 377391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waiblinger, S, Boivin, X, Pedersen, V, Tosi, M-V, Janczak, AM, Visser, EK and Jones, RB 2006. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 185242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, RD, Greenwood, PL, Pethick, DW and Ferguson, DM 2010. Genetic and environmental effects on meat quality. Meat Science 86, 171183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Relationships between handling, behaviour and stress in lambs at abattoirs
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Relationships between handling, behaviour and stress in lambs at abattoirs
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Relationships between handling, behaviour and stress in lambs at abattoirs
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *