Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T18:21:25.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of temperature level on thermal acclimation in Large White growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

D. Renaudeau*
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Zootechniques INRA UR143, 97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
M. Kerdoncuff
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Zootechniques INRA UR143, 97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
C. Anaïs
Affiliation:
Unité de Production et Santé Animale, INRA UE503, 97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
J. L. Gourdine
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Zootechniques INRA UR143, 97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
Get access

Abstract

The effect of temperature level (24°C, 28°C, 32°C or 36°C) on performance and thermoregulatory response in growing pigs during acclimation to high ambient temperature was studied on a total of 96 Large White barrows. Pigs were exposed to 24°C for 10 days (days −10 to −1, P0) and thereafter to a constant temperature of 24°C, 28°C, 32°C or 36°C for 20 days. Pigs were housed in individual metal slatted pens, allowing a separate collection of faeces and urine and given ad libitum access to feed. Rectal (RT) and cutaneous (CT) temperatures and respiration rate (RR) were measured three times daily (0700, 1200 and 1800 h) every 2 to 3 days during the experiment. From day 1 to 20, the effect of temperature on average daily feed intake (ADFI) and BW gain (average daily gain, ADG) was curvilinear. The decrease of ADFI averaged 90 g/day per °C between 24°C and 32°C and 128 g/day per °C between 32°C and 36°C. The corresponding values for ADG were 50 and 72 g/day per °C, respectively. The 20 days exposure to the experimental temperature was divided in two sub-periods (P1 and P2, from day 1 to 10 and from day 11 to 20, respectively). ADFI was not affected by duration of high-temperature exposure (i.e. P2 v. P1). The ADG was not influenced by the duration of exposure at 24°C and 28°C groups. However, ADG was higher at P2 than at P1 and this effect was temperature dependent (+130 and +458 g/day at 32°C and 36°C, respectively). In P2 at 36°C, dry matter digestibility significantly increased (+2.1%, P < 0.01); however, there was no effect of either duration or temperature on the digestibility of dry matter at group 24°C and 32°C. RT, CT and RR were measured three times daily (0700, 1200 and 1800 h) every 2 to 3 days during the experiment. Between 28°C and 36°C, RT and CT were lower during P2 than during P1 (−0.20°C and −0.23°C; P < 0.05), whereas RR response was not affected by the duration of exposure whatever the temperature level. In conclusion, this study suggests that the effect of elevated temperatures on performance and thermoregulatory responses is dependent on the magnitude and the duration of heat stress.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bianca, W 1959. Acclimatization of calves to hot dry environment. Journal of Agricultural Science 52, 296304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA and Kachman SD 2000. Acute heat stress effects on total heat production, respiration rate, and core body temperature in growing finishing swine. In Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. The American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Brown-Brandl, TM, Eigenberg, RA, Nienaber, JA, Kachman, SD 2001. Thermoregulatory profile of a newer genetic line of pig. Livestock Production Science 71, 253260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, WH 1981. The climatic requirements of the pig. In Environmental aspects of housing for animal production (ed. JA Clark), pp. 149166. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collin, A, van Milgen, J, Dubois, S, Noblet, J 2001a. Effect of high temperature and feeding level on energy utilization in piglets. Journal of Animal Science 79, 18491857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collin, A, van Milgen, J, Dubois, S, Noblet, J 2001b. Effect of high temperature on feeding behaviour and heat production in group-housed young pig. British Journal of Nutrition 86, 6370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, SE 1983. Environmental management in animal agriculture. In Environmental management in animal agriculture (ed. The Iowa State University Press/Ames), pp. 1410. Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Giles LR 1992. Energy expenditure of growing pigs at high ambient temperatures. PhD, Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Holmes CW and Close WH 1977. The influence of climatic variables on energy metabolism and associated aspects of productivity in the pig. In Nutrition and the climatic environment (ed. W Haresign, H Swan and D Lewis), pp. 51–73. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Kamada, T, Notsuki, I 1987. Effects of environmental temperature, humidity and air movement on heat loss particularly that of latent heat, from the pig. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 58, 147154.Google Scholar
Koong, LJ, Nienaber, JA, Pekas, JC, Yen, JT 1982. Effects of plane of nutrition on organ size and fasting heat production in pigs. Journal of Nutrition 112, 16381642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bellego, L, van Milgen, J, Noblet, J 2002. Effects of high ambient temperature on protein and lipid deposition and energy utilization in growing pigs. Animal Science 75, 8596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Dividich, J, Noblet, J, Herpin, P, van Milgen, J, Quiniou, N 1998. Thermoregulation. In Progress in pig science (ed. J Wiseman, MA Varley and JP Chadwick), pp. 229263. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Littel, RC, Henry, PR, Ammerman, CB 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 12161231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massabie, P, Granier, R, Dividich, Jl 1996. Influence de la température ambiante sur les performances zootechniques du porc à l’engrais alimenté ad libitum. Journées de La Recherche Porcine En France 28, 189194.Google Scholar
Morrison, SR, Mount, LE 1971. Adaptation of growing pigs to changes in environmental temperature. Animal Production 13, 5157.Google Scholar
Mount, LE 1975. The assessment of thermal environment in relation to pig production. Livestock Production Science 2, 381392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nienaber, JA, Hahn, GL, Yen, JT 1987. Thermal environment effects of growing-finishing swine. I. Growth, feed intake and heat production. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 30, 17721775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J, Fortune, H, Shi, XS, Dubois, S 1994. Prediction of net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 344354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Bontems, V, Tran, G 2003. Estimation de la valeur énergétique des aliments chez le porc. INRA Productions Animales 16, 197210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiniou, N, Dubois, S, Noblet, J 2000. Voluntary feed intake and feeding behaviour of group-housed growing pigs are affected by ambient temperature and body weight. Livestock Production Science 63, 245253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaudeau, D 2005. Effects of short-term exposure to high ambient temperature and relative humidity on thermoregulatory responses of European (Large White) and Carribbean (Creole) restrictively fed growing pigs. Animal Research 54, 8193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaudeau, D, Leclercq-Smekens, M, Herin, M 2006. Difference in skin characteristics in European (Large White) and Caribbean (Creole) growing pigs with reference to thermoregulation. Animal Research 55, 209217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaudeau, D, Huc, E, Noblet, J 2007. Acclimation to high ambient temperature in Large White and Caribbean Creole growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 85, 779790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Milgen, J, Bernier, JF, Le Cozler, Y, Dubois, S, Noblet, J 1998. Major determinants of fasting heat production and energetic cost of activity in growing pigs of different body weight and breed/castration combination. British Journal of Nutrition 79, 509517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ, Wine, RH 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the AOAC 50, 5055.Google Scholar