Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T22:45:50.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Welfare assessment on Japanese dairy farms using the Animal Needs Index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

T Seo*
Affiliation:
Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan
K Date
Affiliation:
Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan
T Daigo
Affiliation:
Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan
F Kashiwamura
Affiliation:
Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan
S Sato
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Naruko, Miyagi, 989-6711, Japan
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: seo@obihiro.ac.jp

Abstract

The Animal Needs Index (ANI) is used for on-farm assessment of welfare in Austria. However, no synthetic welfare assessment system exists in Japan. We performed a welfare assessment of Japanese dairy farms using the ANI scoring system. On 25 farms, 36 dairy herds were assessed using the ANI35L/2000-cattle survey. On 10 dairy farms, 16 herds were housed in free-stall barns. The other 20 herds of 15 dairy farms were housed in tie-stall barns. This study was conducted between December 2004 and January 2005. The ANI scores ranged from 6.0 to 40.0 points (mean 17.8 points). The four high ranking herds on ANI value were housed in free-stalls and allowed the use of outside areas. The 13 low ranking herds were housed in tie-stalls and were not allowed the use of outside areas. The free-stall herds had significantly higher ANI scores than tie-stall herds. The ANI scores of herds having access to outside areas were significantly higher than those of herds having no outside access. This scoring system might be useful for Japanese dairy farms. However, some assessment parameters contain subjective criteria such as cleanliness, floor slipperiness, and animal health. Further studies are necessary to improve the scoring system, in particular clarifying criteria related to those parameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartussek, H 1999 A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animal's well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livestock Production Science 61: 179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartussek, H, Leeb, CH and Held, S 2000 Animal needs index for cattle. http://www.bal.bmlf.gv.at/publikationen/ignreport/ani35lc.pdfGoogle Scholar
Capdeville, J and Veissier, I 2001 A method of assessing welfare in loose housed dairy cows at farm level, focusing on animal observations. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica 30: 6268Google Scholar
Ofner, E, Amon, T, Lins, M and Amon, B 2003 Correlations between the results of animal welfare assessments by the TGI 35 L Austrian animal needs index and health and behavioural parameters of cattle. Animal Welfare 12: 571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Knierim, U and Winckler, C 2001 The development of an epidemiologically based on-farm welfare assessment system for use with dairy cows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science Supplement. 30: 73 -77Google Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003a Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and invitation of farm records. Veterinary Record 153: 197202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003b An animal-based welfare assessment of group-housed calves on UK dairy farms. Animal Welfare 12: 611617CrossRefGoogle Scholar