Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T06:29:03.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using a Delphi method to estimate the relevance of indicators for the assessment of shelter dog welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

GV Berteselli ,
S Messori ,
L Arena ,
L Smith ,
P Dalla Villa  and
F de Massis
GV Berteselli*
Affiliation:
Departiment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milano, Italy Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Abruzzo e Molise ‘G Caporale’, Campo Boario, 64100 Teramo, Italy
S Messori
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Abruzzo e Molise ‘G Caporale’, Campo Boario, 64100 Teramo, Italy
L Arena
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Abruzzo e Molise ‘G Caporale’, Campo Boario, 64100 Teramo, Italy Facoltà di Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Teramo, SP18, 64100 Teramo, Italy
L Smith
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
P Dalla Villa
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Abruzzo e Molise ‘G Caporale’, Campo Boario, 64100 Teramo, Italy
F de Massis
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Abruzzo e Molise ‘G Caporale’, Campo Boario, 64100 Teramo, Italy
*
* Contact for correspondence: g.berteselli@unimi.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The European regulatory framework lacks standardisation as regards the minimum requirements for shelter facilities, making defining welfare standards for dogs challenging. Dog (Canis familiaris) welfare assessments should consist of a comprehensive set of measurements that allow the calculation of an overall ‘welfare score.’ The Shelter Quality protocol was developed for the purpose of assessing shelter dog welfare. The study aims to establish a standardised system for evaluating shelter dog welfare by obtaining agreement from experts on the weighting of different measures contributing to an overall welfare score. The Delphi technique is a widely used method for establishing consensus among experts. Two Delphi procedures were implemented and we compared their effectiveness in achieving expert consensus by evaluating rounds’ numbers required to reach consensus and the response and attrition rates. Expert consensus was achieved in Delphi 1 when the standard deviation in the expert weightings was ≤ 5. This was achieved easily for the welfare score weightings of the four principles: ‘Good feeding’, ‘Good housing’, ‘Good Health’, and ‘Appropriate behaviour.’ Animal-based measures were found to reach consensus more quickly than resource-based measures. In Delphi 2, we used the coefficient of variation to determine consensus. No statistical differences were found between the two Delphi methods for attrition rate, response rate or number of participants. Continuing rounds until a consensus is reached is recommended as this method balances time and participant fatigue. A standardised scoring system is provided, using a single overall score of welfare that can be used to compare welfare standards between shelters.

Keywords

animal welfarecompanion animalDelphi methodologyexpert consensusshelter dogsShelter Quality protocol
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 341 - 353
Copyright
© 2022 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Arena, L, Berteselli, GV, Lombardo, F, Candeloro, L, Dalla Villa, P and De Massis, F 2019a Application of a welfare assess-ment tool (Shelter Quality Protocol) in 64 Italian long-term dogs’ shelters. Welfare hazard analysis. Animal Welfare 28: 353–363. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.3.353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, L, Wemelsfelder, F, Messori, S, Ferri, N and Barnard, S 2017 Application of Free Choice Profiling to assess the emotional state of dogs housed in shelter environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 195: 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, L, Wemelsfelder, F, Messori, S, Ferri, N and Barnard, S 2019b Development of a fixed list of descriptors for the quali-tative behavioural assessment of shelter dogs. BioRxiv: 545020. https://doi.org/10.1101/545020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, NL and Gold, RS 2001 Online research to guide knowledge management planning. Health Education and Research 16(6): 747–763. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.6.747. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.6.747CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnard, S, Pedernera, C, Candeloro, L, Ferri, N, Velarde, A and Dalla Villa, P 2016 Development of a new welfare assess-ment protocol for practical application in long-term dog shelters. The Veterinary Record 178(1): 18. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.103336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beerda, B, Schilder, MBH, Van Hooff, JARAM, De Vries, HW and Mol, JA 2000 Behavioural and hormonal indicators of enduring environmental stress in dogs. Animal Welfare 9: 49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, RM, Broom, DM, Henson, SJ, Blaney, SJP and Harper, G 2004 Assessment of the impact of government animal welfare pol-icy on farm animal welfare in the UK. Animal Welfare 13(1): 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berteselli, GV, Arena, L, Candeloro, L, Dalla Villa, P and De Massis, F 2019 Interobserver agreement and sensitivity to climatic conditions in sheltered dogs’ welfare evaluation performed with wel-fare assessment protocol (Shelter Quality protocol). Journal of Veterinary Behavior 29: 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissy, A, Manteuffel, G, Jensen, MB, Moe, RO, Spruijt, B, Keeling, LJ, Winckler, C, Forkman, B, Dimitrov, I, Langbein, J, Bakken, M, Veissier, I and Aubert, A 2007 Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiology & Behavior 92(3): 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bracke, MB and Hopster, H 2006 Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19(1): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-4493-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracke, MB, Spruijt, BM and Metz, JH 1999 Overall animal welfare reviewed. Part 3: Welfare assessment based on needs and supported by expert opinion. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 47(3): 307–322. https://doi.org/10.18174/njas.v47i3.468Google Scholar
Braun, G 2011 Taking a shelter dog for walks as an important step in the resocialization process. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 6(1): 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 2001 Coping, stress and welfare. In: Broom, DM (ed) Coping with Challenge: Welfare in Animals including Humans pp 1–9. Dahlem University Press: Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 2011 A history of animal welfare science. Acta Biotheoretica 59: 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9123-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckland, EL, Corr, SA, Abeyesinghe, SM and Wathes, CM 2014 Prioritisation of companion dog welfare issues using expert consensus. Animal Welfare 23: 39–49. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.1.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, G, Holden, E, Reid, J, Scott, EM, Firth, A, Bell, A, Robertson, S and Nolan, AM 2014 Development of a behaviour-based measurement tool with defined intervention level for assessing acute pain in cats. Journal of Small Animal Practice 55(12): 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capdeville, J and Veissier, I 2001 A method of assessing welfare in loose housed dairy cows at farm level, focusing on animal obser-vations. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A-Animal Science 51(S30): 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647001316923081Google Scholar
Cockram, MS and Hughes, BO 2011 Health and disease. In: Appleby MC, Hughes BO, Mench JA and Olsson AI (eds) Animals Welfare, Second Edition pp 120–137. CABI: Wallingford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936594.0120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colditz, IG and Hine, BC 2016 Resilience in farm animals: biol-ogy, management, breeding and implications for animal welfare. Animal Production Science 56(12): 1961–1983. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppola, CL, Grandin, T and Enns, RM 2006 Human interaction and cortisol: can human contact reduce stress for shelter dogs? Physiology & Behavior 87(3): 537–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.12.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalla Villa, P, Barnard, S, Di Fede, E, Podaliri, M, Candeloro, L, Di Nardo, A, Siracura, C and Serpell, JA 2013 Behavioural and physiological responses of shelter dogs to long-term confine-ment. Veterinaria Italiana 49(2): 231–241Google Scholar
Dawkins, MS 2004 Using behaviour to assess animal welfare. Animal Welfare 13(1): 3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denham, HDC, Bradshaw, JWS and Rooney, NJ 2014 Repetitive behaviour in kenneled domestic dog: stereotypical or not? Physiology & Behavior 128: 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, IR, Grant, RC, Feldman, BM, Pencharz, PB, Ling, SC, Moore, AM and Wales, PW 2014 Defining consensus: a sys-tematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67(4): 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesel, G, Brodbelt, D and Pfeiffer, DU 2010 Characteristics of relinquished dogs and their owners at 14 rehoming centers in the United Kingdom. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 13(1): 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700903369255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donohoe, HM and Needham, RD 2009 Moving best practice forward: Delphi characteristics, advantages, potential problems, and solutions. International Journal of Tourism Research 11(5): 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare 2012 Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal 10(6): 2767–2795. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2767Google Scholar
Eisele, PH 2001 A practical dog bed for environmental enrichment for geriatric beagles with applications for puppies and other small dogs. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 40: 36–38Google ScholarPubMed
English, JM and Kernan, GL 1976 The prediction of air travel and aircraft technology to the year 2000 using the Delphi method Transportation Research 10(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(76)90094-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C 1997 The use of consensus methods and expert panels in pharmacoeconomic studies. Pharmacoeconomics 12: 121–122. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199712020-00003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1992 FAWC updates the Five Freedoms. Veterinary Record 131: 357Google Scholar
Fraser, D, Duncan, IJ, Edwards, SA, Grandin, T, Gregory, NG, Guyonnet, V, Hemsworth, PH, Huertas, SM, Huzzey, JM, Mellor, DJ, Mench, JA, Spinka, M and Whay, HR 2013 General principles for the welfare of animals in production systems: the underlying science and its application. The Veterinary Journal 198(1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.06.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glickman, LT, Glickman, NW, Schellenberg, DB, Simpson, K and Lantz, GC 1997 Multiple risk factors for the gastric dilatation-volvulus syndrome in dogs: a practitioner/owner case-control study. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 33(3): 197–204. https://doi.org/10.5326/15473317-33-3-197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greatorex, J and Dexter, T 2000 An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(4): 1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01569.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grigg, EK, Nibblett, BM, Robinson, JQ and Smits, JE 2017 Evaluating pair versus solitary housing in kennelled domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) using behaviour and hair cortisol: a pilot study. Veterinary Record Open 4(1): e000193. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2016-000193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, B and Tomasello, M 2005 Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 405–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasson, F, Keeney, S and McKenna, H 2000 Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32: 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennessy, MB 2013 Using hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal mea-sures for assessing and reducing the stress of dogs in shelters: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 149(1-4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessy, MB, Voith, VL, Mazzei, SJ, Buttram, J, Miller, DD and Linden, F 2001 Behavior and cortisol levels of dogs in a public ani-mal shelter, and an exploration of the ability of these measures to predict problem behavior after adoption. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73: 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00139-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiby, EF, Rooney, NJ and Bradshaw, JWS 2006 Behavioural and physiological responses of dogs entering re-homing kennels. Physiology & Behavior 89: 385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00139-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, CC and Sandford, BA 2007 The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 12: 1–8Google Scholar
Hubrecht, RC, Serpell, JA and Poole, TB 1992 Correlates of pen size and housing condition on behaviour of kennelled dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80096-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jairath, N and Weinstein, J 1994 The Delphi methodology (Part one): A useful administrative approach. Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration 7(3): 29–42Google Scholar
Keeney, S, Hasson, F and McKenna, H 2006 Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53(2): 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03716.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerlinger, FN 1973 Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart, Winston, Inc: New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
Kiddie, JL and Collins, LM 2014 Development and validation of a quality of life assessment tool for use in kennelled dogs (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 158: 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koolhaas, JM, Bartolomucci, A, Buwalda, B, de Boer, SF, Flügge, G, Korte, SM, Meerlo, P, Murison, R, Olivier, B, Palanza, P, Richter-Levin, G, Sgoifo, A, Steimer, T, Stiedl, O, van Dijk, G, Wöhr, M and Fuchs, E 2011 Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 35(5): 1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koolhaas, JM, Coppens, CM, de Boer, SF, Buwalda, B, Meerlo, P and Timmermans, PJ 2013 The resident-intruder paradigm: a standardized test for aggression, violence and social stress. Journal of Visualized Experiments 77: e4367. https://doi.org/10.3791/4367Google Scholar
Koolhaas, JM, Korte, SM, De Boer, SF, Van Der Vegt, BJ, Van Reenen, CG, Hopster, H, De Jong, IC, Ruis, MAW and Blokhuis, HJ 1999 Coping styles in animals: current status in behav-ior and stress-physiology. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 23: 925–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lascelles, BD and Robertson, SA 2010 DJD-associated pain in cats: what can we do to promote patient comfort? Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 12: 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2010.01.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linstone, HA and Turoff, M 1975 Introduction. In: Linstone, HA and Turoff, M (eds) The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications pp 3–12. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company: Reading, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
Luescher, A and Medlock, R 2009 The effects of training and environmental alterations on adoption success of shelter dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 117: 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariti, C, Gazzano, A, Moore, JL, Baragli, P, Chelli, L and Sighieri, C 2012 Perception of dogs’ stress by their owners. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 7(4): 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall-Pescini, S and Kaminski, J 2014 The social dog: histo-ry and evolution. In: Kaminski, J and Marshall-Pescini, S (eds) The Social Dog: Behavior and Cognition pp 3–33. Academic Press: London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407818-5.00001-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G and Rushen, J 2008 Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ and Latham, NR 2004 Can't stop, won't stop: Is stereotypy a reliable animal. Animal Welfare 13: S57–S69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGreevy, PD, Starling, M, Branson, NJ, Cobb, ML and Calnon, D 2012 An overview of the dog-human dyad and ethograms within it. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 7(2): 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meintjes, R 2012 An overview of the physiology of pain for the veterinarian. The Veterinary Journal 193: 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, D, Cook, C and Stafford, K 2000 Quantifying some responses to pain as a stressor. In: Moberg, GP and Mench, JA (eds) The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Welfare pp 171–198. CAB International: Wallingford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993591.0171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menor-Campos, DJ, Molleda-Carbonell, JM and López-Rodríguez, R 2011 Effects of exercise and human contact on ani-mal welfare in a dog shelter. Veterinary Record 169(15). https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.d4757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merola, I and Mills, DS 2016a Behavioural signs of pain cats: an expert consensus. PLoS ONE 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0150040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merola, I and Mills, DS 2016b Systematic review of the behavioural assessment of pain in cats. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 18(2): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X15578725CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertens, PA and Unshelm, J 1996 Effects of group and individual housing on the behavior of kennelled dogs in animal shelters. Anthrozoö s 9(1): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279396787001662Google Scholar
Miele, M, Veissier, I, Evans, A and Botreau, R 2011 Animal wel-fare: establishing a dialogue between science and society. Animal Welfare 20(1): 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millan, MJ 1999 The induction of pain: an integrative review. Progress in Neurobiology 57: 1–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(98)00048-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, L and Zawistowski, S 2015 Housing, husbandry and behavior of dogs in animal shelters. In: Weiss, E, Mohan-Gibbons, H and Zawistowsky, S (eds) Animal Behavior for Shelter Veterinarians and Staff pp 145–159. John Wiley & Sons: London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119421313.ch7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, DS, Demontigny-Bédard, I, Gruen, M, Klinck, MP, McPeake, KJ, Barcelos, AM, Hewison, L, Van Haevermaet, H, Denenberg, S, Hauser, H, Koch, C, Ballantyne, K, Wilson, C, Mathkari, CV, Pounder, J, Garcia, E, Darder, P, Fatjó, J and Levine, E 2020 Pain and problem behavior in cats and dogs. Animals 10(2): 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moberg, GP 2000 Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In: Moberg, GP and Mench, JA (eds) The Biology of Animal Stress pp 123–146. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993591.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, KN and Tromborg, CT 2007 Sources of stress in cap-tivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102(3-4): 262–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, PM 2003 Delphi: myths and reality. Journal of Health Organisation and Management 17(1): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260310469319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardoia, M, Arena, L, Berteselli, G, Migliaccio, P, Valerii, L, Di Giustino, L and Dalla Villa, P 2019 Development of a question-naire to evaluate the occupational stress in dog's shelter opera-tors. Veterinaria Italiana 55(1): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.1476.7954.2Google Scholar
Newbury, S, Blinn, MK, Bushby, PA, Cox, CB, Dinnage, JD, Griffin, B, Hurley, KF, Isaza, N, Jones, W, Miller, L, O’Quin, J, Patronek, GJ, Smith-Blackmore, M and Spindel, M 2010 Guidelines for standards of care in animal shelters. The Association of Shelter Veterinarians: Corning, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
Normando, S, Contiero, B, Marchesini, G and Ricci, R 2014 Effects of space allowance on the behaviour or long-term housed shelter dogs. Behavioural Processes 103: 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Normando, S, Corain, L, Salvadoretti, M, Meers, L and Valsecchi, P 2009 Effects of an enhanced human interaction pro-gram on shelter dogs’ behaviour analysed using a novel nonpara-metric test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116: 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notari, L 2009 Stress in veterinary behavioural medicine. In: Horwitz, D and Mills, D (eds) BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Behavioural Medicine, Second Edition pp 136–145. British Small Animal Veterinary Association: Gloucester, UK. https://doi.org/10.22233/9781905319879.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, KL 2003 Medical differentials with potential behavioral manifestations. Veterinary Clinical Small Animals 33: 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(02)00103-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Part, CE, Kiddie, JL, Hayes, WA, Mills, DS, Neville, RF, Morton, DB and Collins, LM 2014 Physiological, physical and behavioural changes in dogs (Canis familiaris) when kennelled: testing the valid-ity of stress parameters. Physiology & Behavior 133: 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pati, S, Panda, SK, Acharya, AP, Senapati, S, Behera, M and Behera, SS 2015 Evaluation of geriatric changes in dogs. Veterinary World 8(3): 273–278. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.273-278CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, ES, Harding, EJ and Mendl, M 2005 Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 29: 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, E, Bennett, PC and McGreevy, PD 2015 Current per-spectives on attachment and bonding in the dog-human dyad. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 8: 71. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S74972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petak, I 2013 Communication patterns within a group of shelter dogs and implications for their welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 16(2): 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2013.741001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomerantz, O, Paukner, A and Terkel, J 2012 Some stereotypic behaviors in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) are correlated with both perseveration and the ability to cope with acute stres-sors. Behavioural Brain Research 230(1): 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.02.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, C 2003 The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41(4): 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Protopopova, A 2016 Effects of sheltering on physiology, immune function, behavior, and the welfare of dogs. Physiology & Behavior 159: 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Protopopova, A, Hauser, H, Goldman, KJ and Wynne, CD 2018 The effects of exercise and calm interactions on in-kennel behavior of shelter dogs. Behavioural Processes 146: 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.11.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, DP, Nair, PC and Balasubramanian, R 2003 Analytical search of problems and prospects of power sector through Delphi study: case study of Kerala State, India. Energy Policy 31(12): 1245–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00185-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, H-Y, Paterson, MBA, Georgiou, F and Phillips, CJC 2021 Do canine behavioural assessments and characteristics pre-dict the human-dog interaction when walking on a leash in a shel-ter setting? Animals 11(1): 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, ER 2005 Returning a recently adopted companion animal: adopters’ reasons for and reactions to the failed adoption experi-ence. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 8(3): 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0803_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, KD and Mills, DS 2007 The effect of the kennel environ-ment on canine welfare: a critical review of experimental studies. Animal Welfare 16(4): 435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Te Velde, H, Aarts, N and Van Woerkum, C 2002 Dealing with ambivalence: farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal wel-fare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15(2): 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015012403331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topál, J, Miklósi, Á, Gácsi, M, Dóka, A, Pongrácz, P, Kubinyi, E, Virányi, Z and Csányi, V 2009 The dog as a model for under-standing human social behavior. Advances in the Study of Behavior 39: 71–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(09)39003-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhonacker, F, Verbeke, W, Van Poucke, E and Tuyttens, FA 2008 Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livestock Science 116(1): 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, AM and Selfe, J 1996 The Delphi method: a useful tool for the allied health researcher. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 3(12): 677–681. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjtr.1996.3.12.14731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, K 2016 Chronic pain management in dogs and cats. In Practice 38(4): 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.i1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, AJF, Main, DCJ and Whay, HR 2004 Welfare assess-ment: indices from clinical observation. Animal Welfare 13(1): 93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weipkema, PR and Schouten, WPG 1990 Mechanisms of coping in social situations. In: Zayan, R and Dantzer, R (eds) Social Stress in Domestic Animals pp 8–24. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Welfare Quality® 2009 Welfare Quality assessment protocol for pigs (sows and piglets, growing and finishing pigs). Welfare Quality® Consortium: Leystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Wells, D, Graham, L and Hepper, PG 2002 The influence of length of time in a rescue shelter on the behaviour of kennelled dogs. Animal Welfare 11: 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752756200007201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F, Hunter, TEA, Mendl, MT and Lawrence, AB 2001 Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free choice profiling approach. Animal Behaviour 62: 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003b Animal-based measures for the assessment of welfare state of dairy cattle, pigs and laying hens: consensus of expert opinion. Animal Welfare 12(2): 205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Webster, AJF and Green, LE 2003a Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based mea-surements: Direct observations and investigation of farm records. Veterinary Records 153: 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.153.7.197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, PL and Webb, C 1994 Delphi Technique: a method-ological discussion. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19(1): 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01066.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousuf, MI 2007 Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 12(4): 1–8Google Scholar
Zilcha-Mano, S, Mikulincer, M and Shaver, PR 2011 An attachment perspective on human-pet relationships: conceptu-alisation and assessment of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality 45: 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zupan, M, Buskas, J, Altimiras, J and Keeling, LJ 2016 Assessing positive emotional states in dogs using heart rate and heart rate variability. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 155: 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.11.027Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Berteselli et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 293 KB