Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:12:32.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rank correlated use of soft flooring by dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S Platz ,
F Ahrens ,
J Bendel ,
H Meyer  and
MH Erhard
S Platz*
Affiliation:
Chair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Animal Housing, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
F Ahrens
Affiliation:
Chair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Animal Housing, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
J Bendel
Affiliation:
Chair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Animal Housing, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
H Meyer
Affiliation:
Chair of Physiology, Life and Food Science Centre, Technical University, Munich, Freising- Weihenstephan
MH Erhard
Affiliation:
Chair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Animal Housing, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: siegfried.platz@tierhyg.vetmed.uni-muenchen.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study covers rank correlated use of soft flooring during partial replacement (45% of the total floor space) of concrete slatted floor by rubber covering. For this purpose, the rank position of 19 cows within a 50 Brown Swiss dairy cattle herd was evaluated by calculating the individual dominance index. A clear rank affiliation could be found for 16 cows (eight cows with a rank index 0.67 – 1.0 (ie high ranking) and eight cows with a rank index 0.0 – 0.25 (ie low ranking). Using focal sampling, the 16 cows were observed with time-lapse video recording before and after floor replacement (8.5 hours per day for 10 days with each floor kind). After replacing 45% of the concrete floor surface with soft flooring in a test area far from the milking parlour, high ranking cows used this area significantly longer ie 105.5 ± 36.2 min more than before compared with lower ranking herd members, who did so 17.6 ± 24.6 min less. Before replacement, low ranking cows spent significantly more time on the concrete slatted floor of the test area (147.6 ± 13.2 min) than high ranking cows (80.9 ± 17.3 min). The results of the observation demonstrate that the extent of use of soft rubber flooring correlates to rank-order and illustrates the importance of barn designs in terms of meeting their specific needs in spite of an existing rank order.

Keywords

animal welfareconcrete floorcow comfortdairy cattlesocial ranksoft flooring
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , May 2007 , pp. 255 - 257
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, RM 1996 Peoples willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare 5: 3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, B and Wandel, H 2004 Soft-elastic floorings for paved walking areas in cubicle housing systems for dairy cattle. In: Zemljic B (ed) 13th International Symposium and 5th Conference on Lameness in Ruminants pp 212-213. Maribor, SloveniaGoogle Scholar
Benz, B 2002 Elastische Beläge für Betonspaltenböden in Liegeboxenlaufställen. Forschungsbericht Agrartechnik des Arbeitskreises Forschung und Lehre der Max-Eyth-Gesellschaft Agartechnik im VDI (VDI-MEG) 394. [Title translation: Elastic coverings for concrete slatted floors in loose barns]Google Scholar
Broom, MD 1991 Animal welfare. Concepts and measurements. Journal of Animal Science 69: 4167–4175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, NB, Nordlund, KV and Oetzel, GR 2004 Environmental influences on claw horn lesions associated with laminitis and subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87: E36–E46Google Scholar
Galindo, F, Broom, DM and Jackson, PGG 2000 A note on possible link between behaviour and the occurrence of lameness in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67: 335–341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultgren, J 2001 Effects of two stall flooring systems on the behaviour of tied dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73: 167–177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultgren, J and Bergsten, C 2001 Effects of a rubber-slatted flooring system on cleanliness and foot health in tied dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 52: 75–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, DE, Steen, RWJ and Beattie, V 2001 Preference of housed finishing beef cattle for different floor types. Animal Welfare 10: 395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sambraus, HH 1975 Beobachtungen und Überlegungen zur Sozialordnung von Rindern. Züchtungskunde 47: 8–14. [Title translation: Thoughts and observations concerning social ranking in cattle]Google Scholar
Somers, JGCJ, Frankena, K, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN and Metz, JHM 2003 Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 2082–2093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Telezhenko, E and Bergsten, C 2005 Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol van der, PPJ, Metz, JHM, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Back, W, Braam, CR and Weijs, WA 2003 The vertical ground reaction force and the pressure distribution on the claws of dairy cows while walking on a flat substrate. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 2875–2883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner-Storch, AM, Palmer, RW and Kammel, DW 2003 Factors affecting stall use for different free stall bases. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 2253–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar