Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:03:50.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introducing Dogs Into Kennels: Prediction of Social Tendencies to Facilitate Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S M Sonderegger
Affiliation:
Pet Ethology Group, Ethology Department, Institute of Zoology, University of Zurich-Irchel, Switzerland
D C Turner*
Affiliation:
Institute for applied Ethology and Animal Psychology, IET/IEAP, CH-8816 Hirzel, Switzerland
*
Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints

Abstract

Ethological observations of the introduction of new charges into a large mixed-sex group in a dog shelter, and the later behaviour of the dogs in the run, were used to investigate a method of early assessment of the dogs’ reactions to the new situation. Subjects were divided qualitatively into four categories according to their interactional behaviour during the first two days (‘dog-oriented’, ‘human-oriented’, ‘dog & human friendly’, ‘asocial’). This classification was compared to an independent division resulting from statistical analysis of the dogs ‘ entry-sequences, and was found to be consistent for 80 per cent of dogs. One week after entry, both female and male dogs received distinctively fewer social interactions by conspecifics and tended to direct more interaction-initiating behaviour towards the keeper, thus demonstrating an integration process; females became more physically active and initiated significantly more interactions with other dogs; for males, the contrary was found. Qualitative comparison between first visitors and regular guests suggest that experienced dogs integrate faster, showing fewer behavioural signs of distress and engaging more often in investigatory behaviour. Results indicate that the assessment of dogs from their behaviour during the entry-sequence is a valid method to predict later tendencies. Males and females should be handled differently during introduction. The stress of entry into an existing group can therefore be reduced, improving the animals’ welfare.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1996 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, J 1974 Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49(3-4): 227267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, W E 1975 Behavior Problems in Dogs. American Veterinary Publications Inc: Santa Barbara, USAGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, M W 1978 The Dog: Its Domestication and Behavior. Garland STPM Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Immelmann, K 1983 Einführung in die Verhaltensforschung, Verlag Paul Parey: Berlin/Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Manly, B 1986 Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer. Chapman & Hall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Mcch, L D 1970 The Wolf: The Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species. Natural History Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Mertens, P 1994 Die Haltung von Hunden in Tierheimen: Verhaltens- und tierschutz-relevante Aspekte der Einzel- und Gruppenhaltung. Shaker: Aachen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Scott, J and Fuller, J 1965 Dog Behavior - The Genetic Basis. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
van den Borg, J, Netto, W J and Planta, D J 1991 Behavioural testing of dogs in animal shelters to predict problem behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 237251Google Scholar
Zimen, E 1989 Der Hund: Abstammung - Verhalten - Mensch und Hund. C. Bertelsmann Verlag GmbH: München, GermanyGoogle Scholar