Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:13:54.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of genetic selection for increased milk yield on the welfare of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

PA Oltenacu  and
DM Broom
PA Oltenacu*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74074, USA
DM Broom
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Welfare and Anthrozoology, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: toni.oltenacu@okstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Milk yield per cow has more than doubled in the previous 40 years and many cows now produce more than 20,000 kg of milk per lactation. The increase in production should be viewed with concern because: i) the increase in milk yield has been accompanied by declining fertility, increasing leg and metabolic problems and declining longevity; ii) there are unfavourable genetic correlations between milk yield and fertility, mastitis and other production diseases, indicating that deterioration in fertility and health is largely a consequence of selection for increased milk yield; and iii) high disease incidence, reduced fertility, decreased longevity and modification of normal behaviour are indicative of substantial decline in cow welfare. Improving welfare is important as good welfare is regarded by the public as indicative of sustainable systems and good product quality and may also be economically beneficial. Expansion of the Profitable Lifetime Index used in the UK to include mastitis resistance and fertility could increase economic response to selection by up to 80%, compared with selection for milk production alone. In the last 10 years, several breeding organisations in Europe and North America followed the example of Nordic Countries and have included improving fertility and reducing incidence of mastitis in their breeding objectives, but these efforts are still timid. A multi-trait selection programme in which improving health, fertility and other welfare traits are included in the breeding objective, and appropriately weighted relative to production traits, should be adopted by all breeding organisations motivated in their goal of improving welfare.

Keywords

animal welfaredairy cattlefertilitymastitismilk yieldselection
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue S1: Proceedings of the UFAW International Symposium ‘Darwinian selection, selective breeding and the welfare of animals’ Bristol, 2009 , May 2010 , pp. 39 - 49
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamec, V, Cassell, BG, Smith, EP and Pearson, RE 2006 Effects of inbreeding in the dam on dystocia and stillbirths in US Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 307–314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agenäs, S, Heath, MF, Nixon, RM, Wilkinson, JM and Phillips, CJC 2006 Indicators of under nutrition in cattle. Animal Welfare 15: 149–160Google Scholar
Barkema, HW, Westrik, JD, van Keulen, KAS, Schukken, YH and Brand, A 1994 The effects of lameness on reproductive performance, milk production and culling in Dutch herds. Preventitive Veterinary Medicine 20: 149–259Google Scholar
Beam, SW and Butler, WR 1999 Effects of energy balance on follicular development and first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54S: 411–424Google Scholar
Beilharz, RG, Luxford, BG and Wilkinson, JL 1993 Quantitative genetics and evolution: Is our understanding of genetics sufficient to explain evolution? Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 110: 161–170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, MJ and Roberts, DJ 2007 The impact of uterine infection on a dairy cow's performance. Theriogenology 68: 1074–1079CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boettcher, PJ, Dekkers, JC, Warnick, LD and Wells, SJ 1998 Genetic analysis of clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1148–1156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, DM 1994 The effects of production efficiency on animal welfare. In: Huisman, EA, Osse, JWM, van der Heide, D, Tamminga, S, Tolkamp, BL, Schouten, WGP, Hollingsworth, CE and van Winkel, GL (eds) Biological Basis of Sustainable Animal Production. Proceedings of the 4th Zodiac Symposium EAAP Publication 67. Wageningen Pers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1995 Measuring the effects of management methods, systems, high production efficiency and biotechnology on farm animal welfare. In: Mepham, TB, Tucker, GA and Wiseman, J (eds) Issues in Agricultural Bioethics pp 319–334. Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1997 Animal behaviour as an indicator of animal welfare in different housing and management systems. In: Saloniemi, H (ed) Proceeding of the 9th International Congress in Animal Hygiene pp 371–378. Tummavnoren Kirjapaino Oy: Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 2001a Effects of dairy cattle breeding and production methods on animal welfare. Proceedings of the 21st World Buiatrics Congress pp 1–7. Punta del Este, UruguayGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 2001b Coping with Challenge: Welfare in Animals: Including Humans. Dahlem University Press: Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 2004 Future food animal production efficiency and acceptability. In: Shamsuddin, ZH (ed) Agriculture Congress: Innovation Towards Modernized Agriculture pp 17–21. Universiti Putra Malaysia: Serdang, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 2006 Adaptation. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 119: 1–6Google ScholarPubMed
Broom, DM and Johnson, KG 2000 Stress and Animal Welfare. Kluwer/Springer: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Brotherstone, S and Goddard, M 2005 Artificial selection and maintenance of genetic variance in the global dairy cow population. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences 360: 1479–1488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castillo-Juarez, H, Oltenacu, PA, Blake, RW, McCulloch, CE and Cienfuegos-Rivas, EG 2000 Effect of herd environment on the genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk yield, conception rate, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 807–814CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, LG 1998 Possibilities for genetic improvement of disease resistance, functional traits and animal welfare. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science. 29: 77–89Google Scholar
Christiansen, SB and Sand⊘e, P 2000 Bioethics: limits to the interference with life. Animal Reproduction Science 60–61: 15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, MJ, Downham, DY, Faull, WB, Hughes, JW, Manson, FJ, Merritt, JB, Murray, RD, Russell, WB, Sutherst, JE and Ward, WR 1996 Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Records 138: 563–567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colleau, JJ and Le Bihan-Duval, E 1995 A simulation study of selection methods to improve mastitis resistance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 659–671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, H, Smith, R, Royal, M, Knight, C and Sheldon, I 2007 The high-producing dairy cow and its reproductive performance. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42(2): 17–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dransfield, MB, Nebel, RL, Pearson, RE and Warnick, LD 1998 Timing of insemination for dairy cows identified in oestrus by a radiotelemetric oestrus detection system. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1874–1882Google ScholarPubMed
Emanuelson, U, Danell, B and Philipsson, J 1988 Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell counts, and milk production estimated by multiple-trait restricted maximum likelihood. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 467–476CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emanuelson, U and Oltenacu, PA 1998 Incidences and effects of diseases on the performance of Swedish dairy herds stratified by production. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2376–2382CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ensminger, ME and Parry, RC 1996 Beef Cattle Science. The Interstate Printers and Publishers: Illinois, USAGoogle Scholar
Espejo, LA, Endres, MI and Salfer, JA 2006 Prevalence of lameness in high-producing holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 3052–3058CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essl, A 1998 Longevity in dairy cattle breeding, a review. Livestock Production Science 57: 79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAWC (Farm Animal Welfare Council) 1997 Report on the Welfare of Dairy Cattle. http://www.fawc.co.uk/repors/dairycow/dcowrtoc.htmGoogle Scholar
Goddard, ME and Beilharz, RG 1977 Natural selection and animal breeding. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress SABRAO pp 4.19-4.21. February 1997, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Greenough, PR and Weaver, AD 1997 Lameness in Cattle, 3rd Edition. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Guard, C 1999 Control programmes for digital dermatitis. The Tools for Success in the new Millenium: Volume II, Advances in Dairy Technology pp 235–242. University of Alberta, Edmonton, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Hansen, LB 2000 Consequences of selection for milk yield from a geneticist's viewpoint. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1145–1150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, BL and Winkelman, AM 2000 Influence of North American Holstein genetics on dairy cattle performance in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Large Herds Conference 6: 122–136Google Scholar
Hazel, LN 1943 The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28: 476–490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heringstad, B, Klemetsdal, G and Ruane, J 2000 Selection for mastitis in dairy cattle: a review with focus on the situation of the Nordic countries. Livestock Production Science 64: 95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingvartsen, KL, Dewhurst, RJ and Friggens, NC 2003 On the relationship between lactational performance and health: is it yield or metabolic imbalance that causes diseases in dairy cattle? A position paper. Livestock Production Science 83: 277–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadarmideen, HN, Thompson, R and Simm, G 2000 Linear and threshold genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 71: 411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, JF, Schutz, MM and Boettcher, PJ 2004 Genotype x environment interaction for grazing vs confinement II. Health and reproduction traits. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 510–516CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knaus, W 2009 Dairy cows trapped between performance demands and adaptability. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 89: 1107–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindhe, B and Philipsson, J 1999 The Scandinavian experience of including reproductive traits in breeding programmes. In: Diskin MG (ed) Fertility in the High-Producing Dairy Cow. Occasional Pub 26: 251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, H, Satter, LD and Wiltbank, MC 2004 Relationship between level of milk production and oestrous behaviour of lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 81: 209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, MC 2001 Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science 84: 1277–1293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M and Walsh, B 1998 Genetic Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
McGlone, J 2001 Farm animal welfare in the context of other societal issues: toward sustainable systems. Livestock Production Science 72: 75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomerie, WA 2004 Future genetic progress of dairy cattle in New Zealand. New Zealand Society of Animal Production 64: 96–100Google Scholar
Mrode, RA and Swanson, GJT 1996 Genetic and statistical properties of somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect means of reducing the incidence of mastitis in dairy cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 64: 847–857Google Scholar
Nielsen, B 1998 Interspecific comparison of lactational stress: is the welfare of dairy cows compromised? In: Veissier, I and Boissy, A (eds) Proceedings of the 32nd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology. INRA: Clermont Ferrand, FranceGoogle Scholar
NRS (The Royal Dutch Cattle Syndicate) 2007 NRS Statistics Handbook. NRS: Arnhem, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
OECD 1999 OECD Agricultural Outlook, 1999-2004. OECD: Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
Oltenacu, PA and Algers, B 2005 Selection for increased production and the welfare of dairy cows; are new breeding goals needed? Ambio 34: 308–312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osteras, O, Solbu, H, Refsdal, AO, Roalkvam, T, Filseth, O, and Minsaas, A, 2007 Results and evaluation of thirty years of health recordings in the Norwegian dairy cattle population. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 4483–4497CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, J, Sander-Nielsen, U and Aamand, GP 2002 Economic values in the Danish total merit index. Interbull, Bulletin 29: 150–154Google Scholar
Philipot, JM, Pluvinage, P, Cimarosti, I, Sulpice, P and Bugnard, F 1994 Risk factors of dairy cow lameness associated with housing conditions. Veterinary Research 25: 244–248Google ScholarPubMed
Philipsson, J and Lindhe, B 2003 Experiences of including reproduction and health traits in Scandinavian dairy cattle breeding programmes. Livestock Production Science 83: 99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, MJ and Broom, DM 1987 The behaviour and welfare of cows in relation to cubicle house design. In: Wierenga, HK and Peterse, DJ (eds) Cattle Housing Systems, Lameness and Behaviour: Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science pp 129–147. Martinus Nijhoff: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Potter, MJ and Broom, DM 1990 Behaviour and welfare aspects of cattle lameness in relation to building design. In: Murray, R (ed) Proceedings of the Vth International Symposium on Ruminant Digit pp 80–84. British Cattle Veterinary Association: Liverpool, UKGoogle Scholar
Pryce, JE and Brotherstone, S 1999 Estimation of lifespan breeding values in the UK and their relationship with health and fertility traits. Interbull, Bulletin 21: 166–169Google Scholar
Pryce, JE, Esslemont, RJ, Thompson, R, Veerkamp, RF, Kossaibati, MA and Simm, G 1998 Estimation of genetic parameters using health, fertility and production data from a management recording system for dairy cattle. Animal Science 66: 577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce, JE, Simm, G, Amer, PR, Coffey, MP and Stott, AW 2000 Returns from genetic improvement of dairy cattle. Proceedings of 2000 British Society of Animal Science Winter Meeting. March 2000, Scarborough, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce, JE and Veerkamp, RF 2001 The incorporation of fertility indices in genetic improvement programmes. In: Diskin MG (ed) Fertility in the High-Producing Dairy Cow. British Society of Animal Science, Galway, Ireland, Occasional Publication 26: 237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajala-Schultz, PJ, Grohn, YT and McCulloch, CE 1999 Effects of milk fever, ketosis, and lameness on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 288–294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauw, WM, Kanis, E, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN and Grommers, FJ 1998 Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56: 15–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauw, WM 2008 Resource Allocation Theory Applied to Farm Animals. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Roxstrom, A 2001 Genetic aspects of fertility and longevity in dairy cattle. PhD Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Royal, MD, Darwash, AO, Flint, APF, Webb, R, Woolliams, JE and Lamming, GE 2000 Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Animal Science 70: 487–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupp, R and Boichard, D 1999 Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, production, udder type traits, and milking ease in first lactation Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 2198–2204Google ScholarPubMed
Rushen, J and de Passille, AM 1998 Behaviour, welfare and productivity in dairy cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78(S): 3–21Google Scholar
Russell, AM, Rowlands, GJ, Shaw, SR and Weaver, AD 1982 Survey of lameness in British dairy cattle. Veterinary Records 111: 155–160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sander-Nielsen, U, Pedersen, GA, Pedersen, J and S⊘rensen, P 1999 Genetic variation in disease traits and their relationships with survival in Danish dairy cattle. Interbull, Bulletin 21: 170–177Google Scholar
Sand⊘e, P, Nielsen, BL, Christensen, LG and S⊘rensen, P 1999 Staying good while playing God: the ethics of breeding farm animals. Animal Welfare 8: 313–328Google Scholar
Sheldon, IM, Williams, EJ, Miller, AN, Nash, DM and Herath, S 2008 Uterine diseases in cattle after parturition. Veterinary Journal 176: 115–121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SHS Annual Reports 2003 Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and Production. SHS; Eskilstuna, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Simm, G 1998 Genetic Improvement of Cattle and Sheep. Farming Press: Ipswich, UKGoogle Scholar
Smith, LA, Cassell, BG and Pearson, RE 1998 The effects of inbreeding on the lifetime performance of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2729–2737CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, JR, Everett, RW and Hammerschmidt, NL 2000 Effects of inbreeding on production and survival in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1856–1864CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Arendonk, JA and Liinamo, AE 2003 Dairy cattle production in Europe. Theriogenology 59: 563–569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Raden, PM 2004 Invited review: selection on net merit to improve lifetime profit. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 3125–3131Google Scholar
Veerkamp, RF 1998 Selection for economic efficiency of dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1109–1119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verkerk, GA, Morgan, S and Kolver, S 2000 Comparison of selected reproductive characteristics in Overseas and New Zealand Holstein-Friesian cows grazing pasture or fed a total mixed ration. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 60: 270–274Google Scholar
Webster, J 1993 Understanding the Dairy Cow, 2nd Edition. Blackwell: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar