Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T14:42:20.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human-wildlife interactions: the importance and benefits of effective training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J Lane
Affiliation:
The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK
V Jackson*
Affiliation:
The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK

Extract

Studies and projects undertaken under the auspices of conservation of wildlife are often treated as being synonymous with working to promote individual animal welfare. However, human interventions, with respect to wild animals, carry with them multiple risks for the animal subjects. Unfortunately, these risks and problems are sometimes given little consideration by practitioners, often because they are judged relative to natural processes or are incurred for the good of the species or population. Obviously, animals are subjected to a variety of natural factors likely to cause stress and poor welfare in the wild, and conservation and management of differing species to differing extents will probably always be necessary. However, in all these interventions, the welfare of the individual animal always needs to be upheld. One way of addressing this issue is by the provision of robust training. The Food and Environment Research Agency (Fera) have recently developed a training course (winner of the UFAW Wild Animal Welfare Award 2010) which centres around promoting and educating best practice in wildlife, particularly with respect to improved methods of capture, handling, marking and release. As well as standard training techniques, the course includes the use of practical scenarios and discussion platforms, tackling varying issues pertinent to working with wild species with the overall aim of ensuring high standards of welfare.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2013 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bermúdez, R, Faílde, LD, Losadab, AP, Nieto, JM and Quiroga, MI 2009 Toxoplasmosis in Bennett's wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus) in Spain. Veterinary Parasitology 160: 155158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.082CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, LJ 1997 An evaluation of some marking and trapping techniques currently used in the study of anuran population dynamics. Journal of Herpetology 31: 410419. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1565670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, J and McDonald, R 2010 Welfare and ‘best practice’ in field studies of wildlife. In: Hubrecht, R and Kirkwood, JK (eds) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research Animal, Eighth Edition pp 92107. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoyama, AK 1965 The effect of anaesthesia on milk yield and maintenance of lactation in the goat and rat. Journal of Endocrinology 33: 341351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.0330341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed