Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T05:16:58.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of mirrors on the welfare of caged rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

SE Jones  and
CJC Phillips
SE Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK
CJC Phillips*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Queensland, Australia
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: c.phillips@uq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mirrors can enrich the environment of some social animals kept in isolation. In this study, the effect of mirrors on the behaviour of isolated, or partially isolated, caged rabbits was tested. In a changeover experiment, four treatments were investigated: isolated without mirrors; partially isolated (with a conspecific housed behind a partition) without mirrors; isolated with mirrors; and partially isolated with mirrors. Behaviour was recorded during the first hour for which the rabbits were in the cages with the stimuli, and then again after one week. Initially, the rabbits' alertness increased, which may be because they perceived the mirror image to be a potential threat. The mirrors also stimulated investigation by the rabbits, which initially scraped them rapidly with their forepaws (scrabbling) and sniffed them. Although sniffing was maintained until the end of the week, scrabbling was not, probably because the rabbits failed to elicit the normal reactions of a conspecific from their mirror images. Mirrors also reduced the time rabbits spent sitting in their living area looking out of the cage, and increased their behavioural complexity, as determined from the number of behaviours performed per minute. In a second experiment, the responses of seven rabbits to four stimuli were recorded: a conspecific; a toy animal; a mirror; and a blank card. The rabbits were presented with pairs of stimuli at either end of a marked board. The responses of the rabbits to mirrors were more similar to their responses to a blank card or to a soft toy than to a conspecific. Although the rabbits did not respond to mirror images as if they were conspecifics, the mirrors may have had benefits to the complexity of behaviour of rabbits in small cages.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourcageisolationmirrorrabbitreflection
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , August 2005 , pp. 195 - 202
Copyright
© 2005 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berthelsen, H and Hansen, LT 1999 The effect of hay on the behaviour of caged rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Animal Welfare 8: 149–157Google Scholar
Davis, AW and Hall, WB 1969 Cyclic changeover designs. Biometrika 56: 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, GG 1970 Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science 167: 86–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, D and Morton, DB 1995 Inventory of the behaviour of New Zealand white rabbits in laboratory cages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 45: 277–292Google Scholar
Hansen, LT and Berthelsen, H 2000 The effect of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of caged rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 163–178Google ScholarPubMed
Held, SDE, Turner, RJ and Wootton, RJ 1995 Choices of laboratory rabbits for individual or group-housing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46: 81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, RB 2001 Does occasional movement make pecking devices more attractive to domestic chicks? British Poultry Science 42: 43–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambeth, SP and Bloomsmith, MA 1991 Mirrors as enrichment for the captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Primatologists. Laboratory Animal Science 42: 261–266Google Scholar
Leslie, TK, Dalton, L and Phillips, CJC 2003 Preference of domestic rabbits for grass or coarse mix feeds. Animal Welfare 13: 57–62Google Scholar
Lidfors, L 1997 Behavioural effects of environmental enrichment for individually caged rabbits. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 52: 157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockley, RM 1961 Social structure and stress in the rabbit warren. Journal of Animal Ecology 30: 385–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, LM, Mills, DS and Cooper, JJ 2002 The use of mirrors for the control of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78: 159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, DS and Davenport, K 2002 The effect of a neighbouring conspecific versus the use of a mirror for the control of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Animal Science 74: 95–101Google Scholar
Parrott, RF, Houpt, KA and Misson, BH 1988 Modification of the responses of sheep to isolation stress by the use of mirror panels. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19: 331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, CAK, Stookey, JM and Watts, JM 1999 Effects of mirror-image exposure on heart rate and movement of isolated heifers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63: 93–102Google Scholar
Podberscek, AL, Blackshaw, JK and Beattie, AW 1991 The behaviour of group penned and individually caged laboratory rabbits. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, D and Marino, L 2001 Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: a case of cognitive convergence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 98: 5937–5942CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal Society for the Protection of Animals (RSPCA) Undated Keeping Rabbits in Groups. Animal care leaflet P04. RSPCA: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Ryan, TA Jr, Joiner, BL and Ryan, BF 1980 Minitab Reference Manual. Statistics Department, Pennsylvania State University, USAGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, CM 2004 Mirrors as potential environmental enrichment for individually housed laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87: 95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffacher, M 1992 Group housing and enrichment cages for breeding fattening and laboratory rabbits. Animal Welfare 1: 105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vastrade, M 1987 Spacing behaviour of free-ranging domestic rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus L. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar