Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:29:37.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Group Housing in an Enlarged Cage System on Growth, Bite Wounds and Adrenal Cortex Function in Farmed Blue Foxes (Alopex Lagopus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

L Ahola ,
M Harri ,
S Kasanen ,
J Mononen  and
T Pyykönen
L Ahola*
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
M Harri
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
S Kasanen
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
J Mononen
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
T Pyykönen
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been claimed that the present farming environment does not meet foxes’ needs for social behaviour. In this study we measured the welfare of farmed blue foxes, Alopex lagopus, housed in two different social and spatial conditions: i) traditional housing (group T) where a male and a female cub were housed together and their vixen alone in standard (1.2m2) fox cages; and ii) family housing (group F) where a vixen and her five cubs were housed together in a connected six-cage system (7.2m2). Production-related welfare parameters (weight gain and the incidence of bite wounds on fur) as well as physiological ones (adrenal mass and serum Cortisol response to ACTH administration) were measured in these two groups.

No differences were found in any of the measured parameters between the vixens housed in traditional and family units. In cubs, there was less difference between the sexes in weight gain in group F than in group T, and a significantly lower weight gain was evident only in group T female cubs. The serum Cortisol level in response to an ACTH challenge was higher in group T cubs and independent of the sex of the animal, while heavier adrenals were observed in group T male cubs only. We conclude that the enlarged cage system combined with group housing had some beneficial effects on the measured performance- and welfare-related indicators in blue fox cubs.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourbite woundsfur farmingsocial behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , November 2000 , pp. 403 - 412
Copyright
© 2000 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, R M 1997 Home ranges and movements of arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) in western Alaska. Arctic 50: 147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M 1977 Mammalian dispersal and the ontogeny of individual behavioral phenotypes. The American Naturalist 111: 715–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, D and Johnson, K G 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman & Hall, London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesemore, D L 1975 Ecology of the arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) in North America - a review. In: Fox, M W (ed) The Wild Canids. Their Systematics, Behavioral Ecology and Evolution pp 143–163. Robert E Krieger: Malabar, USAGoogle Scholar
Eberhardt, L E, Hanson, W C, Bengtson, J L, Garrott, R A and Hanson, E E 1982 Arctic fox home range characteristics in an oil-development area. Journal of Wildlife Management 46: 183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Convention 1998 Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes, 36th Meeting, Strasbourg, 24-27 November 1998. Recommendation Concerning Fur Animals. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
Frafjord, K 1993 Agonistic behaviour and dominance relations of captive arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) in Svalbard. Behavioural Processes 29: 239–252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frafjord, K 1992 Denning behaviour and activity of arctic fox Alopex lagopus pups: Implications of food availability. Polar Biology 12: 707–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A F and Broom, D M 1990 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare, 3rd edition. Baillière Tindall, London, UKGoogle Scholar
Garrott, R A, Eberhardt, L E and Hanson, W C 1984 Arctic fox denning behaviour in northern Alaska. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 1636–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, P J, Rhind, S M, Hamilton, W J, Macdonald, A J, Fawcett, A R, Soanes, C and McMillen, S R 1994 The adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation test: its potential use and limitations in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Candian Journal of Zoology 72: 1826–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S and Smith, G C 1987 Demography of two urban fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heroux, O 1960 Adjustment of adrenal cortex and thyroid during cold acclimation. Federal Proceedings 19(Suppl 5): 82–85Google Scholar
Hersteinsson, P and Macdonald, W 1982 Some comparisons between red and arctic foxes, Vulpes vulpes and Alopex lagopus, as revealed by radio tracking. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 49: 259–289Google Scholar
Hiruki, L M and Stirling, J 1989 Population dynamics of the arctic fox, Alopex lagopus, on Bank Islands, Northwest Territories. Canadian Field-Naturalist 103: 380–387Google Scholar
Korhonen, H and Alasuutari, S 1994 Social relationships and reproductive performance in group-living arctic blue foxes. Agricultural Science in Finland 3: 49–58Google Scholar
Korhonen, H and Alasuutari, S 1995 Dominance relations in captive groups of adult and juvenile arctic blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Polar Biology 15: 353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, H and Niemelä, P 1996 Effect of environment and social enrichment on some welfare variables in farm blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Scientifur 20: 26–43Google Scholar
Kullberg, C and Angerbjörn, A 1992 Social behaviour and cooperative breeding in arctic foxes, Alopex lagopus (L.), in a semi-natural environment. Ethology 90: 321–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, A H 1969 The dynamics of Canadian arctic fox populations. Canadian Wildlife Service Report Series 8: 1 -52Google Scholar
Meunier-Salaun, M C, Vantrimponte, M N, Raab, A and Dantzer, R 1987 Effect of floor area restriction upon performance, behavior and physiology of growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 64: 1371–1377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, V 1994 Long-term effects of different handling procedures on behavioural, physiological, and production-related parameters in silver foxes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T 1999 Behavioural tests in welfare research of foxes. Published PhD thesis. Kuopio University Publications C. Natural and Environmental Sciences 92. Kuopio University: Kuopio, FinlandGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T, Harri, M, Jalkanen, L and Mononen, J 1999 Relationship between hyponeophagia and adrenal cortex function in farmed foxes. Physiology & Behavior 65: 779–783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushen, J 1991 Problems associated with the interpretation of physiological data in the assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 381 -386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selye, H 1950 The Physiology and Pathology of Exposure to Stress. Acta Inc: Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Wakely, L G and Mallory, F F 1988 Hierarchical development, agonistic behaviours, and growth rates in captive arctic fox. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 1672–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar