Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T22:43:54.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Challenges to implementing animal welfare standards in New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

CE O’Connor*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Standards, Ministry for Primary Industries, PO Box 2526, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
ACD Bayvel
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Standards, Ministry for Primary Industries, PO Box 2526, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Cheryl.O’Connor@mpi.govt.nz

Abstract

The New Zealand Animal Welfare Act 1999 imposes a duty of care on all owners and persons in charge, to provide for the physical, health and behavioural needs of the animals in their care. The Act provides for the development of codes of welfare by the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) and gives legal status to the minimum standards that they contain when issued by the Minister of Agriculture. Codes are used to promote appropriate behaviour, establish minimum standards of animal care and encourage best practice by those in charge of animals. One of the main challenges in developing codes of welfare is to integrate the various, and often conflicting, social, ethical, economic and production management value judgments, with the available science, in a way that does not stifle innovation or require frequent alteration of the codes. In New Zealand we believe this is best achieved using minimum standards which are designed as animal-orientated statements of desired welfare outcomes, accompanied by one or more indicators by which achievement of the outcome can be measured or objectively assessed. Codes are primarily directed at educating the owners or persons in charge of animals of their legal obligations, encouraging voluntary compliance, and supporting industries in the development of compliance and quality assurance programmes. The challenge is to develop a consistent, whole-of-system approach to animal welfare compliance that focuses on interventions which encourage voluntary compliance or deter non-compliance before offending becomes serious and animal welfare is unnecessarily compromised. The aim of this paper is to describe New Zealand's policy, which is to develop outcome-based welfare standards, to promote and demonstrate maximum voluntary industry compliance with them, and to ensure that any serious breaches are detected and responded to effectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayvel, ACD and Cross, N 2010 Animal welfare: a complex domestic and international public-policy issue: who are the key players? Journal of Veterinary Medicine 37: 312Google ScholarPubMed
Blokhuis, HJ, Veissier, I, Miele, M and Jones, B 2010 The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: Safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science 60: 129140Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1979 Press statement. Available at http://www.fawc.org.uk. (Accessed 25 January 2012)Google Scholar
Gavinelli, A, Ferrara, M and Simonin, D 2008 Formulating policies for the welfare of animals during long distance transportation. Veterinaria Italiana 44: 7186Google ScholarPubMed
MAF 2010 Safeguarding our Animals, Safeguarding our Reputation: Improving Animal Welfare Compliance in New Zealand. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry: Wellington, New Zealand. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/regs/animalwelfare/pubs/safeguarding-our-animals.pdfGoogle Scholar
MAF 2011 What New Zealanders Really Think About Animal Welfare. MAF Technical Paper No 2011/55. Available at www.maf.govt.nz/news-resources/publications.aspxGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ and Bayvel, ACD 2007 New Zealand's inclusive science-based system for setting animal welfare standards. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113: 313329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAWAC 2008 Proceedings of the round table discussion on animal welfare assurance. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/regs/animalwelfare/pubs/nawac/nawac-welfare-assurance-workshop.pdfGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, CE and Littin, KE 2011 Animal welfare policy and science— keeping up with a changing world. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 71: 178202Google Scholar
O’Connor, C and Wilson, A 2009 Are the animal welfare codes better than the law before and do they make enforcement more effective? Proceedings of the Food Safety, Animal Welfare and Biosecurity Branch of the NZVA 246: 2124Google Scholar
O’Hara, P and O’Connor, C 2007 Challenge of developing regulations for production animals that produce the welfare outcomes we want. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2: 205212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrini, A and Wilson, D 2005 Philosophy, policy and procedures of the World Organisation for Animal Health for the development of standards in animal welfare. Animal Welfare: Global Issues, Trends and Challenges. Revue Scientifique et Technique Office International des Épizooties 24: 665671CrossRefGoogle Scholar