Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T07:23:02.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural and Neural Correlates of Mental Imagery in Sheep Using Face Recognition Paradigms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

K M Kendrick ,
A Leigh  and
J Peirce
K M Kendrick*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge CB1 6NE, UK
A Leigh
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge CB1 6NE, UK
J Peirce
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge CB1 6NE, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Determining objective measures for proof of consciousness in non-human animals has been helped by improved understanding of neural correlates of human consciousness. Functional imaging and neuropsychological studies have shown remarkable overlap between structures involved in actual perception of social and non-social objects and those involved in forming mental images of them. One area of particular interest is individual face recognition. This involves regions of the temporal lobe that are mainly only activated by actual perception or mental imagery of faces. Using behavioural, neuroanatomical and neurophysiological approaches in sheep, we have found that they have similar specialized abilities for recognizing many individuals from their faces. They have developed the same specialized neural processing regions in the temporal lobe for aiding such recognition. Furthermore, parallel activation of other brain regions controlling behavioural and emotional responses only occurs when they are overtly interested in the individuals whose faces they perceive. Such interest might therefore equate to their becoming consciously aware of them. Preliminary experiments have indicated that sheep may form and use mental images and that the regions of the temporal lobe that respond to faces can also do so under conditions where faces are suggested but do not actually appear. Such similarities between humans and sheep in this form of social recognition make it difficult to claim that humans can form mental images of faces whereas sheep cannot. While the ability to form and use mental imagery is not in itself definitive proof of consciousness, it is an important component part.

Keywords

animal welfarebrainconsciousnessface recognitionmental imagerysheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue S1: Consciousness, Cognition and Animal Welfare: Proceedings of the UFAW Symposium, Zoological Society of London, 11-12 May 2000 , February 2001 , pp. S89 - S101
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broad, K D, Mimmack, M L and Kendrick, K M 2000 Is right hemisphere specialization for face discrimination specific to humans? European Journal of Neuroscience 12: 731–741Google ScholarPubMed
Crick, F and Koch, C 1990 Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences 2: 263–275Google Scholar
Crick, F and Koch, C 1995 Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature 375.121-123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, R and Carey, S 1986 Why faces are and are not special - an effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology — General 115: 107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, H D and Shepherd, J W 1975 Recognition of upright and inverted faces presented in the left and right visual fields. Cortex 11: 3–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, H D, Shepherd, J W and Davies, G M 1979 Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception 8: 431–439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabre-Nys, C, Ohkura, S and Kendrick, K M 1997 Male faces and odours evoke differential patterns of neurochemical release in the mediobasal hypothalamus of the ewe during oestrus: an insight into sexual motivation. European Journal of Neuroscience 9: 1666–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farah, M J 1995 Current issues in the neuropsychology of image generation. Neuropsychologia 33: 1455–1471CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farah, M J and Feinberg, T E 1997 Consciousness of perception after brain damage. Seminars in Neurology 17: 145–152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, I and Tarr, M J 1997 Becoming a ‘greeble’ expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research 37: 1673–1682CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, I, Tarr, M J, Anderson, A W, Skudlarski, P and Gore, J C 1999 Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience 2: 568573CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, I, Skudlarski, P, Gore, J C and Anderson, A W 2000 Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience 3: 191–197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C M 1994 Social cognition in primates. In: Mackintosh, J (ed) Animal Learning and Cognition pp 281–305. Academic Press: San Diego, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W 1879 Are we automata? Mind 4: 1 -22Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N, Chun, M M, McDermott, J and Ledden, P J 1996 Functional imaging of human visual recognition. Cognitive Brain Research 5: 55–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanwisher, N, McDermott, J and Chun, M M 1997 The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17: 4302–4311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendrick, K M 1990 Neural processing of visual recognition of individuals in sheep. In: Zayan, R and Dantzer, D (eds) Social Stress in Domestic Animals, Volume 53 pp 145–156. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, KM 1991 How the sheep's brain controls the visual recognition of animals and humans. Journal of Animal Science 69: 5008–5016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendrick, K M 1994 Neurobiological correlates of visual and olfactory recognition in sheep. Behavioural Processes 33: 89–111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendrick, K M 1997 Animal awareness. British Society for Animal Science Occasional Publication 20: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K M 1998 Intelligent perception. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 57: 213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K M and Baldwin, B A 1987 Cells in temporal cortex of conscious sheep can respond preferentially to the sight of faces. Science 236: 448–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K M, Atkins, K, Hinton, M R, Broad, K D, Fabre-Nys, C and Keverne, EB 1995 Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep. Animal Behaviour 49: 1665–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K M, Atkins, K, Hinton, M R, Heavens, P and Keverne, E B 1996 Are faces special for sheep - evidence from facial and object discrimination-learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity. Behavioural Processes 38: 19–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendrick, K M, Hinton, M R, Atkins, K, Haupt, M A and Skinner, J D 1998 Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature 395: 229–230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kentridge, R W, Heywood, C A and Weiskrantz, L 1999 Attention without awareness in blindsight. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266: 1805–1811CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, C and Braun, J 1996 Towards the neuronal correlate of visual awareness. Current Neurobiology 6: 158–164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosslyn, S M, Thompson, W L, Kim, I J and Alpert, N M 1995 Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature 378: 496–498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bihan, D, Turner, R, Zeffiro, T A, Cuénod, C A, Jezzard, P and Bonnerot, V 1993 Activation of human primary visual cortex during visual recall: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 90: 11802–11805CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, J, Trevarthen, C and Sperry, R W 1972 Perception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric disconnection. Brain 95: 61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, J, Heller, W, Banich, M T and Burton, L A 1983 Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces. Brain and Cognition 2: 404–419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, G, Puce, A, Gore, J C and Allison, T 1997 Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9: 605–610CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, A D and Goodale, M A 1995 The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Ohkura, S, Fabre-Nys, C, Broad, K D and Kendrick, K M 1997 Sex hormones enhance the impact of male sensory cues on both primary and association cortical components of visual and olfactory processing pathways as well as in limbic and hypothalamic regions in female sheep. Neuroscience 80: 285–297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overman, W H and Doty, R W 1982 Hemispheric specialization displayed by man but not macaques for analysis of faces. Neuropsychologia 20: 113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, J W 2000 Effects of Hemispheric Asymmetry and Configural Coding in Sheep Face Recognition. PhD Thesis: University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Peirce, J W, Leigh, A E and Kendrick, K M 2000 Configurational coding, familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep. Neuropsychologia 38: 475–483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, G 1993 Configural coding, expertise, and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition. Brain and Cognition 22: 19–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweinberger, S R, Klos, T and Sommer, W 1995 Covert face recognition in prosopagnosia: a dissociable function? Cortex 31: 517–529CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sergent, J and Signoret, J L 1992 Functional and anatomical decomposition of face processing: evidence from prosopagnosia and PET study of normal patients. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Science 335: 55–61Google Scholar
Sergent, J, Ohta, S and Macdonald, B 1992 Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing - a positron emission tomography study. Brain 115: 15–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soltysik, S S and Baldwin, B A 1972 The performance of goats in triple choice delayed response tasks. Acta Neurobiologica Experimenta 32: 73–86Google ScholarPubMed
Ungerleider, L G and Haxby, J V 1994 ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain. Current Neurobiology 4: 157–165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wojciulik, E, Kanwisher, N and Driver, J 1998 Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology 79: 1574–1578CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, A A and Roberts, W A 1996 Monkey and human face perception: inversion effects for human faces but not for monkey faces or scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8: 278–290CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, R K 1969 Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81: 141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A W 1994 Neuropsychology of awareness. In: Revonsuo, A and Kamppinnen, M (eds) Consciousness in Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, USAGoogle Scholar
Young, A W, Hay, D C, McWeeny, K H, Flude, B M and Ellis, A W 1985 Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception 14: 737–746CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed