Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:43:04.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animal welfare considerations in primate rehabilitation: an assessment of three vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops) releases in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

AJ Guy ,
OML Stone  and
D Curnoe
AJ Guy*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2052
OML Stone
Affiliation:
School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2052
D Curnoe
Affiliation:
School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2052
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: amanda.guy@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluates the methods utilised to release and monitor three troops of rehabilitated vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) in South Africa. In all cases, monitoring was poor and conducted over a short time-frame disallowing release outcomes to be fully assessed. Wild troops were present at two of the three locations, casting doubt upon sightings of released monkeys and indicating that the release sites chosen were unsuitable and presented disease risks to the wild vervets. Eighty-three percent of monkeys were unaccounted for at the end of monitoring. Any future releases should make use of radio or GPS collars to track the monkeys, have a planned monitoring schedule covering a period of at least one year, collect detailed data on behaviour, demographics and ecology and should follow the IUCN Guidelines for Non-Human Primate Re-introductions.

Keywords

animal welfareChlorocebus aethiopsprimaterehabilitationreleaseSouth Africa
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 511 - 515
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, LR 2002 Guidelines for nonhuman primate re-introductions. Re-introduction News 21Google Scholar
Beck, B, Walkup, K, Rodrígues, M, Unwin, S, Travis, D and Stoinski, T 2007 Best practice guidelines for the re-introduction of Great Apes. SSC Primate Specialist Group of the World Conservation Union: Gland, Switzerland. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2007.SSC-OP.35.enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, EJ, Else, JG and Altman, J 1985 Ecology and behaviour of a pest primate: vervet monkeys in a tourist-lodge habitat. African Journal of Ecology 23: 35–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1985.tb00710.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britt, A, Welch, C, Katz, A and Freeman, K 2008 Supplementation of the black and white ruffed lemur population with captive-bred individuals in the Betampona Reserve, eastern Madagascar, In: Soorae, PS (ed) Global Re-introduction Perspectives. Re-introduction Case-studies from Around the Globe pp 197–201.IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group: Abu Dhabi, USAGoogle Scholar
Cheyne, SM, Campbell, CO and Payne, KL 2012 Proposed guidelines for in situ gibbon rescue, rehabilitation and reintroduction. International Zoo Yearbook 46: 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.2011.00149.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, MR and Mayeaux, DJ 1992 Aggressive and affiliative behavior in green monkeys with differing housing complexity. Aggressive Behavior 18: 231–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:3<231::AID-AB2480180306>3.0.CO;2-73.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, AA 1996 Disease risks of wildlife translocations. Conservation Biology 10: 349–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020349.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R and Barrett, L 2000 Cousins Our Primate Relatives. BBC Worldwide Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife 2008 Norms and Standards for the Management of Primates in KwaZulu-Natal. Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife: Cascades, KZN, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Guy, AJ, Stone, OML and Curnoe, D 2011 The release of a troop of rehabilitated vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) in KwaZulu-Natal South Africa: outcomes and assessment. Folia Primatologica 82: 308–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000337269CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, AJ, Stone, OML and Curnoe, D 2012 Assessment of the release of a troop of rehabilitated vervet monkeys to the Ntendeka Wilderness area, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa: A case study. Primates 53: 171–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10329-011-0292-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henzi, P 1979 The vervet crisis. African Wildlife 33: 8–10Google Scholar
King, T, Chamberlan, C and Courage, A 2006 Gorilla reintroduction, Republic of Congo. PASA/IUCN African Primate Reintroduction Workshop. John Aspinall Foundation: Apeldoorn, Congo, AfricaGoogle Scholar
Saj, TL, Sicotte, P and Paterson, JD 2001 The conflict between vervet monkeys and farmers at the forest edge in Entebbe, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 39: 195–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0141-6707.2000.00299.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, S 2010 Monkey Helpline Charts, Report. Monkey Helpline: Durban, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Swallow, J, Anderson, D, Buckwell, AC, Harris, T, Hawkins, P, Kirkwood, J, Lomas, M, Meacham, S, Peters, A, Prescott, M, Owen, S, Quest, R, Sutcliffe, R and Thomson, KV 2005 Guidance on the transport of laboratory animals. Laboratory Animals 39: 1–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/0023677052886493CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tooze, ZJ and Baker, LR 2008 Re-introduction of mona monkeys to supplement a depleted population in community forest in southeast Nigeria, In: Soorae, PS (ed) Global Re-introduction Perspectives. Reintroduction Case-studies from Around the Globe pp 207–212.IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group: Abu Dhabi, UAEGoogle Scholar
Viggers, KL, Lindenmayer, DB and Spratt, DM 1993 The importance of disease in reintroduction programmes. Wildlife Research 20: 687–698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR9930687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimberger, K, Downs, CT and Boyes, RS 2010a A survey of wildlife rehabilitation in South Africa: is there a need for improved management? Animal Welfare 19: 481–499Google Scholar
Wimberger, K, Downs, CT and Perin, MR 2010b Postrelease success of two rehabilitated vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops) troops in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Folia Primatologica 81: 96–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000314636CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed