Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:02:27.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of monensin in European pasture cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. I. D. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Lilly Research Centre Ltd, Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, Surrey
W. G. C. Appleby
Affiliation:
Elanco Products Ltd, Kingsclere Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2XA
D. C. J. Shaw
Affiliation:
Elanco Products Ltd, Kingsclere Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2XA
G. Lebas
Affiliation:
Eli Lilly France SA, 203 Bureaux de la Colline, 92 St Cloud, France
R. Pflug
Affiliation:
Eli Lilly GmbH, Niederlassung Bad Homburg, 638 Bad Homburg, Marienbader Platz, West Germany
Get access

Extract

Monensin increases propionic acid production in the rumen and improves the efficiency of feed conversion in fattening cattle. Trials carried out in the USA showed that 200 mg monensin/head per day was the optimum dose for increasing the rate of live-weight gain in beef cattle at pasture.

Twelve pasture trials, involving a total of 434 beef cattle, were carried out during 1976 and 1977 to assess the efficacy of monensin for grazing cattle under European conditions. Each trial compared a group given 200 mg monensin/head per day in 0·5 to 10 kg of carrier supplement with a negative control group, fed blank supplement. The average initial live-weight was 260 kg and the average trial duration was 119 days. Daily live-weight gains of the control and monensin-treated cattle averaged 0·786 and 0·893 kg/head per day respectively, an advantage of 107g/head per day or 13·7 % in favour of the monensin treatment (P<0·001). The growth-promoting effect of monensin showed no tendency to diminish with time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Davis, G. V. and Erhart, A. B. 1976. Effects of monensin and urea in finishing steer rations. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geay, Y. and Beranger, C. 1977. [Use of an anticoccidial drug (monensin) in the diet of ruminants. I.—Effect on fattening performances of young bulls.] Annls Zootech. 26: 5968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D. R., Martin, J. R. and Lake, R. 1976. High, medium and low corn silage diets with and without monensin for feedlot steers. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 363368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, T. W., Beeson, W. M. and Mohler, M. T. 1976. Effect of monensin on beef cattle performance. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 761765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, E. L., Cooley, C. O., Richardson, L. F., Raun, A. P. and Rathmacher, R. P. 1976. The effect of monensin on performance of cattle fed forage. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 665669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, E. L., Raun, A. P., Cooley, C. O., Rathmacher, R. P. and Richardson, L. F. 1976. Effect of monensin on carcass characteristics, carcass composition and efficiency of converting feed to carcass. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 678683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raun, A. P., Cooley, C. O., Potter, E. L., Rathmacher, R. P. and Richardson, L. F. 1976. Effect of monensin on feed efficiency of feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 670677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, L. F., Raun, A. P., Potter, E. L., Cooley, C. O. and Rathmacher, R. P. 1976. Effect of monensin on rumen fermentation in vitro and in vivo. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 657664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. The comparison of two samples. In Statistical Methods. 6th ed., pp. 91119. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Turner, H. A., Raleigh, R. J. and Young, D. C. 1977. Effect of monensin on feed efficiency for maintaining gestating mature cows wintered on meadow hay. J. Anim. Sci. 44: 338342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utley, P. R., Newton, G. L., Ritter, R. J. III and McCormick, W. C. 1976. Effects of feeding monensin in combination with zeranol and testosterone-estradiol implants for growing and finishing heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 754760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar