Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:21:12.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The selection of dairy bulls for artificial insemination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. J. M. Hinks
C. J. M. Hinks
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Summary

A numerical model of AI selection procedures has been constructed in an attempt to assess the efficiency of current selection methods and to examine possibilities for their improvement. The results indicate that (1) present selection methods are relatively efficient in their utilization of test resources, but much less efficient in their usage of tested bulls. Additional investments in bull testing are likely to profit the dairy industry. (2) The main effects of improved bull utilization are (a) to permit increases in selection pressure with no increase in cost over current selection procedures and (b) to extend the limits to profitable selection. (3) The adoption of alternative stud management systems, in which bulls are slaughtered early in life, are likely to require excessively large investments in semen processing and storage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , November 1970 , pp. 569 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dickinson, F. N. and Mcdaniel, B. T. 1969. Status and potential for increasing production and income over feed cost for dairymen. J. Dairy Set. 52: 1464–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindhé, B. 1969. Model simulation of A.I. breeding within a dual-purpose breed of cattle. Acta. Agric. scand. 18: 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maijala, K. 1969. Finnish Animal Husbandry. Helsinki. 102 pp.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1960–1969. Annual Reports of the Production Division.Google Scholar
New Zealand Dairy Board. 1969. 44th Farm Production Report.Google Scholar
Rendel, J. M. and Robertson, Alan. 1950. Selection within a closed herd of dairy cattle. J. Genet. 50: 1–8.Google Scholar
Skjervold, H. and Langholz, H. J. 1964. Factors affecting the optimum structure of A.I. breeding in dairy cattle. Z. Tierzücht ZüchtBiol. 80: 25–40.Google Scholar
Skjervold, H. 1966. Selection schemes in relation to artificial insemination. Proc. 9th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Edinburgh, pp. 250–261.Google Scholar
Soller, M., Baranan, R. and Pasternak, H. 1966. Selection of dairy cattle for growth and milk production. Anim. Prod. 8: 109–120.Google Scholar