Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:31:22.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rumen degradation of straw. 10. Consistency of differences in nutritive value between varieties of cereal straws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. R. Ørskov
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
W. J. Shand
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
D. Tedesco
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
L. A. F. Morrice
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

The consistency of differences between varieties in nutritive value of cereal straws was tested over 3 years consecutively for nine varieties of spring barley and 10 varieties of winter wheat straw and over 2 years consecutively for 12 varieties of winter barley and six varieties of oats. For all varieties there were large year-to-year differences in nutritive value measured by ruminal degradation characteristics using the nylon bag technique. For spring barley there were large differences between varieties and the correlations between varieties in different years were mostly in excess of r = 0·90 for 48-h degradability and maximum potential degradability. For winter wheat the correlations between varieties for different years were lower but mostly significant. For the winter barley differences between varieties were less, but even so differences between varieties in different years were significant. For oats differences between the varieties were small and there was no significant correlation within varieties between years. The results suggest that the nutritive value of cereal straws is generally consistent between years and is a characteristic that could be improved by selection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bainton, S. J., Plumb, V. E., Capper, B. S. and Juliano, B. O. 1987 Botanical composition chemical analysis and cellulase solubility of rice straw from different varieties. Animal Production 44: 481 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hartley, R. D., Deschard, G., Keene, A. S. and Mason, V. C. 1984. Changes in the chemical constitution of cereal straw and poor quality hay during upgrading. In Improvements in the Nutritive Value of Crops and By-products by Chemical or Biological Treatments. Proceedings of Second Seminar on the Upgrading of Crops and By-products, Hurley, pp. 1114. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.Google Scholar
Kernan, J. A., Coxworth, E. C., Crowle, W. L. and Spurr, D. T. 1984. The nutritional value of crop residue components from several wheat cultivars grown at different fertilizer levels. Animal Feed Science and Technology 11: 301311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1985. Evaluation of crop residues and agroindustrial by-products using the nylon bag method. In FAO/ILCA Guidelines for Research of Crop Residues (ed. Preston, T. R., Kossila, V. V., Goodwin, J. and Reed, S.), pp. 126133. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. and Kay, M. 1988. Prediction of intake by cattle from degradation characteristics of roughages. Animal Production 46: 2934.Google Scholar
Ramanzin, M., Ørskov, E. R. and Tuah, A. K. 1986. Rumen degradation of straw. 2. Botanical fractions of straw from two barley cultivars. Animal Production 43: 271278.Google Scholar
Rexen, F. and Munck, L. 1984. Cereal crops for industrial use in Europe. European Economic Community Publication EUR 9617EM.Google Scholar
SHAND, W. J., ØRSKOV, E. R. and Morrice, L. A. F. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 5. Botanical fractions and degradability of different varieties of oat and wheat straws. Animal Production 47: 387392.Google Scholar
Soebarinoto, S., Chuzaemi, S. and Van Bruchem, J. 1989. Nutritive value of rice straw varieties in Indonesia as related to location and urea treatment. Paper given at Meeting on Tropical Animal Production, Agricultural University, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Tuah, A. K., Lufadeju, E., Orskov, E. R. and Blackett, G. A. 1986. Rumen degradation of straw. 1. Untreated and ammonia-treated barley, oat and wheat straw varieties and triticale straw. Animal Production 43: 261269.Google Scholar
Walli, T. K., Orskov, E. R. and Bhargava, P. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 3. Botanical fractions of two rice straw varieties and effects of ammonia treatment. Animal Production 46: 347352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar