Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:19:34.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the effect of individual penning on the performance of fattening pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. C. Patterson
D. C. Patterson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DP
Get access

Abstract

Individual and group-penning, and entire male and female sexes were investigated in a factorial design. The size of group was five pigs. The diets were given to a scale based on live weight.

Individual penning gave significantly faster gains than group penning (679 v. 653 g/day, P < 0·01) but the improvement in food conversion ratio was not significant. Loin sample joints from individually-penned pigs had less lean and significantly more fat than did those from group-penned pigs. The faster growth rate and greater fatness of the individually-penned pigs indicated that more energy was retained by these animals and it was concluded that the greater retention of energy derived primarily from an apparently reduced metabolic heat production. The associated increase in initial growth rate was accentuated by the nature of the feeding scale.

There was some indication that boars did not grow as well as gilts in individual pens. Boars grew faster than gilts and converted food more efficiently to live-weight gain especially above 50 kg. They had lower killing-out yields and less fat than gilts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 185 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, D. E., Jensen, A. H., Harmon, B. G. and Norton, H. W. 1964. Factors affecting the response of the pig to a restricted intake of feed. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 1206 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. 1968. PIDA dissection techniques. Proc. Symp. Meth. Carcass Evaluation, Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., Dublin. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, D. P. 1964. Physical injury and its effects on protein metabolism. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism, Vol. 2 (ed. Munro, H. N. and Allison, J. B.), pp. 373–414. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F. 1981. Sex differences in the nutrition and growth of pigs. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1980 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 157–169. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlbach, G. D., Becker, D. E., Cox, J. L., Harmon, B. G. and Jensen, A. H. 1966. Effect of floor space allowance and number per group on performance of growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 386–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. P., Brain, P. F. and Benton, D. 1978. The effects of duration of individual and group penning on behaviour and andrenocortical reactivity in male mice. Physiol. Behav. 21: 757–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. A. 1971. Sex differences in emotional behaviour including man: endocrine bases. Ada psychol. 35: 29–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Hanrahan, T. J. 1981. Observations on the effects of stocking rate on the performance of gilts and boars to bacon weight. In The Welfare of Pigs (ed. Sybesme, W.), pp. 141–147. Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C. W. and Close, W. H. 1977. The influence of climatic variables on energy metabolism and associated aspects of productivity in the pig. In Nutrition and the Climatic Environment (ed. Haresign, W., Swann, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 51–73. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Hughes, B. O. 1975. The concept of an optimum stocking density and its selection for egg production. In Economic Factors Affecting Egg Production (ed. Freeman, B. M. and Boorman, K. N.), pp. 271–298. British Poultry Science Ltd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1971. The Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock — Pigs. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Smith, J. S. and Brockway, J. M 1972. Effects of isolation, confinement and competition for feed on the energy exchanges of growing lambs. Anim. Prod. 15: 189–201.Google Scholar