Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:56:50.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meal patterns of dairy cows consuming mixed foods with a high or a low ratio of concentrate to grass silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

B. J. Tolkamp ,
N. C. Friggens ,
G. C. Emmans ,
I. Kyriazakis  and
J. D. Oldham
B. J. Tolkamp*
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Health Department, Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
N. C. Friggens
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Health Department, Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
G. C. Emmans
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Health Department, Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
I. Kyriazakis
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Health Department, Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
J. D. Oldham
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Health Department, Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
*
† E-mail: b.tolkamp@ed.sac.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

With the aim of testing the effects of food quality on meal patterns 127 213 visits by 22 lactating cows to 12 computerized feeders supplying two foods, high forage (HF) and high concentrate (HC) consisting of grass silage and concentrate were analysed. The foods were composed of the same ingredients but the proportion of concentrate dry matter (DM) in the food DM differed between HC (0·59) and HF (0·27). Each of the foods was offered ad libitum to 11 cows from the start of lactation until 156 (s.e. 9) days after calving. Mean daily fresh food intake (49·2 kg) was not affected by treatment. Mean daily intake of DM differed between HC (23·6 kg) and HF (17·8 kg). After estimating individual meal criteria, visits were grouped into meals. The mean daily number of meals was 6·6, the mean fresh food intake per meal was 7·6 kg and neither was affected by treatment. Cows consuming HF had longer meals (41·4 v. 31·3 min) but a lower feeding rate than cows consuming HC (233 v. 337 g of fresh food per min and 78 v. 156 g DM per min). Pre- and post-prandial correlation coefficients were sometimes statistically significant but always low (R2 from 0 to 0·05) and not affected by treatment. Food intake per hour of the feeding cycle (defined as the intake during a meal divided by length of the meal plus the duration of the preceding between-meal interval) showed a diurnal pattern in the shape of a sine-wave with low values of about 1·5 kg/h for cycles starting just after midnight and high values of more than 3·0 kg/h for cycles starting just after noon. Neither the mean, nor the amplitude, nor the shift of the sine-wave were affected by treatment. The data suggest that similar mechanisms are responsible for the short-term intake regulation of HC and HF. No evidence was found to suggest that the diurnal meal pattern of cows consuming HF deviated from that of cows consuming HC as a result of differences between foods in constraints related to their physical properties.

Keywords

cowsconcentratesfeeding behaviourfood intakeforagemeal patterns
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 369 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, M. S. 1996. Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 74: 3063–3075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, M. S. 2000. Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1598–1624.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. and Campling, R. C. 1962. Regulation of voluntary food intake in ruminants. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 32: 669–686.Google ScholarPubMed
Campling, R. C. 1966. The effect of concentrates on the rate of disappearance of digesta from the alimentary tract of cows given hay. Journal of Dairy Research 33: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Morgan, C. A. 1981. Eating behaviour of housed dairy cows-a review. Dairy Science Abstracts 43: 57–63.Google Scholar
Castonguay, T. W., Kaiser, L. L. and Stern, J. S. 1986. Meal pattern analysis: artifacts, assumptions and implications. Brain Research Bulletin 17: 439–443.Google Scholar
Clifton, P. G. 2000. Meal patterning in rodents: meal size and the time between meals: effects of cage complexity and food costs. Physiology and Behavior 67: 339–346.Google Scholar
Collier, G., Johnson, D. F. and Mitchell, C. 1999. The relation between meal size and the time between meals: effects of cage complexity and food costs. Physiology and Behavior 67: 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkum, N. J., Bate, L. A., Tennessen, T. and Lirette, A. 1994. Consequences of reduction of number of food dispensers on feeding behaviour and stress level of feedlot steers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 27–35.Google Scholar
Dado, R. G. and Allen, M. S. 1994. Variation in and relationships among feeding, chewing, and drinking variables for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 132–144.Google Scholar
Dawson, L. E. R. and Mayne, C. S. 1998. The effect of silage fermentation characteristics on dry matter intake of steers. Animal Science 66: 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demaria-Pesce, V. H. and Nicolaides, S. 1998. Mathematical determination of feeding patterns and its consequence on correlational studies. Physiology and Behavior 65: 157–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dulphy, J. P. and Demarquilly, C. 1994. The regulation and prediction of feed intake in ruminants in relation to feed characteristics. Livestock Production Science 39: 1–12.Google Scholar
Dürst, B., Senn, M. and Langhans, W. 1993. Eating patterns of lactating dairy cows of 3 different breeds fed grass ad lib. Physiology and Behavior 54: 625–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elizalde, H. F. and Mayne, C. S. 1993. The effect of degree of competition per feed space on the dry matter intake and eating behaviour of dairy cows offered grass silage. Proceedings of the third research conference, British Grassland Society, Greenmount College, pp. 137–138.Google Scholar
Ellis, W. C., Poppi, D. P., Matis, J. H., Lippke, H., Hill, T. M. and Roquette, F. M. 1999. Dietary-digestive-metabolic interactions determining the nutritive potential of ruminant diets. In Nutritional ecology of herbivores (ed. Jung, H.-J. G. and Fahey, G. C.), pp. 423–481. American Society of Animal Science, Savoy, IL.Google Scholar
Emmans, G. C. and Kyriazakis, I. 2001. Consequences of genetic change in farm animals on food intake and feeding behaviour. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 60: 115–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, J. M. 1977. Interrelationships between physical and metabolic control of voluntary food intake in fattening, pregnant and lactating mature sheep: a model. Animal Production 24: 91–101.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1985. The importance of meals in the regulation of food intake. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 10: 14–24.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1993. Voluntary food intake. In Quantative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism (ed. Forbes, J. M. and France, J.), pp. 479–494. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1995. Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Jackson, D. A., Johnson, C. L., Stockhill, P. and Doyle, B. S. 1986. A method for monitoring of food intake and feeding behaviour of individual cattle kept in a group. Research and Development in Agriculture 3: 175–180.Google Scholar
Francke, H., Junge, W. and Kalm, E. 1990. [Roughage intake of dairy cows with special consideration of the behaviour. 1. Systematic effects on the roughage intake and the behaviour at the feeding rack.] Züchtungskunde 62: 333–348.Google Scholar
Friggens, N. C., Emmans, G. C., Kyriazakis, I., Oldham, J. D. and Lewis, M. 1998a. Feed intake relative to stage of lactation for dairy cows consuming total mixed diets with a high or low ratio of concentrate to forage. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2228–2239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friggens, N. C., Nielsen, B. L., Kyriazakis, I., Tolkamp, B. J. and Emmans, G. C. 1998b. Effects of feed composition and stage of lactation on the short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 3268–3277.Google Scholar
Gill, M. and Romney, D. 1994. The relationship between the control of meal size and the control of daily intake in ruminants. Livestock Production Science 39: 13–18.Google Scholar
Gonyou, H. W. and Stricklin, W. R. 1981. Eating behaviour of beef cattle groups fed from a single stall or trough. Applied Animal Ethology 7: 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harb, M. Y. and Campling, R. C. 1985. Variation among pregnant, non-lactating dairy cows in eating and ruminating behaviour, digestibility and voluntary intake of hay. Grass and Forage Science 40: 109–111.Google Scholar
Harb, M. Y., Reynolds, V. S. and Campling, R. C. 1985. Eating behaviour, social dominance and voluntary intake of silage in group-fed milking cattle. Grass and Forage Science 40: 113–118.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, A. J. and Conrad, H. R. 1987. Measuring feed-intake patterns and meal size of lactating dairy-cows. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 705–711.Google Scholar
Ingrand, S. 1999. [Batching management in beef cow herds. Effects of within-group heterogeneity of nutritional requirements on intake and feeding behaviour in Charolais cows.] Doctoral thesis, Institut National Agronomique, Paris-Grignon, France.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. A., Johnson, C. L. and Forbes, J. M. 1991. The effect of compound composition and silage characteristics on silage intake, feeding behaviour, production of milk and live-weight change in lactating dairy cows. Animal Production 52: 11–19.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N. 1994. Continuous univariate distributions, vol. 1, second edition. Wiley Interscience, London.Google Scholar
Ketelaars, J. J. M. H. and Tolkamp, B. J. 1992. Toward a new theory of feed intake regulation in ruminants. 1. Causes of differences in voluntary feed intake: critique of current views. Livestock Production Science 30: 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketelaars, J. J. M. H. and Tolkamp, B. J. 1996. Oxygen efficiency and the control of energy flow in animals and man. Journal of Animal Science 74: 3036–3051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L. and Muller, K. E. 1988. Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. PWS-KENT Publ. Co., Boston.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I., Tolkamp, B. J. and Hutchings, M. R. 1998. Towards a functional explanation for the occurrence of anorexia during parasitic infections. Animal Behaviour 56: 265–274.Google Scholar
Linnane, M. I., Brereton, A. J. and Giller, P. S. 2001. Seasonal changes in circadian grazing patterns of Kerry cows (Bos taurus) in semi-feral conditions in Kilarney Park, Co. Kerry, Ireland. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71: 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, D. R. 1987. Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of rumen function. Journal of Animal Science 64: 1548–1558.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. R. 1994. Regulation of forage intake. In Forage quality, evaluation and utilization (ed. Fahey, G. C.), pp. 450–493. American Society for Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Metz, H. 1974. Stochastic models for the temporal fine structure of behavioural processes. In Motivational control systems analysis (ed. McFarland, D. J.) pp. 5–86. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Metz, J. H. M. 1975. Time patterns of feeding and rumination in domestic cattle. Communications Agricultural University 75–12, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Minitab, . 1996. Minitab for Windows, release 11.1. Minitab, Inc., USA.Google Scholar
Morita, S., Devir, S., C. C., Ketelaars-de Lauwere, Smits, A. C., Hoogeveen, H. and Metz, J. H. M. 1996. Effects of concentrate intake on subsequent roughage intake and eating behavior of cows in an automatic milking system. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 1572–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Numerical Algorithms Group. 1993. Library manual mark 16. Numerical Algorithms Group, NAG Central Office, Oxford.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. C., Yan, T., Gordon, F. J. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1998. Effects of bacterial innoculation of unwilted and wilted grass silages. 2. Intake, performance and eating behaviour by dairy cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 131: 113–119.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D., Rook, A. J. and Orr, R. J. 1991. Patterns of ingestive behaviour of sheep continuously stocked on monocultures of ryegrass or white clover. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 237–250.Google Scholar
Poppi, D. P., Gill, M. and France, J. 1994. Integration of theories of intake regulation in growing ruminants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 167: 129–147.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J. and Huckle, C. A. 1997. Activity bout criteria for grazing cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54: 89–98.Google Scholar
Savory, C. J. 1999. Temporal control of feeding behaviour and its association with gastrointestinal function. Journal of Experimental Zoology 283: 339–347.Google Scholar
Sibly, R. M., Nott, H. M. R. and Fletcher, D. J. 1990. Splitting behaviour into bouts. Animal Behaviour 39: 63–69.Google Scholar
Slater, P. J. and Lester, N. P. 1982. Minimising errors in splitting behaviour into bouts. Behavior 79: 153–161.Google Scholar
Thiago, L. R. L., Gill, M. and Sissons, J. W. 1992. Studies of method of conserving grass herbage and frequency of feeding in cattle. 2. Eating behaviour, rumen motility and rumen fill. British Journal of Nutrition 67: 319–336.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, B. J. 1999. Limitations in the use of constraints for intake predictions. In Regulation of feed intake (ed. Heide, D. Van der et al. ), pp. 151–166. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, B. J., Allcroft, D. J., Austin, E. J., Nielsen, B. L. and Kyriazakis, I. 1998a. Satiety splits feeding behaviour into bouts. Journal of Theoretical Biology 194: 235–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolkamp, B. J. and Kyriazakis, I. 1997. Measuring diet selection in dairy cows: effect of training on choice of dietary protein level. Animal Science 64: 197–207.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, B. J. and Kyriazakis, I. 1999a. To split behaviour into bouts, log-transform the intervals. Animal Behaviour 54: 807–817.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, B. J. and Kyriazakis, I. 1999b. A comparison of five methods that estimate meal criteria in cattle. Animal Science 69: 501–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolkamp, B. J., Schweitzer, D. P. N. and Kyriazakis, I. 2000. The biologically relevant unit for the analysis of short-term feeding behaviour of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 2057–2068.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, second edition. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, J. W. 1999. Nutritional strategies for managing the heat stressed dairy cow.Journal of Animal Science 77: (suppl. 2) 21–35.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. 1996. Some aspects of constraints to forage consumption by ruminants. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47: 175–197.Google Scholar
Yeates, M. P., Tolkamp, B. J., Allcroft, D. J. and Kyriazakis, I. 2001. The use of mixed distribution models to determine bout criteria for analysis of animal behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 213: 413–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed