Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T01:39:42.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory evaluation of ensiled poultry litter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Hadjipanayiotou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access

Abstract

Poultry litter collected from a commercial broiler house, bedded with wood shavings, was used. The material was screened and ground before it was ensiled either alone or with other agricultural by-products, namely chopped barley straw, a mixture of weeds and grapefruit peels. The digestible organic matter in the dry matter value in vitro (0·39) for litter was comparable with that for straw and weeds. Of the total nitrogen (36·3 g/kg dry matter), 0·19 was ammonia-nitrogen and 0·77 protein-nitrogen. Digestible energy and crude fibre in the litter were 7·19 MJ and 334 g/kg dry matter, respectively. Addition of poultry litter at ensiling resulted in significant increases in nitrogen and ash content of the original mixtures. Inclusion of sodium hydroxide in fermented and non-fermented mixtures elevated digestible organic matter in the dry matter values in vitro by 0·19 and 0·13, respectively; the crude fibre concentration was lowered. All initial mixtures were free of lactic acid and were positive for the pathogen Proteus when tested. Unlike crude fibre, fatty acid and free ammonia, which were increased after fermentation, digestible organic matter in the dry matter and pH values were decreased. Ensiling killed the pathogen Proteus in the majority of the silages tested. The silages had a pleasant aroma and colour, and were consumed by Chios sheep.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Public Health Association. 1970. Diagnostic Procedures. 5th ed. (ed. Bodily, H. L.). American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. N. and Fontenot, J. P. 1966. Protein and energy value of peanut hull and wood shaving poultry litters. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 367371.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. N. and Taylor, J. C. 1975. Recycling animal waste as a feedstuff: a review. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 14381457.Google Scholar
Caswell, L. F., Fontenot, J. P. and Webb, K. E. Jr, 1975. Effect of processing method on pasturization and nitrogen components of broiler litter and on nitrogen utilization by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 750759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, L. F., Fontenot, J. P. and Webb, K. E. Jr, 1978. Fermentation and utilization of broiler litter ensiled at different moisture levels. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 547561.Google Scholar
Fontenot, J. P., Webb, K. E. Jr, Harmon, B. W., Tucker, R. E. and Moore, W. E. C. 1971. Studies of processing, nutritional value and palatability of broiler litter for ruminants. In Proc. Int. Symp. Livest. Wastes, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 301304. American Society of Agricultural Engineers.Google Scholar
Harmon, B. W., Fontenot, J. P. and Webb, K. E. Jr, 1975. Ensiled broiler litter and corn forage. I. Fermentation characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 144155.Google Scholar
Jhiuravliov, E. M. 1963. [Method for the determination of acids in silages.] In Roukavodstvo po Zooteknitceskomou Analyzou Kormov (ed. Literatura, Sel'kokhoziaistvennayia), pp. 154158. Moskova.Google Scholar
Lamm, W. D. J., Webb, K. E. Jr, and Fontenot, J. P. 1979. Ensiling characteristics, digestibility and feeding value of ensiled cattle waste and ground hay with and without sodium hydroxide. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 104110.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty‘s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
O'Shea, J. and Wilson, R. K. 1965. Relationship between in vitro and in vivo dry matter digestibility. Ir. J. agric. Res. 4: 235237.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tagari, H. 1977. The nutritive value of poultry by-products as ruminant feed, as affected by different disinfecting methods. Comprehensive Report. United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. GrassldSoc. 18: 104111.Google Scholar