Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:09:17.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth, carcass composition and serum hormone responses to photoperiod and ovariectomy in heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. A. Zinn ,
L. T. Chapin ,
W. J. Enright  and
H. A. Tucker
S. A. Zinn
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
L. T. Chapin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
W. J. Enright
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
H. A. Tucker
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Get access

Abstract

To determine effects of photoperiod and ovaries and their interactions on live-weight (LW) gain, carcass composition, growth hormone (GH), insulin (INS) and prolactin (PRL), crossbred beef heifers were utilized. Heifers (no. = 70) were blocked by LW and assigned to a pre-treatment slaughter group for estimation of initial carcass composition or to treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial experiment (no. = 14 per treatment). Main effects were: photoperiod (8 h light (L): 16 h dark (D) v. 16L: 8D) and ovaries (intact (INT) v. ovariectomized (OVX)). Heifers were given a maize-based mixed diet (115 g protein and 11·5 MJ metabolizable energy per kg dry matter) ad libitum once per day at 07.30 h. On days 64 and 138, blood samples were taken every 30 min for 10 h from five heifers in each treatment. On day 144 treated heifers were slaughtered. Relative to OVX heifers, INT heifers had greater (P < 0·01) average LW gain (1·03 v. 1·17 kg/day), carcass weight (252 v. 270 kg) and carcass protein accretion rates (68 v. 82 g/day) but carcass fat accretion was not affected (P < 0·l; 381 v. 399 g/day). Compared with 8L: 16D, exposure to 16L: 8D non-significantly increased LW gain more in OVX heifers (16 kg) than in INT heifers (3 kg). Photoperiod did not significantly influence weight or composition of the carcass. There was no significant interaction between photoperiod and ovaries on carcass composition. Across all heifers GH declined (P < 0·05) and INS and PRL increased (P < 0·05) from day 64 to 138. Compared with 8L: 16D, exposure to 16L: 8D increased PRL on day 64 (P < 0·05; 13·4 v. 28·5 u.g/1) and decreased INS averaged across days 64 and 138 (P = 0·l; 0·71 v. 0·55 u/l) but had no effect on GH. GH, INS and PRL did not differ between INT and OVX heifers. It is concluded that ovariectomy of heifers reduces LW gains, carcass weights and accretion of protein, and that exposure to 16L: 8D partially prevents the loss in LW gain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 365 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis. 10th ed. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Beck, T. W., Smith, V. G., Seguin, B. E. and Convey, E. M. 1976. Bovine serum LH, GH and prolactin following chronic implantation of ovarian steroids and subsequent ovariectomy. Journal of Animal Science 42: 461–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourne, R. A. and Tucker, H. A. 1975. Serum prolactin and LH responses to photoperiod in bull calves. Endocrinology 97: 473–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clegg, M. T. and Carroll, F. D. 1956. Further studies of the anabolic effect of stilbestrol in cattle as indicated by carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 15: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. L., Hossner, K. L. and Ohlson, D. L. 1984. Endocrine regulation of growth in ruminants. In Manipulation of Growth in Farm Animals (ed. Roche, J. F. and O'Callaghan, D.), pp. 151–178. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. L., Ohlson, D. L., Klindt, J. and Anfinson, M. S. 1977. Episodic growth hormone secretory patterns in sheep: relationship to gonadal steroid hormones. American Journal of Physiology 233: E519–E523.Google ScholarPubMed
Dinusson, W. E., Andrews, F. N. and Beeson, W. M. 1950. The effects of stilbestrol, testosterone, thyroid alteration and spaying on the growth and fattening of beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 9: 321–330.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Driver, P. M., Brown, W. B., Scanes, C. G. and Hart, I. C. 1979. The effect of daylength on the growth of lambs. 2. Blood concentrations of growth hormone, prolactin, insulin and thyroxine, and the effect of feeding. Animal Production 29: 43–51.Google Scholar
Gill, J. L. 1986. Repeated measurement: sensitive tests for experiments with few animals. Journal of Animal Science 63: 943–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, J. L. and Hafs, H. D. 1971. Analysis of repeated measurements of animals. Journal of Animal Science 33: 331–336.Google Scholar
Hamernik, D. L., Males, J. R., Gaskins, C. T. and Reeves, J. J. 1985. Feedlot performance of hysterectomized and ovariectomized heifers. Journal of Animal Science 60: 358–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hankins, O. G. and Howe, P. E. 1946. Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts. Technical Bulletin, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 926, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Horstman, L. A., Callahan, C. J., Morter, R. L. and Amstutz, H. E. 1982. Ovariectomy as a means of abortion and control of estrus in feedlot heifers. Theriogenology 17: 273–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ireland, J. J. and Roche, J. F. 1982. Development of antral follicles in cattle after prostaglandin-induced luteolysis: changes in serum hormones, steroids in follicular fluid, and gonadotropin receptors. Endocrinology 111: 2077–2086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johns, J. T., Gill, W., Absher, C. W., Aaron, D., Hodge, D. and Deaton, P. 1986. Effect of spaying, implanting and method of spaying on growth of yearling crossbred heifers. Journal of Animal Science 63: Suppl. 1, p. 210 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Klindt, J., Ohlson, D. L., Davis, S. L. and Schanbacher, B. D. 1985. Ontogeny of growth hormone, prolactin, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone secretory patterns in the ram. Biology of Reproduction 33: 436–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koprowski, J. A. and Tucker, H. A. 1971. Failure of oxytocin to initiate prolactin or luteinizing hormone release in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 54: 1675–1680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leining, K. B., Bourne, R. A. and Tucker, H. A. 1979. Prolactin response to duration and wavelength of light in prepubertal bulls. Endocrinology 104: 289–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leining, K. B., Tucker, H. A. and Kesner, J. S. 1980. Growth hormone, glucocorticoid and thyroxine response to duration, intensity and wavelength of light in prepubertal bulls. Journal of Animal Science 51: 932–942.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. S., Hafs, H. D. and Convey, E. M. 1979. Serum hormone patterns associated with growth and sexual development in bulls. Journal of Animal Science 49: 1012–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merriam, G. R. and Wachter, W. K. 1982. Algorithms for the study of episodic hormone secretion. American Journal of Physiology 243: E310–E318.Google Scholar
Muir, L. A., Wien, S., Duquette, P. F., Rickes, E. L. and Cordes, E. H. 1983. Effects of exogenous growth hormone and diethylstilbestrol on growth and carcass composition of growing lambs. Journal of Animal Science 56: 1315–1323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, R. R., Chapin, L. T., Emery, R. S. and Tucker, H. A. 1980. Growth and hormonal response of heifers to various photoperiods. Journal of Animal Science 51: 1148–1153.Google Scholar
Peters, R. R., Chapin, L. T., Leining, K. B. and Tucker, H. A. 1978. Supplemental lighting stimulates growth and lactation in cattle. Science, Washington 199: 911–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petitcierc, D., Chapin, L. T., Emery, R. S. and Tucker, H. A. 1983. Body growth, growth hormone, prolactin and puberty response to photoperiod and plane of nutrition in Holstein heifers. Journal of Animal Science 57: 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petitclerc, D., Chapin, L. T. and Tucker, H. A. 1984. Carcass composition and mammary development responses to photoperiod and plane of nutrition in Holstein heifers. Journal of Animal Science 58: 913–919.Google Scholar
Purchas, R. W., MacMillan, K. L. and Hafs, H. D. 1970. Pituitary and plasma growth hormone levels in bulls from birth to one year of age. Journal of Animal Science 31: 358–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ray, D. E., Hale, W. H. and Marchello, J. A. 1969. Influence of season, sex and hormonal growth stimulants on feedlot performance of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 29: 490–495.Google Scholar
Roche, J. F. and Boland, M. P. 1980. Effect of extended photoperiod in winter on growth rate of Friesian male cattle. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 85–90.Google Scholar
Schanbacher, B. D. 1984. Manipulation of endogenous and exogenous hormones for red meat production. Journal of Animal Science 59: 1621–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schanbacher, B. D. and Crouse, J. D. 1980. Growth and performance of growing-finishing lambs exposed to long or short photoperiods. Journal of Animal Science 51: 943–948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanisiewski, E. P., Chapin, L. T., Petitclerc, D. and Tucker, H. A. 1987. Effect of photoperiod and castration on prolactin, testosterone and luteinizing hormone concentrations in male calves. Journal of Animal Science 65: 1306–1311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, L. V., Kirton, K. T., Hackett, A. J. and Hafs, H. D. 1971. Pituitary and blood plasma levels of gonadotropin after ovariectomy of heifers. Journal of Animal Science 32: 678–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trenkle, A. 1970. Plasma levels of growth hormone, insulin, and plasma protein-bound iodine in finishing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 31: 389–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, H. A., Petitclerc, D. and Zinn, S. A. 1984. The influence of photoperiod on body weight gain, body composition, nutrient intake and hormone secretion. Journal of Animal Science 59: 1610–1620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villa-godoy, A., Hughes, T. L., Emery, R. S., Enright, W. J., Ealy, A. D., Zinn, S. A. and Fogwell, R. L. 1990. Energy balance and body condition influence luteal function in Holstein heifers. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. In press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wettemann, R. P. and Tucker, H. A. 1974. Relationship of ambient temperature to serum prolactin in heifers. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 146: 908–911.Google Scholar
Wise, T. and Ferrell, C. 1984. Effects of immunization of heifers against estradiol on growth, reproductive traits and carcass characteristics. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 176: 243–248.Google Scholar
Zinn, S. A., Chapin, L. T., Enright, W. J. and Tucker, H. A. 1989. Failure of photoperiod to alter body growth and carcass composition in beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 67: 1249–1257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinn, S. A., Chapin, L. T. and Tucker, H. A. 1986a. Response of body weight and clearance and secretion rates of growth hormone to photoperiod in Holstein heifers. Journal of Animal Science 62: 1273–1278.Google Scholar
Zinn, S. A., Chapin, L. T. and Tucker, H. A. 1988. A note on the effects of previous photoperiod exposure and gradual transitions of light intensity at dawn and dusk on growth on Holstein heifers. Animal Production 46: 300–303.Google Scholar
Zinn, S. A., Purchas, R. W., Chapin, L. T., Petitclerc, D., Merkel, R. A., Bergen, W. G. and Tucker, H. A. 1986b. Effects of photoperiod on growth, carcass composition, prolactin, growth hormone and cortisol in prepubertal and postpubertal Holstein heifers. Journal of Animal Science 63: 1804–1815.Google Scholar