Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:28:34.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of forage supplements on the ingestive behaviour and production of dairy cows grazing ryegrass only or mixed ryegrass and white clover pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

C.J.C. Phillips ,
N.L. James  and
H.M. Nyallu
C.J.C. Phillips
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW
N.L. James
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW
H.M. Nyallu
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW
Get access

Abstract

The effects on milk yield and feeding behaviour of offering ryegrass silage (r), ryegrass and white clover silage (c), or grass hay (h) supplements were examined for cows grazing a ryegrass pasture (R) or a ryegrass and white clover pasture (C). The chemical composition of the two silages was similar but the hay contained less crude protein. Cows grazing R pasture spent longer feeding on c than r silages, and those consuming the c silage spent less time grazing than those consuming r silage. The cows grazing the C pasture spent longer feeding on r than c silages, and those consuming the r silage spent less time grazing than those consuming c silage. The cows’ intake of hay dry matter (DM) was less than silage DM and it was taken into the mouth at a slower rate, masticated more ana swallowed less frequently than silage. Milk yield and composition were not affected by the type of supplementary forage or pasture type. Thus cows grazing pastures of the two sward types spent longer feeding on forages with dissimilar botanical composition if given the option. However, as this reduced the time that they spend grazing, there was no effect on milk production.

Keywords

behaviourdairy cowsgrazinghaymilk yieldsilage
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , June 2000 , pp. 555 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis, 14th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bell, F.R. and Kitchell, R.L. 1966. Taste reception in the goat, sheep and calf. Journal of Physiology 183: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broadbent, P.J., McIntosh, J.A.R. and Spence, A. 1970. The evaluation of a device for feeding group-housed animals individually. Animal Production 12: 245–252.Google Scholar
Butris, G.Y. and Phillips, C.J.C. 1987. The effect of herbage surface water and the provision of supplementary forage on the intake and feeding behaviour of cattle. Grass and Forage Science 42: 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, J. and Newbould, P. 1984. Herbage production from grass/white clover swards: a review. In Forage legumes (ed. Thompson, D.J.), pp. 15–35. British Grassland Society, Hurley.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, W.J. and Mitchell, P.J. 1987. The effect of height and frequency of mowing on the yield and composition of perennial ryegrass-white clover swards in the autumn to spring periods. Grass and Forage Science 42: 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C.W., Hoogendoorn, C.J., Ryan, M.P. and Chu, A.C.P. 1992. Some effects of herbage composition, as influenced by cows grazing on ryegrass/white clover pastures. 1. Milk production in early spring: effects of different regrowth intervals during the preceding winter period. Grass and Forage Science 47: 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1985. Genstat version 5. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1976. The grassmeter. Report of the Breeding and Production Organization 1975/6 no. 26. Milk Marketing Board, Thames Ditton.Google Scholar
Miller, W.J., Clifton, C.M., Miller, J.K. and Fowler, P.R. 1965. Effects of feeding unlike forages, singly and in combination, on voluntary dry matter consumption and performance of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 1046–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. The analysis of agricultural materials, third edition. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Moore, C.A., Kennedy, S.J. and Laidlaw, A.S. 1991. Guidelines for cattle grazing grass-white clover swards. In Grass on the move (ed. Hopkins, A.) British Grassland Society occasional symposium no. 26, pp. 179–182.Google Scholar
Phillips, C.J.C. 1988. The use of conserved forage as a supplement for grazing dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 43: 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C.J.C. 1998. The use of individual dairy cows as replicates in the statistical analysis of their behaviour at pasture (letter to the editor). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 60: 365–369.Google Scholar
Phillips, C.J.C. and James, N.L. 1998. The effects of including white clover in perennial ryegrass swards and the height of mixed swards on the milk production, sward selection and ingestive behaviour of dairy cows. Animal Science 67: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C.J.C., James, N. and Murray-Evans, J.P. 1996. Effect of forage supplements on the incidence of bloat in dairy cows grazing high clover pasture. Veterinary Record 139: 162–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C.J.C. and Leaver, J.D. 1985a. Offering supplementary forage to grazing dairy cows. 1. Offering hay to dairy cows at high and low stocking rates. Grass and Forage Science 40: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C.J.C. and Leaver, J.D. 1985b. Offering supplementary forage to grazing dairy cows. 2. Offering grass silage in early and late season. Grass and Forage Science 40: 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D.J., Frame, J. and Leaver, J.D. 1989. A comparison of a grass/white clover sward with a grass plus fertilizer nitrogen under a three-cut silage regime. Research and Development in Agriculture 6: 147–150.Google Scholar
Rogers, G.L. 1979. Wilted silage as a supplement for pasture fed cows in late lactation. Ellinbank Dairy Research Station annual report, 1979, pp. 57–58. Department of Agriculture, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Rogers, G.L., Robinson, I. and Porter, R.H.D. 1980. The utilization of perennial ryegrass and white clover by lactating dairy cows. Ellinbank Dairy Research Station annual report 1980, p. 59. Department of Agriculture, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Stewart, T.A. 1984. Utilising white clover in grass based animal production systems. In Forage legumes (ed. Thompson, D.J.) British Grassland Society occasional symposium no. 16, pp. 93–103.Google Scholar
t’Mannetje, L. and Haydock, K.P. 1963. The dry weight rank method of botanical analysis of pasture. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 268–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D.J. 1984. The nutritive value of white clover. In Forage legumes (ed. Thomson, D.J.) British Grassland Society occasional symposium no. 16, pp. 78–92.Google Scholar
Thomson, D.J., Beever, D.E., Austin, A.R., Siddons, R.C., Cammell, S.B., Haines, M.J., Evans, R.T. and Dhanoa, M.S. 1983. The nutrient supply to, and the milk yield and composition of, lactating cows grazing perennial ryegrass or white clover. Animal Production 36: 502 (abstr.).Google Scholar