Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T10:00:19.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of live weight and body composition of gilts at 24 weeks of age on subsequent reproductive efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. H. King
R. H. King
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Get access

Abstract

A total of 96 gilts were used in two experiments to determine the effect of live weight and body composition at about 170 days of age on age of attainment of puberty, ovulation rate and subsequent reproductive efficiency.

In the first experiment 48 crossbred (Large White ♂ × Landrace ♀) gilts were randomly allocated at 21 days of age to each of six treatment groups which gave six different intakes of a protein-adequate diet. The food intakes were designed to achieve six live weights ranging from 59·6 to 118·0 kg at boar introduction at 170 days of age. Age at puberty declined linearly from 202 to 173 days with increasing live weight at boar introduction (P < 0·01). Ovulation rate at puberty was also positively affected by live weight at 170 days (P < 0·05).

In the second experiment, four littermates from each of 12 litters were randomly allocated at 28 days of age to four treatment groups. The groups were offered diets of varying protein adequacy at different feeding levels up to boar introduction at 165 days of age. The treatment groups comprised a factorial design with the factors being live weight (light, L or heavy, H) and fat level (lean, 1 or fat, f relative fat content). At boar introduction, mean live weights were 70·6, 71·5, 101·3 and 100·0 kg, and mean backfat depths were 11·3, 20·9, 21·7 and 27·0 mm for the LI, Lf, HI and Hf groups, respectively. Heavier gilts at boar introduction were younger (183 v. 199 days, P < 0·01) at puberty. Ovulation rate at puberty was also greater (11·0 v. 9·5, P < 0·05) in the heavier gilts. Gilts which were leaner at boar introduction also tended to attain puberty earlier (186 v. 195 days, P < 0·10) than fatter gilts.

In both experiments neither the subsequent reproductive efficiency of gilts after parturition nor the performance of their piglets was significantly affected by body weight or body composition at boar introduction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , August 1989 , pp. 109 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Brendemuhl, J. H., Lewis, A. J. and Peo, E. R. 1987. Effect of protein and energy intake by primiparous sows during lactation on sow and litter performance and sow serum thyroxine and urea concentrations. Journal of Animal Science 64: 1060–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, P. E. 1982. Factors affecting the natural attainment of puberty in the gilt. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 117–138. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. H. and Dunkin, A. C. 1986a. The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 3. The response to graded increases in food intake during lactation. Animal Production 42: 119–125.Google Scholar
King, R. H. and Dunkin, A. C. 1986b. The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 4. The relative effects of energy and protein intakes during lactation on the performance of sows and their piglets. Animal Production 43: 319–325.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N. and Aherne, F. X. 1985. Energy intake, body composition and reproductive performance of the gilt. Journal of Animal Science 60: 1518–1529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkwood, R. N., Aherne, F. X. and Beltranena, E. 1986. The influence of plane of feeding on the onset of puberty and ovulation rates at first and second estrus in gilts. Feeders Day Report, 1986, University of Alberta, pp. 110–112.Google Scholar
Mabry, J. W., Weaver, W. M., Benyshek, L. L. and Marks, M. A. 1985. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for growth, puberty and composition traits in gilts. Growth 49: 282–289.Google ScholarPubMed
Mullan, B. P. 1987. The effect of body reserves on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Paterson, A. M. and Lindsay, D. R. 1980. Induction of puberty in gilts. 1. The effects of rearing conditions on reproductive performance and response to mature boars after early puberty. Animal Production 31: 291–297.Google Scholar
Price, M. A., Aherne, F. X., Elliot, J. I. and Lodge, G. A. 1981. The effect of age at puberty on growth and carcass quality at market weight in the gilt. Animal Production 33: 159–164.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Van lunen, T. A. and Aherne, F. X. 1987. Effect of long-term feed restriction on age at puberty of gilts. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67: 797–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, I. H., Close, W. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1985. Strategies for sow nutrition: predicting the response of pregnant animals to protein and energy intake. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1985 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. S. A.), pp. 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar