Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:48:57.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of diet and housing on the development of sole haemorrhages, white line haemorrhages and heel erosions in Holstein heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. T. Livesey ,
T. Harrington ,
A. M. Johnston ,
S. A. May  and
J. A. Metcalf
C. T. Livesey
Affiliation:
Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB
T. Harrington
Affiliation:
ADAS Bridgets, Martyr Worthy, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 1AP
A. M. Johnston
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA
S. A. May
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA
J. A. Metcalf
Affiliation:
ADAS Bridgets, Martyr Worthy, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 1AP
Get access

Abstract

Haemorrhagic lesions, heel erosions and changes in foot conformation have been associated with husbandry, underfoot conditions and nutrition of dairy cows.

These characteristics were monitored in 40 heifers in a 2 × 2 factorial design starting in the last trimester of pregnancy and continuing until 12 weeks post partum. Primary treatments were housing in straw yards or cubicles and secondary treatments were alternative complete diets given during lactation which differed in concentrate: forage ratio. A scoring system was developed for each of the foot lesions to allow statistical analysis of results. Locomotion scoring was carried out weekly.

White line haemorrhages, sole haemorrhages and heel erosions were all present before calving. White line haemorrhages were exacerbated by housing in cubicle yards and alleviated by housing in straw yards (P < 0·001) with an interaction between diet and housing around calving (P < 0·05). Sole haemorrhages were exacerbated both by housing in cubicle yards (P < 0·01) and the high concentrate diet (P < 0·01) with an interaction between diet and housing around calving (P < 0·05). Heel erosions were exacerbated (P < 0·05) by housing in straw yards but not affected by diet. Sole haemorrhage and heel erosion scores generally increased during early lactation (P < 0·001) independent of the treatments. There was evidence that these foot lesions were not caused by laminitis. There was a higher incidence of lameness for heifers given the high concentrate diet but no correlation between locomotion score and the type of lesion or lesion score.

Keywords

dairy cattlehousinglamenesslaminitisnutrition
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , August 1998 , pp. 9 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire.Google Scholar
Aikins, S. 1981. Lameness in dairy cows. Irish Veterinary Journal 35: 135–140.Google Scholar
Baggott, D. G. and Russell, A. M. 1981. Lameness in cattle. British Veterinary Journal 137: 113–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazeley, K. and Pinsent, P. J. N. 1984. Preliminary observations on a series of outbreaks of acute laminitis in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 115: 619–622.Google Scholar
Clancy, M. J. and Wilson, R. K. 1966. Development and application of a new chemical method for predicting the digestibility and intake of herbage samples. Proceedings of the 10th international grassland congress, pp. 445–453.Google Scholar
Colam-Ainsworth, P., Lunn, G. A., Thomas, R. C. and Eddy, R. G. 1989. Behaviour of cows in cubicles and its possible relationship with laminitis in replacement dairy heifers. Veterinary Record 125: 573–575.Google Scholar
Distl, O. 1996. Improvements in the health of cattle through the genetic selection of traits related to the feet and legs. Tierärztliche Umschau 51: 331–340.Google Scholar
Esslemont, R. J. and Peeler, E. J. 1993. The scope for raising margins in dairy herds by improving fertility and health. British Veterinary Journal 149: 537–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fussell, R. J. and McCalley, D. V. 1987. Determination of volatile fatty acids (C2-C5) and lactic acid silage by gas chromatography. Analyst 112: 1213–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenough, P. R. and Vermunt, J. J. 1994. In search of an epidemiologic approach to investigating bovine lameness problems. Eighth international symposium on disorders of the ruminant digit (ed. Greenough, P. R.), Banff, Canada, pp. 186–196.Google Scholar
Her Majesty's Stationery Office. 1982. The feeding stuffs regulations. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Leonard, F. C., O'Connell, J. and O'Farrell, K. 1994. Effect of different housing conditions on behaviour and foot lesions in Friesian heifers. Veterinary Record 134: 490–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manson, F. J. and Leaver, J. D. 1988. The influence of dietary protein intake and of hoof trimming on lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 47: 191–199.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1985. The analysis of agricultural materials. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, reference book no. 427, MAFF, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1993. Prediction of energy values of compound feeding stuffs for farm animals. MAFF, London.Google Scholar
Offer, J. E., Logue, D. N. and Roberts, D. J. 1997. The effect of protein source on lameness and solear lesion formation in dairy cattle. Animal Science 65: 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterse, D. J. 1979. Nutrition as a possible factor in the pathogenesis of ulcer of the sole in cattle. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 104: 966–970.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Hill, W. G., Stott, A. W., Brotherstone, S. and Simm, G. 1995. Selection for longevity and yield in dairy cows using transmitting abilities for type and yield. Animal Science 61: 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermunt, J. J. 1992. "Subclinical" laminitis in dairy cattle. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 40: 133–138.Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. J. and Greenough, P. R. 1994. Predisposing factors of laminitis in cattle. British Veterinary Journal 150: 151–164.Google Scholar