Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:59:56.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of suckling frequency in pigs from birth to weaning of their piglets: a sociobiological approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

B. Puppe  and
A. Tuchscherer
B. Puppe
Affiliation:
Forschungsbereich Physiologische Grundlagen der Tierhaltung
A. Tuchscherer
Affiliation:
Forschungsbereich Biometrie, Forschungsinstitut für die Biologie landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere, D-18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The suckling frequency in 34 first-lactation sows and their litters in conventional farrowing pens was observed during a 35-day lactation period from birth to weaning. In order to quantify the ontogenetic development of this behaviour a non-linear regression function was used as a model. The maximum (MAX) of the curve was determined at day 8×5 (31×4 sucklings per 24-h period) and was considered as the biological beginning of the weaning process. The occurrence of MAX was shifted towards an earlier time by about 6 days earlier from small (4 to 7 piglets per litter) to large litters (11 to 14 piglets per litter). However, no significant influence of the litter size on the development of the daily suckling frequency and the average individual piglet weight was found. Nevertheless, there was a tendency for an inverse relationship between the litter size and the piglet weight during lactation and, further, for an increased daily suckling frequency during early lactation and a lower frequency during late lactation in larger litters. As a compensation for the decreasing suckling frequency piglets markedly increased their creep food consumption in the last week of the suckling period (day 28 to 35). The results indicate that the suckling behaviour in domestic pigs reflects sow-piglet relationships which are consistent with a theoretically predicted model of weaning conflict. Hence, it is suggested that modelling the suckling behaviour using well defined and comparable measures may be a suitable approach for the evaluation of the weaning process both in terms of sociobiology (e.g. weaning conflict, parent-offspring conflict) and of farm animal science (e.g. performance, housing conditions).

Keywords

litter sizepigletssowssucklingweaning
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 273 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algers, B. 1993. Nursing in pigs: communicating needs and distributing resources. Journal of Animal Science 71: 2826–2831.Google Scholar
Auldist, D. E., Morrish, L., Eason, P. and King, R. H. 1998. The influence of litter size on milk production of sows. Animal Science 67: 333–337.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1965. Studies on milk production of Large White pigs. Journal of Agriculture Science, Cambridge 46: 97–118.Google Scholar
Bøe, K. 1991. The process of weaning in pigs: when the sow decides. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 47–59.Google Scholar
Bøe, K. 1993. Maternal behaviour of lactating sows in a loose-housing system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, E. Z. 1998. Is suckling behaviour a useful predictor of milk intake? A review. Animal Behaviour 56: 521–532.Google Scholar
Cameron, E. Z., Stafford, K. J., Linklater, W. L. and Veltman, C. J. 1999. Suckling behaviour does not measure milk intake in horses, Equus caballus. Animal Behaviour 57: 673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castrén, H., Algers, B. and Jensen, P. 1989. Occurrence of unsuccessful sucklings in newborn piglets in a semi-natural environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 61–73.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 1980. A review of the behavioural mechanism of milk ejection of the domestic pig. Applied Animal Ethology 6: 247–255.Google Scholar
Fraser, D., Kramer, D. L., Pajor, E. A. and Weary, D. M. 1995. Conflict and cooperation: sociobiological principles and the behaviour of pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, A., Diaz, J., Avila, M. and Cama, M. 1987. A note on the natural suckling frequency of piglets. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science 21: 291–294.Google Scholar
Herskin, M. S., Jensen, K. H. and Thodberg, K. 1999. Influence of environmental stimuli on nursing and suckling behaviour in domestic sows and piglets. Animal Science 68: 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illmann, G. and Madlafousek, J. 1995. Occurrence and characteristics of unsuccessful nursings in minipigs during the first week of life. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 9–18.Google Scholar
Illmann, G., S˘pinka, M. and Žtětková, Z. 1998. Influence of massage during simulated non-nutritive nursings on piglets’ milk intake and weight gain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P. 1988. Maternal behaviour and mother-young interactions during lactation in free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P. 1995. The weaning process of free-ranging domestic pigs: within- and between-litter variations. Ethology 100: 14–25.Google Scholar
Jensen, P. and Recén, B. 1989. When to wean — observations from free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 49–60.Google Scholar
König, B., Riester, J. and Markl, H. 1988. Maternal care in house mice (Mus musculus). II. The energy cost of lactation as a function of litter size. Journal of Zoology, London 216: 195–210.Google Scholar
Künkele, J. and Kenagy, G. J. 1997. Inefficiency of lactation in primiparous rats: the costs of first lactation. Physiological Zoology 70: 571–577.Google Scholar
Künkele, J. and Trillmich, F. 1997. Are precocial young cheaper? Lactation energetic in the guinea pig. Physiological Zoology 70: 589–596.Google Scholar
Martin, P. 1984. The meaning of weaning. Animal Behaviour 32: 1257–1258.Google Scholar
Mendl, M. and Paul, E. S. 1989. Observation of nursing and sucking behaviour as an indicator of milk transfer and parental investment. Animal Behaviour 37: 513–515.Google Scholar
Pajor, E. A., Fraser, D. and Kramer, D. L. 1991. Consumption of solid food by suckling piglets: individual variation and relation to weight gain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 139–155.Google Scholar
Pajor, E. A., Fraser, D. and Kramer, D. L. 1994. Parent-offspring conflict in pigs. Proceedings of the 28th international congress of the ISAE, National Institute of Animal Science, Foulum, Denmark, p. 83.Google Scholar
Pajor, E. A., Weary, D. M., Fraser, D. and Kramer, D. L. 1999. Alternative housing for sows and litters. 1. Effects of sow-controlled housing on reponses to weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 105–121.Google Scholar
Puppe, B. and Tuchscherer, A. 1999. Developmental and territorial aspects of suckling behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa f. domestica). Journal of Zoology, London 249: 307–313.Google Scholar
Schön, P. C., Puppe, B., Gromeyko, T. and Manteuffel, G. 1999. Common features and individual differences in nurse grunting of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa): a multi-parametric analysis. Behaviour 136: 49–66.Google Scholar
S˘pinka, M., Illmann, G., Algers, B. and Z˘te˘tková, Z. 1997. The role of nursing frequency in milk production in domestic pigs. Journal of Animal Science 75: 1223–1228.Google Scholar
S˘pinka, M., Illmann, G., Z˘te˘tková, Z., Krejc˘í,, P., Tománek, M., Sedlák, L. and Lidicky´, J. 1999. Prolactin and insulin levels in lactating sows in relation to nursing frequency. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 17: 53–64.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, fourth edition, vol. 2. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1974. Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist 14: 249–264.Google Scholar
Tuchscherer, M., Puppe, B. and Tuchscherer, A. 1994. Composition of sow milk during lactation and its influence on parameters of energy metabolism, immune status and body weight of piglets. Proceedings of the VIth international symposium on digestive physiology in pigs (ed. Souffrant, W. B. and Hagemeister, H.), pp. 216–219. FBN-Schriftenreihe 3 (EAAP-publication no. 80), Dummerstorf.Google Scholar
Wattanakul, W., Sinclair, A. G., Stewart, A. H., Edwards, S. A. and English, P. R. 1997. Performance and behaviour of lactating sows and piglets in crate and multisuckling systems: a study involving European White and Manor Meishan genotypes. Animal Science 64: 339–349.Google Scholar
Whatson, T. S. and Bertram, J. M. 1980. A comparison of incomplete nursing in the sow in two environments. Animal Production 30: 105–114.Google Scholar
Winfield, C. G., Hemsworth, P. H., Taverner, M. R. and Mullaney, P. D. 1974. Observations on the sucking behaviour of piglets in litters of varying size. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Science 10: 307–310.Google Scholar