Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:33:33.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the effects of cracked wheat and sodium hydroxide-treated wheat on food intake, milk production and rumen digestion in dairy cows given maize silage diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

R. H. Phipps ,
J. D. Sutton ,
D. J. Humphries  and
A. K. Jones
R. H. Phipps
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AT, UK
J. D. Sutton
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AT, UK
D. J. Humphries
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AT, UK
A. K. Jones
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AT, UK
Get access

Abstract

To examine the effects of manipulating the amount and ruminal degradability of starch on food intake, milk production and digestion in the rumen of lactating dairy cows, cracked wheat (CW) and sodium hydroxide-treated wheat (SW) were compared when offered with either immature (IM) or mature (MM) maize silage given in a 3: 1 dry matter (DM) ratio with grass silage. The total mixed ration (TMR) contained (kg/t DM basis) forage 600, wheat (CW or SW) 170, rapeseed meal 100, soya-bean meal 100, molasses/urea supplement 30 and minerals and vitamins were added at 20 kg/t diet DM. In experiments 1 and 2 respectively, 16 multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows and four similar cows with duodenal and ruminal cannulas were offered four diets (IMCW, IMSW, MMCW, MMSW) in 4 ✕ 4 Latin-square designs. In experiment 3, the in sacco degradability of CW and SW was measured in the rumen of three lactating fistulated cows. In experiment 1 total DM intake was 0·7 kg/day higher and milk yield was 0·5 kg/day higher with MM than IM silage but the increases were not significant and type of wheat had no effect. Milk fat content was reduced by MM silage (P < 0·05) but was unaffected by type of wheat. For milk protein content SW caused a non-significant increase with IM but a decrease (P < 0·05) with MM silage (interaction P < 0·05). There were no significant effects on yield of fat or protein. Neutral-detergent fibre digestibility in the rumen was unaffected by the treatments. Starch intake increased (P < 0·05) with MM silage when compared with IM silage and was accompanied by an increase (P < 0·01) in starch flow to the duodenum and in the amount (P < 0·001) digested in the rumen, although there was no significant change in rumen digestibility. Replacing CW with SW increased starch flow to the duodenum (P < 0·05) and reduced rumen digestibility (P < 0·05). Although the amount of total nitrogen (TN) digested in the rumen and rumen digestibility decreased (P < 0·01) with crop maturity, the flow of TN and non-ammonia nitrogen to the duodenum was unaffected. Total tract digestibility of DM was unaffected by treatments. Although the amount of starch digested in the total tract increased for MM compared with IM silage, reflecting the higher starch intake, total tract starch digestibility was unaffected by treatment and averaged 0·972. There were no main treatment effects on daily mean pH, concentration of ammonia or concentration or molar proportions of volatile fatty acids in the rumen. With SW, effective degradability (outflow rate of 0·08 per h) for both DM and starch was reduced when compared with CW. In conclusion the studies confirm that SW is more slowly fermented than CW and can increase the supply of starch to the duodenum. However the concept that increasing starch supply to the duodenum by a combination of MM silage and SW is likely to be beneficial to milk protein yield or concentration is not established under the present dietary regimen.

Keywords

dairy cowsmaize silagerumen digestionsodium hydroxide treatmentwheat
Type
Ruminant, nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , June 2001 , pp. 585 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdalla, A. L., Sutton, J. D., Phipps, R. H. and Humphries, D. J. 1999. Digestion in the rumen of lactating dairy cows given mixtures of urea-treated whole-crop wheat and grass silage. Animal Science 69: 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammell, S. B., Sutton, J. D., Beever, D. E., Humphries, D. J. and Phipps, R. H. 2000. The effect of crop maturity on the nutritional value of maize silage for lactating dairy cows. 1. Energy and nitrogen utilization. Animal Science 71: 381–390.Google Scholar
Deschard, G., Mason, V. C. and Tetlow, R. M. 1988. Treatment of whole-crop cereals with alkali. 4. Voluntary intake and growth in steers given wheat ensiled with sodium hydroxide, urea or ammonia. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19: 55–66.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. 1975. The use of markers to partition digestion within the digestive tract of ruminants. In Digestion and metabolism in the ruminant (ed. Mc, I. W.Donald and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 277–291. University of New England Publishing Unit, Armidale.Google Scholar
Knowlton, K. F., Glenn, B. P. and Erdman, R. A. 1998. Performance, ruminal fermentation, site of starch digestion in early lactation cows fed corn grain harvested and processed differently. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1972–1984.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, R. J., Blake, J. S. and Spechter, H. H. 1994. The effect of increasing starch intake and source in supplements fed three times a day to dairy cows on silage intake, milk yield and milk composition. Proceedings of the 44th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Edinburgh, p. 116.Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Doherty, J. G. 1996. The effect of fine grinding or sodium hydroxide treatment of wheat, offered as part of a concentrate supplement, on the performance of lactating dairy cows. Animal Science 63: 11–19.Google Scholar
Nocek, J. E. and Tamminga, S. 1991. Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3598–3629.Google Scholar
Nunan, T. 1997. The effect of stage of maturity on the ruminal degradation characteristics of maize silage. M.Sc. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
O’Mara, F. P., Murphy, J. J. and Rath, M. 1997. The effect of replacing dietary beet pulp with wheat treated with sodium hydroxide, ground wheat, or ground corn in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 530–540.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Sutton, J. D., Beever, D. E. and Jones, A. K. 2000. The effect of crop maturity on the nutritional value of maize silage for lactating dairy cows. 3. Forage intake and milk production. Animal Science 71: 401–409.Google Scholar
Porter, M. G., Patterson, D. C., Steen, R. W. J. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. Determination of dry matter and gross energy of grass silage. Proceedings of the seventh silage conference, The Queen’s University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. K., Sutton, J. D. and Beever, D. E. 1997. Effects of feeding starch to dairy cattle on nutrient availability and production. In Recent advances in animal nutrition-1997 (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C. and Wiseman, J.), pp. 105–134. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Abdalla, A. L., Phipps, R. H., Cammell, S. B. and Humphries, D. J. 1997. The effect of the replacement of grass silage by increasing proportions of urea-treated whole-crop wheat on food intake and apparent digestibility and milk production by dairy cows. Animal Science 65: 343–351.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Cammell, S. B., Beever, D. E., Humphries, D. J. and Phipps, R. H. 1998. Energy and nitrogen balance of lactating dairy cows given mixtures of urea-treated whole-crop wheat and grass silage. Animal Science 67: 203–212.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Cammell, S. B., Phipps, R. H., Beever, D. E. and Humphries, D. J. 2000. The effect of crop maturity on the nutritional value of maize silage for lactating dairy cows. 2. Ruminal and post-ruminal digestion. Animal Science 71: 391–400.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Phipps, R. H., Cammell, S. B. and Humphries, D. J. 2001. Attempts to improve the utilization of urea-treated whole-crop wheat by lactating dairy cows. Animal Science 73: In press.Google Scholar
Visser, H. de. 1993. Characterisation of carbohydrates in concentrates for dairy cows. In Recent advances in animal nutrition 1993 (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C. and Cole, D.J. A.), pp. 19–38. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, V. A., Glenn, B. P. and McLeod, K. R. 1997. Energy and nitrogen balance in lactating cows fed diets containing dry or high moisture corn in either rolled or ground form. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 2487–2496.Google Scholar