Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T22:44:49.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats 3. Muscle weight distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. L. Thonney ,
St C. S. Taylor ,
J. I. Murray  and
T. H. McClelland
M. L. Thonney
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research§, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
St C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research§, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
J. I. Murray
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research§, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
T. H. McClelland
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research§, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

Males and females from Soay, Welsh Mountain, Southdown, Finnish Landrace, Jacob, Wiltshire Horn and Oxford Down sheep breeds and a breed of feral goats were slaughtered when they reached 0·40, 0·52, 0·64 or 0·76 of the mean mature body weight of their breed and sex. Total weight of dissected muscle was close to 0·30 times fleece-free empty body weight, or 0·24 times live weight, for all breeds and stages of maturity. The growth of 12 individual muscles or muscle groups dissected from the commercially higher-valued joints of the carcass, was examined in relation to live weight and total muscle weight. Limb muscles matured early. All 12 muscles, when combined, also matured early so that the proportion of lean tissue from the higher-valued joints declined as live weight increased.

There were small but significant sex differences in the relative growth rate of some muscles. The abdominal muscles were early maturing for males and average for females. There were also sex differences in muscle weight distribution. The proportion of muscle in the hind limb of females was 1·055 times that in males, while the 12 muscles from higher-valued cuts constituted 0·403 of total carcass muscle for females and 0·389 for males, a proportional difference of 0·035.

Muscle weight distribution was unrelated to breed size with the possible exception of m. gastrocnemius which appeared to be relatively smaller in genetically larger breeds. After accounting for differences in mature weight, there remained small but significant breed deviations in muscle weight distribution. Southdowns had the most attractive distribution. Feral goats and Jacob sheep, although they had the highest proportion of total muscle, had a much less attractive distribution.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 277 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butler-Hogg, B. W. and Brown, A. J. 1986. Muscle weight distribution in lambs: a comparison of entire male and female. Animal Production 42: 343–348.Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. and Whelehan, O. P. 1984. Fat partioning and muscle distribution in Texel and Scottish Blackface rams. Proceedings of 35th Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Vol. 2, Paper S4.9.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966. A classification of bovine muscles based on their relative growth patterns. Research in Veterinary Science 7: 326–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Griffiths, D. A., Thompson, J. M., Zamora, J. and James, A. M. 1983a. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity in large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 1. Muscle, bone and fat. Animal Production 36: 29–37.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Reddacliff, K. J., Thompson, J. M., Zamora, J. and Williams, J. 1984a. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of Australian Dorset Horn rams and wethers. 2. Individual muscles and muscle groups. Animal Production 39: 259–267.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Zamora, J., James, A. M., Thompson, J. M. and Williams, J. 1983b. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity in large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 2. Individual muscles and muscle groups. Animal Production 36: 165–174.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Zamora, J., Thompson, J. M., Reddacliff, K. J. and Griffiths, D. A. 1984b. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of Australian Dorset Horn rams and wethers. 1. Carcass muscle, fat and bone and body organs. Animal Production 39: 251–258.Google Scholar
Crosion, D., Kempsthr, A. J., Guy, D. R. and Jones, D. W. 1987. Carcass composition of crossbred lambs by ten sire breeds compared at the same carcass subcutaneous fat proportion. Animal Production 44: 99–106.Google Scholar
Fourie, P. D., Kirton, A. H. and Jury, K. E. 1970. Growth and development of sheep. II. Effect of breed and sex on the growth and carcass composition of the Southdown and Romney and their cross. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 13: 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. S. 1932. Problems of Relative Growth. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Jury, K. E., Fourie, P. D. and Kirton, A. H. 1977. Growth and development of sheep. IV. Growth of the musculature. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 20: 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Crosion, D. and Jones, D. W. 1987. Tissue growth and development in crossbred lambs by ten sire breeds. Livestock Production Science In press.Google Scholar
Lohse, C. L. 1973. The influence of sex on muscle growth in Merino sheep. Growth 37: 177–187.Google ScholarPubMed
Lohse, C. L., Moss, F. P. and Butterfield, R. M. 1971. Growth patterns of muscles of Merino sheep from birth to 517 days. Animal Production 13: 117–126.Google Scholar
Russell, W. S. 1973. Compreg User's Guide. IU/RC Series Report No. 5. Program Library Unit, Edinburgh Regional Computing Centre.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1980. Genetic size-scaling rules in animal growth. Animal Production 30: 161–165.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S., Mason, M. A. and McClelland, T. H. 1980. Breed and sex differences in muscle distribution in equally mature sheep. Animal Production 30: 125–133.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Taylor, St C. S. and McClelland, T. H. 1987a. Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats. 1. Growth and food intake. Animal Production 45: 239–260.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Taylor, St C. S., Mukkay, J. I. and McClelland, T. H. 1987b. Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats. 2. Body components at slaughter. Animal Production 45: 261–276.Google Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. 1964. The carcase composition of sheep, cattle and pigs as functions of body weight. In Carcase Composition and Appraisal of Meal Animals (ed. Tribe, D E.), pp. 5.1–5.16, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne.Google Scholar