Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-ln9sz Total loading time: 0.267 Render date: 2021-09-23T12:55:40.494Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bull beef production from suckler herds of traditional breed type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. S. Robertson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
B. G. Lowman
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Advisory and Development Department, East of Scotland College of Agriculture, Edinburgh
Get access

Abstract

The feasibility of producing bull beef in suckler herds of traditional breed type was investigated in two parts. A controlled feeding experiment (Part 1) was carried out with weaned bull and steer calves slaughtered at 398, 432 and 466 kg live weight. Bulls and steers were compared on a standard level of feeding and in addition a group of bulls was given a ration providing a 20% higher daily intake of metabolizable energy. This latter group grew significantly faster than the control bulls and steers, and consumed similar total amounts of metabolizable energy when slaughtered at the same final weight. Carcasses from both groups of bulls were significantly leaner than those of steers. With regard to weight of lean produced per day of age the ranking was bulls on the high energy diet > other bulls > steers.

In Part 2 the performance and management demands from birth to slaughter of bulls and steers were compared in a number of spring and autumn-calving herds. Bulls gained live weight more rapidly than steers and although they were taken to heavier slaughter weights their carcasses were significantly leaner. Some readjustment of management practices, e.g. separation of male and female calves with their dams was required. No serious behavioural problems were encountered during the suckling or finishing stages.

A consumer acceptance trial showed that, in relation to steaks normally purchased, 61% of local consumers judged bull steaks as average or above in eating quality compared with 91% for steer steaks. It is concluded that although bull beef production is feasible a market outlet is an essential prerequisite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, P., Lesser, D., Robertson, I. S., Parry, D. A., Lowman, B. G. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1978. A consumer test of bull versus steer beef. J. Sci. FdAgric. 29: In press.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. and Butterfield, R. M. 1976. New Concepts of Cattle Growth, Chap. 5. Sydney Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brännäng, E. 1966. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XVIII. The effect of castration and age of castration on the growth rate, feed conversion and carcase traits of Swedish Red and White cattle. LantbrHogsk. Annh 32: 329415.Google Scholar
Clancy, H. J. and Wilson, R. K. 1966. Development and application of a new chemical method for predicting the digestibility and intake of herbage samples. Proc. 10th Int. Grassld Congr., Helsinki, pp. 445452.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. and Smith, R. J. 1972. Tissue separation—to assess beef and lamb variation. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series): 113122.Google Scholar
Joseph, R. L. and Connolly, J. 1974. Tenderness of bull and steer beef. Ir. J. agric. Res. 13: 307322.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish Fd, No. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Prescott, J. H. D. and Lamming, G. E. 1964. The effects of castration on meat production in cattle, sheep and pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63: 341357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, I. S., Ocariz, J. L. H., Wilson, J. C. and Paver, H. 1969. Gonadectomy in intensive beef production. In Meat Production from Entire Male Animals (ed. Rhodes, D. N.), pp. 7990. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Robertson, I. S., Paver, H. and Wilson, J. C. 1970. Effect of castration and dietary protein level on growth and carcass composition in beef cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74: 299310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, I. S., Wilson, J. C. and Morris, P. G. D. 1967. Growth in castrated cattle. Growth, carcase composition and sexual development in bulls, steers and cattle castrated by Baiburtcjan's method. Vet. Rec. 81: 88103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spedding, A. W. 1969. Some data on commercial bull beef production in the United Kingdom. In Meat Production from Entire Male Animals (ed. Rhodes, D. N.), pp. 9195. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Turton, J. D. 1969. The effect of castration on meat production from cattle, sheep and pigs. In Meat Production from Entire Male Animals (ed. Rhodes, D. N.), pp. 150. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Smith, J. S. and Mollison, G. S. 1977. Prediction of the energy requirements for growth in beef cattle. 3. Body weight and heat production in Hereford × British Friesian bulls and steers. Anim. Prod. 24: 237244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Bull beef production from suckler herds of traditional breed type
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Bull beef production from suckler herds of traditional breed type
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Bull beef production from suckler herds of traditional breed type
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *