Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T08:45:54.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do different habitat preference survey methods produce the same conservation recommendations for lesser kestrels?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2004

A. M. A. Franco
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK Present address: School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Fax: +44 (0) 113 343 2835; E-mail: a.m.a.franco@leeds.ac.uk
I. Catry
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal and Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
W. J. Sutherland
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
J. M. Palmeirim
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal and Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Get access

Abstract

The analysis of habitat selection underlies many conservation recommendations. Different researchers use different methods, therefore there is a need to examine whether the results are consistent. This study examined habitat selection by lesser kestrels, Falco naumanni, a globally threatened species, using two methods: visual sighting data from a 35-km transect and radio-telemetry of 33 birds. Habitat use and spatial ecology were studied across all of the breeding season in a pseudo-steppe area, where traditional agro-grazing systems are still present but some areas have been transformed into pine plantations. Telemetry data indicate that, in good quality habitat, lesser kestrels prefer to forage close to the colony. Furthermore, the home ranges obtained were smaller than those for lesser kestrels using intensively managed habitats or more forested areas. Habitat availability was determined within a 4-km radius of the colony and habitat preferences were determined using compositional analysis. Both methods were found to produce similar results, but telemetry provided a larger number of significant differences between habitats. Before the chicks hatched, lesser kestrels preferred grazed fallows, ploughed fields and cereal, while after hatching cereal stubble was the preferred habitat. In steppe habitats the protection of such foraging habitats within a 3-km radius from the colonies could be a very effective conservation measure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)