Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T21:29:43.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nature-Nurture Interaction in Different Types of School Environments A Longitudinal Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Siv Fischbein*
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Research, Stockholm Institute of Education, Sweden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A model of nature-nurture interaction in school situations emanating from a longitudinal Swedish twin project is presented. This model implies that interactional effects measured by MZ-DZ within-pair comparisons over time are related to the type of behavior studied, as well as teacher and pupil influences at different levels. In a more permissive and stimulating school situation, hereditary factors are hypothesized to be more influential (decisive for behavioral variation) than in a more restrictive and nonstimulating situation. A study of such interactional effects will require longitudinal measurements of pupil behavior as well as teacher and parental influences. To acquire a variation in permissiveness/restrictiveness and stimulation/nonstimulation at the societal level, comparisons are made between twins attending grade 4-6 in compulsory schools in Sweden and twins of the same age attending Israelian Kibbutz schools.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1987

References

REFERENCES

1.Arfwedson, G (1985): School Code and Teacher Work. Studies in Education and Psychology, No. 17. Malmo: Liber.Google Scholar
2.Fischbein, S (1979): Heredity-Environment Influences on Growth and Development During Adolescence. Lund: Liber.Google Scholar
3.Fischbein, S (1986): Person-Environment Interaction in Educational Settings. Report No. 1 from the Department of Educational Research at the Stockholm Institute of Education.Google Scholar
4.Ljung, B-O (1966): Intraklass-Korrelation (Intra-class correlation). Report No. 16 from the Department of Educational Research at the Stockholm Institute of Education.Google Scholar
5.Odin, B, Ahs, K (1985): Den Dolda Styrningen (The hidden restrictiveness). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
6.Postlethwaite, N (1967). School Organization and Student Achievement. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar