Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:01:27.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thick-Skinned Liberalism: Redefining Civility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Richard C. Sinopoli
Richard C. Sinopoli
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anorm of civility defines a standard of conduct that citizens can rightfully expect from strangers. What are appropriate norms of civility for citizens of liberal states? I argue that two approaches to civility are prominent in our political culture, one requiring “mere” tolerance, the other, that we affirm the worth of others' pursuits (and thereby the worth of those others). This split parallels a division in liberal theory between an interest-based account of liberalism (represented primarily by J. S. Mill) and a status-based account (represented principally by John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin), respectively. The exploration of this theoretical divide and how it relates to contending notions of civility helps to clarify disputes in the broader culture. I conclude that interest-based liberalism offers a more satisfactory approach to the issue at hand.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 612 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1980. Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Burr, Wesley R., and Christensen, Clark. 1992. “Undesirable Side Effects of Enhancing Self-Esteem.” Family Relations 41:460–64.Google Scholar
California Task Force To Promote Self-Esteem. 1990. Toward a State of Self-Esteem. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, John. 1983. Mill on Liberty: A Defence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Henry, William A. III. 1993. “The Politics of Separation.” Time (special issue, The New Face of America), Fall, 73ff.Google Scholar
Hentoff, Nat. 1994. “College Officials Lose Battle with First Amendment.” Liberal Opinion Week January 10, p. 6.Google Scholar
Hughes, Robert. 1993. Culture of Complaint: The Fraying of America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krauthammer, Charles. 1993. “Defining Deviancy Up.” Nee Republic, November 22, 20–25.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 1992. “Charting Liberal Virtues.” In Virtue: Nomos XXXIV, ed. Chapman, John W. and Galston, William A.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1972a. “On Liberty.” In his Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government, ed. Acton, H. B.. London: Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1972b. “Utilitarianism.” In his Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government, ed. Acton, H. B.. London: Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1993. “Defining Deviancy Down.” American Scholar 62:17–30.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Frederich. 1956. “The Genealogy of Morals.” In The Birth of Tragedy and the Genealogy of Morals, trans. Golffing, Francis. Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Orwin, Clifford. 1992. “Citizenship and Civility as Components of Liberal Democracy.” In Civility and Citizenship in Liberal Democratic Societies, ed. Banfield, Edward C.. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1982. “Social Unity and Primary Goods.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, ed. Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sinopoli, Richard C. 1993. “Liberalism and Contested Conceptions of the Good: The Limits of Neutrality.” Journal of Politics 55:644–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Andrew. 1993. “The Politics of Homosexuality.” New Republic, May 10, pp. 24ff.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1992. Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition.” Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar