Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:22:19.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Social Science Approach to Race, Redistricting, and Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

David Epstein  and
Sharyn O'Halloran
David Epstein
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Sharyn O'Halloran
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his critique of our earlier paper on majority-minority voting districts, David Lublin suggests that our conclusions with respect to the election of minorities to office are flawed, and that we incorrectly estimate optimal districting strategies for the substantive representation of minority interests in Congress. Subjecting these claims to direct empirical examination, we find that our previous results are unaltered by the inclusion of Latino voters in our estimates of equal opportunity, and that incumbency advantage cannot fully explain the recent victories of minority candidates in the South. Neither do the critiques of our results regarding substantive representation stand up to systematic analysis: Evidence at both the state level and over time confirm our conclusion that districts on the order of 45% black voting age population maximize the expected number of votes for minority-supported legislation.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 187 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alford, John, and Brady, David. 1989. “Partisan and Incumbent Advantage in U.S. House Elections, 1846–1986.” In Congress Reconsidered, 4th ed, ed. Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?” American Political Science Review 90(12): 794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. N.d.a. “The Impact of Majority-Minority Districts on Congressional Elections.” In Congressional Elections in the 1990's, ed. Brady, David, Cogan, John, and Ferejohn, John. Stanford: Hoover Institution. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. N.d.b. “Who Needs Ecological Regression? Measuring the Electoral and Policy Impact of Majority-Minority Voting Districts.” American Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1990. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34(11): 1142–64.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Handley, Lisa, and Niemi, Richard. 1992. Minority Representation and the Quest for Voting Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar