Political Disequilibrium and Scientific Inquiry: A Comment on William Riker's “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions”

Peter C. Ordeshook

doi:10.2307/1960639

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Riker, William H. 1980. A Reply to Ordeshook and Rae. American Political Science Review, Vol. 74, Issue. 2, p. 456.

Aranson, Peter H. and Ordeshook, Peter C. 1981. Regulation, redistribution, and public choice. Public Choice, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 69.

Koford, Kenneth 1982. Why so much stability? An optimistic view of the possibility of rational legislative decisionmaking. Public Choice, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 3.

Sened, Itai 1991. Contemporary Theory of Institutions in Perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 3, Issue. 4, p. 379.

Ordeshook, Peter C. 1992. Constitutional stability. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 137.

Vassilakis, Spyros 1992. Some economic applications of Scott domains. Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 24, Issue. 2-3, p. 173.

Ordeshook, Peter C. 1993. Some Rules of Constitutional Design. Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 198.

van Hees, Martin 1997. Explaining institutions: A defence of reductionism. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 51.

Artale, Angelo and Grüner, Hans Peter 2000. A Model of Stability and Persistence in a Democracy. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 20.

Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D. 2004. Lost in Translation: Social Choice Theory is Misapplied Against Legislative Intent. SSRN Electronic Journal,

McDonald, Michael D. Mendes, Silvia M. and Kim, Myunghee 2007. Cross-temporal and cross-national comparisons of party left-right positions. Electoral Studies, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 62.

Grüner, Hans Peter 2009. Inequality and Political Consensus. Theory and Decision, Vol. 67, Issue. 3, p. 239.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko and Lehtinen, Aki 2010. Economics Imperialism and Solution Concepts in Political Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 40, Issue. 3, p. 347.

Vallbé, Joan-Josep 2015. Frameworks for Modeling Cognition and Decisions in Institutional Environments. Vol. 21, Issue. , p. 13.

Cardona, Daniel and Ponsatí, Clara 2015. Representing a democratic constituency in negotiations: delegation versus ratification. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 399.

Werner, R. A. 2021. Banks and Economic Growth: A Basic Disequilibrium Model with Five Rationing Regimes. Review of Business and Economics Studies, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 9.

Damiani, Gianluca 2022. Looking for a ’Genuine Science of Politics’. William H. Riker and the Game Theoretical turn in Political Science. SSRN Electronic Journal ,

Article contents

Political Disequilibrium and Scientific Inquiry: A Comment on William Riker's “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions”

Abstract

Access options

References

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

Political Disequilibrium and Scientific Inquiry: A Comment on William Riker's “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions”

Abstract

Access options

References

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests