¹ Theodore L. Becker, “A Survey Study of Hawaiian Judges: The Effect on Decisions of Judicial Role Variations,” this Review, 60 (Sept. 1966), 677–680.

² Ibid., p. 677.

³ March, James G., “Sociological Jurisprudence Revisited, A Review (More or Less) of Max Gluckman,” Stanford Law Review, 8 (1956), p. 505CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁴ Op. cit., p. 679.

⁵ Since objective decision is defined as a decision consistent with the requirement of precedent but contrary to the judge's own “enlightened” view, it is necessary to know whether all judges perceive the requirement of precedent in a given hypothetical case in similar terms. Although the author does not go into this question, consensual cognition must be assumed in his model. Such an assumption may be questioned.

⁶ See: Guilford, J. P., Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (New York: 1956), p. 237Google Scholar.

⁷ A more detailed explanation of this “theory” and the data breakdown used are available on request.